US20110082947A1 - Connection rate limiting - Google Patents
Connection rate limiting Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20110082947A1 US20110082947A1 US12/723,615 US72361510A US2011082947A1 US 20110082947 A1 US20110082947 A1 US 20110082947A1 US 72361510 A US72361510 A US 72361510A US 2011082947 A1 US2011082947 A1 US 2011082947A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- load balancing
- balancing service
- firewall load
- counter
- firewall
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/1001—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
- H04L67/1036—Load balancing of requests to servers for services different from user content provisioning, e.g. load balancing across domain name servers
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
- H04L63/02—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for separating internal from external traffic, e.g. firewalls
- H04L63/0209—Architectural arrangements, e.g. perimeter networks or demilitarized zones
- H04L63/0218—Distributed architectures, e.g. distributed firewalls
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/1001—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/50—Network services
- H04L67/60—Scheduling or organising the servicing of application requests, e.g. requests for application data transmissions using the analysis and optimisation of the required network resources
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the field of web switches. More particularly, the present invention relates to connection rate limiting to ensure proper functioning of components on a web switch.
- Web switches provide traffic management to computer networks.
- the traffic management extends to packets received both from an outside network, such as the Internet, and from an internal network.
- a web switch may provide a series of software components to better handle the traffic. These components may include server load balancing (SLB), transparent cache switching (TCS), and firewall load balancing (FWLB).
- SLB server load balancing
- TCS transparent cache switching
- FWLB firewall load balancing
- Server load balancing allows IP-based services to be transparently balanced across multiple servers. This distributed design prevents servers from getting overloaded.
- Transparent cache switching allows for distributed cache servers, and likewise prevents the cache servers from getting overloaded.
- Firewall load balancing increases the network's overall firewall performance by distributing the Internet traffic load across multiple firewalls.
- Each service in a computer network may have a connection rate limit.
- the number of new connections per time period may be limited by using a series of rules.
- a counter is increased each time a server is selected to handle a connection request. For each service, connections coming in are tracked. Therefore, the source of connection-request packets need not be examined. Only the destination service is important. This saves significant time in the examination of the incoming requests.
- Each service may have its own set of rules to best handle the new traffic for its particular situation.
- FIG. 1 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a traffic management service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a traffic management service distributed over multiple servers in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a firewall load balancing service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a firewall load balancing service distributed over multiple firewalls in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a server load balancing service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a server load balancing service distributed over multiple servers in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a transparent cache switching service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 8 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a transparent cache switching service distributed over multiple caches in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 9 is a block diagram illustrating an apparatus for managing a traffic management service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 10 is a block diagram illustrating an apparatus for managing a firewall load balancing service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 11 is a block diagram illustrating an apparatus for managing a firewall load balancing service distributed over multiple firewalls in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 12 is a block diagram illustrating an apparatus for managing a server load balancing service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- the components, process steps, and/or data structures may be implemented using various types of operating systems, computing platforms, computer programs, and/or general purpose machines.
- devices of a less general purpose nature such as hardwired devices, field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), or the like, may also be used without departing from the scope and spirit of the inventive concepts disclosed herein.
- a traffic management component may be distributed over many different servers. Therefore, for purposes of this application a specific component type (such as TCS) may be referred to as a service.
- each service has a connection rate limit. The number of new connections per time period may be limited by using a series of rules.
- a counter is increased each time a server is selected to handle a connection request. For each service, connections coming in are tracked. Therefore, the source of connection-request packets need not be examined. Only the destination service is important. This saves significant time in the examination of the incoming requests.
- Each service may have its own set of rules to best handle the new traffic for its particular situation.
- a new transmission control protocol (TCP) connection request may be detected by looking at the SYN bit of the incoming packet. If it is set to on, then the packet is a new connection request.
- a new user datagram protocol (UDP) connection request may be detected by looking for any packet that doesn't have a session.
- connection rate limiting is applied to a server load balancing service.
- a reset is sent to the client (requesting party).
- connection rate limiting is applied to transparent cache switching.
- the request Upon receipt of a connection request that would exceed the maximum number of permitted connections per second, the request is sent to the Internet.
- the user instead of not getting the service at all, the user still has a strong chance of getting the request served. This process is transparent to the user.
- connection rate limiting is applied to firewall load balancing.
- the request Upon receipt of a connection request that would exceed the maximum number of permitted connections per second, the request is hashed to send it to a specific firewall.
- a hashing scheme may be applied to determine to which firewall to send the connection request. Different criteria may be applied in the hash table. For example, the hash table may be defined to direct the request to the firewall with the least connections. Alternatively, a round robin approach may be applied. In another embodiment, a weighted approach may be applied.
