WO1986000533A1

WO1986000533A1 - Bone implant

Info

Publication number: WO1986000533A1
Application number: PCT/NL1985/000027
Authority: WO
Inventors: Jan Willem Leenslag; Albert Johan Pennings; René Pieter Hendrick VETH; Henricus Wilhelm Bernhard Jansen
Original assignee: Rijksuniversiteit Te Groningen
Priority date: 1984-07-10
Filing date: 1985-07-10
Publication date: 1986-01-30
Also published as: AU4607885A; NL8402178A; EP0195012A1; JPS62500981A

Abstract

An implant article for treatment in reconstructive surgery of damage caused to bony material, said article comprising a composite of fibre material which may or may not be bio-degradable and is incorporated in a porous matrix of a bio-degradable organic polymer material.

Description

Title:

Bone implant.

The present invention relates to an implant article for treatment in reconstructive surgery of damage caused to bony material. At present it is being recognised that the meniscus is an important component of the knee-joint in case of injuries the repair or preservation of the undamaged part of which is preferred over the surgical removal of the meniscus . In this connection experience has shown that a damaged, e.g. torn, meniscus can only be healed if vascularisation of the injury is possible. It has further been established with animals by way of experiment that by reconstructive surgery of wedge-shaped and longitudinal injuries of the meniscus healing is effected by means of a synovial flap and after implantation of an implant article consisting of carbon fibres (Clin. Orthop. 181 (1983) 250-254). Although implantation of carbon fibres has proved to be a promising method of treating damaged menisci, technical deficiencies have become apparent, in most cases relating to a tendency to dislocation of the bundle of carbon fibres.

It is an object of the present invention to provide an implant article giving a solution for the above-mentioned drawback and permitting a more rapid ingrowth of tissue and vessels.

According to the present invention there is provided for this purpose an implant article of the above-mentioned type which is characterised by a composite of fibre material which may or may not be bio-degradable and is incorporated in a porous matrix of a biodegradable organic polymer material. The bio-degradable organic polymer material used for the matrix may be a polyurethane material, e.g., a polyether urethane, a polyester urethane and a polyether urea urethane; a polylacti.de material, e.g., a poly(L-lactide), a poly(D-lactide) and a poly (D,L-lactide); a polyglycolide material, e.g., a polyglycolic acid and copolymers composed of the different lactide materials, glycol materials and other hydroxycarboxylic acids, as well as homopolymers and copolymers of amino acids. The individual polymer materials of mixtures thereof may be used, if required, with other bio-degradable polymer materials, e.g., with a porous polyamide material.

The fibre material for reinforcing the composite according to the invention may be incorporated in the matrix as loose fibres, however, also as a woven fabric, a knitted fabric or another coherent combination of fibres. The fibres to be used according to the invention may or may not be bio-degradable and comprise, e.g., carbon fibres; sufficiently strong polyethylene fibres; poly (L-lactide fibres), if required, with additives, e.g., low-molecular additives or bio-degradeble homopolymers and/or copolymers; polyglycolide fibres; polyaramide fibres, e.g., poly(p-aminobenzoic acid) fibres; polyamide fibres, e.g., nylon fibres, or fibres of glycolide lactide copolymers.

The composite according to the invention may also include, e.g., materials capable of accelerating the bio-degradability of the matrix and the bio-degradability of the fibres, promoting ingrowth of tissue, having antibacterial activity and/or analgetic activity. Examples of such materials are citric acid, sodium citrate, salicylic acid, aspirin, tartaric acid, magnesium chloride and calcium phosphate. It has turned out that the composite according to the invention is a product which, in addition to bio-degradable and bio-compatible properties, is also microporous and is therefore eminently suitable for effecting vascularisation or ingrowth of tissue, without which properties the repair of torn bone material, such as cartilage material of the meniscus, must be ruled out. By embedding the reinforcing fibre material according to the invention in a matrix of a bio-degradable organic polymer material, no shift of the fibres appears to occur during the healing process. Although the properties of the composite according to the invention have been elucidated above, especially by means of the reconstructive-surgical treatment of meniscus injuries, the use of the composite is not restricted thereto.