- the “scheme” may alternatively be a lack of a scheme, i.e., packets are simply dropped if the number of permitted connections per second is exceeded.
- connection rate limiting may be applied on a per server basis in addition to or instead of a per service basis.
- the number of connections sent to a particular firewall may be limited, but other firewalls in the system may have no limiting or a different limiting scheme applied.
- FIG. 1 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a traffic management service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- a new connection request for the service is detected by looking at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet.
- TCP transmission control protocol
- UDP user datagram protocol
- a counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval.
- a counter is incremented each time a new connection request is received for the service.
- new connection requests received for the service are denied if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined connection rate limit for the service.
- This denial may comprise sending a reset to a source address contained in a new connection request.
- it may comprise forwarding the new connection request to the Internet. It may also forward the new connection request in accordance with criteria in a hash table.
- the connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval.
- FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a traffic management service distributed over multiple servers in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- a new connection request for the service is detected by looking at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet.
- TCP transmission control protocol
- UDP user datagram protocol
- a counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval.
- a counter is incremented each time a new connection request is received for the service on one of the servers.
- new connection requests received for the service on the one server are denied if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined connection rate limit for the service on that server.
- This denying may comprise sending a reset to a source address contained in a new connection request.
- it may comprise forwarding the new connection request to the Internet. It may also forward the new connection request in accordance with criteria in a hash table.
- the connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval.
- FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a firewall load balancing service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- a new firewall load balancing service connection request is detected by looking at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet.
- TCP transmission control protocol
- UDP user datagram protocol
- a counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval.
- a counter is incremented each time a new firewall load balancing service connection request is received.
- new firewall load balancing service connection requests are dropped if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined firewall load balancing service connection rate limit.
- the connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval.
- FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a firewall load balancing service distributed over multiple firewalls in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- a new firewall load balancing service connection request for the service is detected by looking at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet.
- TCP transmission control protocol
- UDP user datagram protocol
- a counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval.
- a counter is incremented each time a new firewall load balancing service connection request is received.
- a hashing scheme is applied to determine to which firewall to forward a new firewall load balancing service connection request if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined firewall load balancing service connection rate limit.
- the hashing scheme may be one of several different possibilities. It may comprise directing a new firewall load balancing service connection request to the firewall with the least connections. It may comprise directing a new firewall load balancing service connection request to a firewall according to a round robin approach. It may comprise directing a new firewall load balancing service connection request to a firewall according to a weighted approach.
- the connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval.
- FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a server load balancing service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- a new server load balancing service connection request is detected by looking at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet.
- TCP transmission control protocol
- UDP user datagram protocol
- a counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval.
- a counter is incremented each time a new server load balancing service connection request is received.
- a reset is sent to a source address contained in the new server load balancing service connection request if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined server load balancing service connection rate limit.
- the connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval.
- FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a server load balancing service distributed over multiple servers in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- a new server load balancing service connection request for the server is detected by looking at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet.
- TCP transmission control protocol
- UDP user datagram protocol
- a counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval.
- a counter is incremented each time a new server load balancing service connection request for the server is received.
- a reset is sent to a source address contained in the new server load balancing service connection request if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined server load balancing service connection rate limit for the server.
- the connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval.
- FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a transparent cache switching service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- a new transparent cache switching service connection request is detected by looking at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet.
- TCP transmission control protocol
- UDP user datagram protocol
- a counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval.
- a counter is incremented each time a new transparent cache switching service connection request is received.
- the new transparent cache switching service connection request is sent to the Internet if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined transparent cache switching service connection rate limit.
- the connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval.
- FIG. 8 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a transparent cache switching service distributed over multiple caches in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- a new transparent cache switching service connection request for one of the caches is detected by looking at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet.
- TCP transmission control protocol
- UDP user datagram protocol
- a counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval.
- a counter is incremented each time a new transparent cache switching service connection request for the cache is received.
- the new transparent cache switching service connection request is sent to the Internet if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined transparent cache switching service connection rate limit for the cache.
- the connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval.
- FIG. 9 is a block diagram illustrating an apparatus for managing a traffic management service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- a memory 900 may be used to store a counter.
- a new connection request detector 902 may detect a new connection request for the service.
- a SYN bit examiner 904 may be used for this purpose to look at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet.
- TCP transmission control protocol
- a user datagram protocol packet session examiner 906 may detect a new connection request for the service by looking for any user datagram protocol (UDP) packets without a session.