A composite according to the invention useful in practice for the repair of large wedge-shaped tears of the meniscus in dogs has appeared to be an implant article made of a polyurethane-poly(L-lactide) organic polymer material as the matrix, in combination with carbon fibres. The composite formed therefrom was bio-degradable and bio-compatible and further microporous. The invention is illustrated by the following example.

Example

A. The materials used in this example for the preparation of the composite.

There was used a segmented poly (ether urethane) commercially available under the trade name Estane 5714F1 (Goodrich, Co., Breckville, Ohio, U.S.A.). The polylactide used was poly (L-lactide) (M_v - 3.5 x 10⁵), synthesised according to a process disclosed in the literature (Polymer 23 (1982) 1587).

To reinforcing material used was commercially available carbon fibres (Grafil EAS) (Courtaulds, Ltd., Coventry, England).

Sodium citrate (Merck) was further added to the subsequently prepared polymer solutions, in a low concentration. B. The preparation of the polymer solutions and the carbon fibres.

The polyurethane was reprecipitated 5 times (3 times from N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) , then 1 time from tetrahydrofuran (THF) and finally, 1 more time from DMF) . The.precipitant used was demineralised water. Reprecipitation was carried out at room temperature. The precipitated polyurethane was washed with ethanol (96%) , and air dried for 1 night, then dried in a vacuum stove for 1 more hour at T = 50°C.

Separate poly (L-lactide) - and polyurethane solutions were prepared which were added to each other just before each use. The solvent used for both polymers was a mixture of DMF and THF (DMF:THF = 75:25% ^v/v) . The poly (L-lactide) solution was saturated with sodium citrate.

The total polymer concentration of the final solution was 4% ^w/v; both polymers were mixed in a ratio of polyurethane :poly(L- lactide)=80:20% ^W/w.

The composite involved in the in vivo examination was prepared from a 4% ^w/vsolution. (For uses requiring larger pores this could be achieved by further diluting the polymer solutions.

A dilution of, e.g., 4% ^v/v, for instance, gave an average pore size of ± 100 /um, and a dilution of 3%^w/v gave an average pore size of ± 250 /um).

The carbon fibres were extracted with an acetone-THF mixture (acetone :THF = 50:50% ^v/v) for 24 hours at room temperature and then air dried. Subsequently, the fibres were cut to the desired length. C. Preparation of the porous polymer sheets.

1. Without carbon fibres.

(a) A tube provided with a Teflon layer was kept in the final polymer solution for 4 seconds (T = 20 °C) , (b) Then the tube was air dried for 15-20 seconds, with a rotary movement being performed.

(c) Subsequently the tube was immersed in a non-solvent (water, T = 45°C); residence time 2-3 minutes.

(d) Then the tube was placed in cold water (T = 10 °C, residenc time 2 minutes) and subsequently in ethanol (96%) , (residence time:

2 minutes); finally, the tube was immersed in water (T = 20°C, residence time: 3 minutes).

(e) After that the outermost polymer layer was carefully dried with blotting-paper. Thus one porous polymer layer was obtained. This operation was repeated until a porous polymer sheet was obtained having the desired thickness and without carbon fibres.

2. With carbon fibres.

(a) For a method of preparing a porous polymer sheet with carbon fibres 10 layers of the polymer were applied to the tube in the manner as described above.

(b) Then the carbon fibres (2 layers, crosswise arranged over each other) were affixed to the tube and the immersing/coating process was continued with another 10 polymer layers. According to another method carbon fibres were disposed in a layer of polymer solution (2 layers, crosswise arranged over each other), after which the non-solvent (water, T = 45°C) was added with an atomizer. After the above-described treatment the whole was repeated for 4 more times. Then the carbon fibres were sufficiently fastened in the polymer matrix to continue the immersing/coating process with this fabric (see C. (a) -(e)), with the composition being effected on both sides.

The final composite was built up of layers of the porous sheets as obtained under C., the polymer sheets with and without carbon fibres being alternately processed in the final composite. The different layers were bonded together with a 1% ^w/v polymer solution, using the process mentioned under C. Thus the composite was brought to the required dimensions from which the final meniscus prosthesis could be cut to size.