- a counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval.
- a new connection request counter incrementer 908 coupled to the memory 900 and to the new connection request detector 902 increments the counter each time a new connection request is received for the service. If the service is distributed over multiple servers and the request is for one of the servers, the new connection request counter incrementer 908 may increment a counter each time a new connection request is received for the service on the one server.
- a new connection request denier 910 coupled to the new connection request counter incrementer 908 and to the memory 900 denies new connection requests received for the service if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined connection rate limit for the service.
- the new connection request denier 910 may deny new connection requests received for the service on the server if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined connection rate limit for the service on the server. This denying may comprise sending a reset to a source address contained in a new connection request using a source address reset sender 912 . Alternatively, it may comprise forwarding the new connection request to the Internet using a new connection request Internet forwarder 914 . It may also forward the new connection request as per a hash table using a new connection request hash table forwarder 916 .
- the connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval.
- FIG. 10 is a block diagram illustrating an apparatus for managing a firewall load balancing service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- a memory 1000 may be used to store a counter.
- a new firewall load balancing service connection request detector 1002 may detect a new firewall load balancing service connection request.
- a SYN bit examiner 1004 may be used for this purpose to look at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet.
- TCP transmission control protocol
- a user datagram protocol packet session examiner 1006 may detect a new firewall load balancing connection request by looking for any user datagram protocol (UDP) packets without a session.
- a counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval.
- a new firewall load balancing service connection request counter incrementer 1008 coupled to the memory 1000 and to the new firewall load balancing service connection request detector 1002 increments the counter each time a new firewall load balancing service connection request is received.
- a new firewall load balancing service connection request dropper 1010 coupled to the new firewall load balancing service connection request counter incrementer 1008 and to the memory 1000 drops new firewall load balancing service connection requests if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined firewall load balancing service connection rate limit.
- the connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval.
- FIG. 11 is a block diagram illustrating an apparatus for managing a firewall load balancing service distributed over multiple firewalls in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- a memory 1100 may be used to store a counter.
- a new firewall load balancing service connection request detector 1102 may detect a new firewall load balancing service connection request.
- a SYN bit examiner 1104 may be used for this purpose to look at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet.
- TCP transmission control protocol
- a user datagram protocol packet session examiner 1106 may detect a new firewall load balancing service connection request by looking for any user datagram protocol (UDP) packets without a session.
- UDP user datagram protocol
- a counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval.
- a new firewall load balancing service connection request counter incrementer 1108 coupled to the memory 1100 and to the new firewall load balancing service connection request detector 1102 increments the counter each time a new firewall load balancing service connection request is received.
- a new firewall load balancing service connection request hashing scheme applier 1110 coupled to the new firewall load balancing service connection request counter incrementer 1108 and to the memory 1100 applies a hashing scheme to determine to which firewall to forward a new firewall load balancing service connection request if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined firewall load balancing service connection rate limit.
- the hashing scheme may be one of several different possibilities.
- It may comprise directing a new firewall load balancing service connection request to the firewall with the least connections. It may comprise directing a new firewall load balancing service connection request to a firewall according to a round robin approach. It may comprise directing a new firewall load balancing service connection request to a firewall according to a weighted approach.
- the connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval.
- FIG. 12 is a block diagram illustrating an apparatus for managing a server load balancing service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- a memory 1200 may be used to store a counter.
- a new server load balancing service connection request detector 1202 may detect a new server load balancing service connection request.
- a SYN bit examiner 1204 may be used for this purpose to look at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet.
- TCP transmission control protocol
- a user datagram protocol packet session examiner 1206 may detect a new server load balancing service connection request for the service by looking for any user datagram protocol (UDP) packets without a session.
- UDP user datagram protocol
- a counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval.
- a new server load balancing service connection request counter incrementer 1208 coupled to the memory 1200 and to the new server load balancing service connection request detector 1202 increments a counter each time a new server load balancing connection request is received. If the service is distributed over multiple servers and the request is for one of the servers, the new server load balancing service connection request counter incrementer 1208 may increment the counter each time a new server load balancing service connection request is received for the server.
- the new server load balancing service connection request source address reset sender 1210 may send a reset to the source address of the new server load balancing service connection request if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined connection rate limit for the service on the server.
- the connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval.
- FIG. 13 is a block diagram illustrating an apparatus for managing a transparent cache switching service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
- a memory 1300 may be used to store a counter.
- a new transparent cache switching service connection request detector 1302 may detect a new transparent cache switching service connection request.