It is noted that, in addition to the above-mentioned mixture DMF/THF 75:25% ^v/v, e.g., also DMF/1.4-dioxane mixtures (75-25% ^V/v) (or other ratios) may be used. The resulting materials thereby obtain a somewhat different porous structure which may be very suited for orthopedic uses. Suitable solvents are further dimethylacetamide and dimethylsulfoxide.

In the above-indicated manner and with the indicated starting materials a composite was prepared on the basis of a mixture composed of 95 wt.% polyurethane and 5 wt.% poly (L-lactide), using the process described under C.2. (a). The resulting composite was microporous with a pore size of 35-50 /um. With the composite a research into the chances of a torn meniscus to be healed was conducted with a group of 12 dogs. Of each of the dogs a meniscus was surgically provided with a large wedge-shaped incision extending over approximately 30% of the meniscus. For the repair of the menisci the composite was folded double and sewed together, then adapted to the actual size of the damaged meniscus to be treated, placed in the incision and sewed together therein with 3-0 Dexon sewing-thread. The wound was closed and the dogs were given an opportunity to get on their legs again as soon as possible. Four weeks after the operation the progress of the healing process was evaluated arthroscopically, morphologically and histologically in the manner appropriate therefor from a medical point of view. It turned out that all the implant elements except one had remained in position, and that ingrowth of fibrous fibro-cartilaginous material had taken place over a substantial distance from the place where the implant element is in contact with the surrounding meniscus. In two cases the meniscus proved to have healed already completely. After a period of 14-19 weeks the implant element proved to have been completely absorbed in the meniscus. In a combination of a wedge-shaped and a longitudinal tear in the meniscus of rabbits, application of the implant element to these injuries of the meniscus proved to induce nearly complete healing.

Summarizing, the composite according to the invention proves to be easy in handling owing to applying the organic polymer matrix and conducive to ingrowth of tissue and vessels because of the micro porous condition thereof. These last-mentioned properties are necessary for enabling a damaged meniscus to heal, as appears from

S.S. Arnockzy et al., "The microvasculature of the meniscus and its response to surgery", Am.J. Sports med. 11 (1983) 131;

R.P.H. Veth et al., Clin. Orthop. 175 (1983) 259 and Clin.Orthop. 181

(1983) 212.

Claims

1. An implant article for treatment in reconstructive surgery of damage caused to bony material, characterised by a composite of fibre material which may or may not be bio-degradable and is incorporate in a porous matrix of a bio-degradable organic polymer material.

2. An implant article according to claim 1, characterised in that the bio-degradable organic polymer material is a polyurethane, a polylactide, a polyglycolide, a polyamide, a polyester and/or a copoly (α-amino acid) material.

3. An implant article according to claim 2, characterised in that the polyurethane material is a polyether urethane, a polyester urethane and/or a polyether urea urethane.

4. An implant article according to claim 2, characterised in that the polylactide material is a poly (L-lactide), a poly(D-lactide) and/or a poly(D,L-lactide).

5. An implant article according to claim 2, characterised in that the polyglycolide material is polyglycolic acid.

6. An implant article according to claim 2, characterised in that the polyamide material is a porous polyamide.

7. An implant article according to claim 1, characterised in that it contains the fibre material as loose fibres and/or as a coherent combination of fibres and that the employable fibre material is carbon fibres, polyethylene fibres, poly(L-lactide) fibres, polyglycolide fibre polyaramide fibres, polyamide fibres and/or fibres of glycolide-lactide copolymers, as well as fibres of other poly ( α-hydroxycarboxylic acids), a poly (β-methylpropiolactone), poly(dioxanone), polyglycine and other poly (α-amino acids), polypropylene and polyesters.

8. An implant article according to claim 7, characterised in that the poly(L-lactide) fibres contain low-molecular additives and/or bio-degradable homopolymers and/or copolymers.

9. An implant article according to claim 1, characterised in that the organic material is prepared from a mixture of a polyurethane, a poly (L-lactide) and a polyamide in different ratios.

10. An implant article according to claim 9, characterised in that the organic material is prepared from approximately 80-95% polyurethane and 20-5% poly(L-lactide).