- a SYN bit examiner 1304 may be used for this purpose to look at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet.
- TCP transmission control protocol
- a user datagram protocol packet session examiner 1306 may detect a new transparent cache switching service connection request for the service by looking for any user datagram protocol (UDP) packets without a session.
- a counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval.
- a new transparent cache switching service connection request counter incrementer 1308 coupled to the memory 1300 and to the new transparent cache switching service connection request detector 1302 increments the counter each time a new transparent cache switching connection request is received. If the service is distributed over multiple caches and the request is for one of the caches, the new transparent cache switching service connection request counter incrementer 1308 may increment a counter each time a new transparent cache switching service connection request is received for the cache.
- a new transparent cache switching service connection request Internet sender 1310 coupled to the new transparent cache switching service connection request counter incrementer 1308 and to the memory 1300 sends the new transparent cache switching service connection request to the Internet if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined transparent cache switching service connection rate limit.
- the new transparent cache switching service connection request Internet sender 1310 may send the new transparent cache switching service connection request to the Internet if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined transparent cache switching service connection rate limit for the cache.
- the connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval.
Abstract
Each service in a computer network may have a connection rate limit. The number of new connections per time period may be limited by using a series of rules. In a specific embodiment of the present invention, a counter is increased each time a server is selected to handle a connection request. For each service, connections coming in are tracked. Therefore, the source of connection-request packets need not be examined. Only the destination service is important. This saves significant time in the examination of the incoming requests. Each service may have its own set of rules to best handle the new traffic for its particular situation.
Description
- The present application is a continuation of Ser. No. 10/139,073, filed May 3, 2002, by Ronald W. Szeto, David Chun Ying Cheung, and Rajkumar Jalan, entitled “CONNECTION RATE LIMITING” and is related to co-pending application Ser. No. 10/139,076, filed May 3, 2002, by Ronald W. Szeto, David Chun Ying Cheung, and Rajkumar Jalan, entitled “CONNECTION RATE LIMITING FOR SERVER LOAD BALANCING AND TRANSPARENT CACHE SWITCHING”.
- A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
- The present invention relates to the field of web switches. More particularly, the present invention relates to connection rate limiting to ensure proper functioning of components on a web switch.
- Web switches provide traffic management to computer networks. The traffic management extends to packets received both from an outside network, such as the Internet, and from an internal network. A web switch may provide a series of software components to better handle the traffic. These components may include server load balancing (SLB), transparent cache switching (TCS), and firewall load balancing (FWLB). Server load balancing allows IP-based services to be transparently balanced across multiple servers. This distributed design prevents servers from getting overloaded. Transparent cache switching allows for distributed cache servers, and likewise prevents the cache servers from getting overloaded. Firewall load balancing increases the network's overall firewall performance by distributing the Internet traffic load across multiple firewalls.
- Even though these software components are designed to manage traffic, the components themselves may become overwhelmed when traffic is heavy. For example, a server running TCS may become so overloaded with connections that it fails to properly handle packets sent through the connections. Traditional techniques for handling such a situation involve limiting the packet rate. This involves monitoring the number of packets received in short intervals, and dropping or redirecting packets if the number exceeds a threshold value. Unfortunately, for traffic management components, the number of packets received is not a direct predictor of when the components will become overloaded. These traffic management components are more likely to become overloaded when new connections are being established too quickly, as opposed to when new packets are coming in over those connections.
- What is needed is a solution to better handle increased traffic to traffic management components.
- Each service in a computer network may have a connection rate limit. The number of new connections per time period may be limited by using a series of rules. In a specific embodiment of the present invention, a counter is increased each time a server is selected to handle a connection request. For each service, connections coming in are tracked. Therefore, the source of connection-request packets need not be examined. Only the destination service is important. This saves significant time in the examination of the incoming requests. Each service may have its own set of rules to best handle the new traffic for its particular situation.
- The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated into and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate one or more embodiments of the present invention and, together with the detailed description, serve to explain the principles and implementations of the invention.
- In the drawings:
-
FIG. 1 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a traffic management service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a traffic management service distributed over multiple servers in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a firewall load balancing service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a firewall load balancing service distributed over multiple firewalls in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a server load balancing service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a server load balancing service distributed over multiple servers in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a transparent cache switching service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 8 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a transparent cache switching service distributed over multiple caches in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 9 is a block diagram illustrating an apparatus for managing a traffic management service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 10 is a block diagram illustrating an apparatus for managing a firewall load balancing service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 11 is a block diagram illustrating an apparatus for managing a firewall load balancing service distributed over multiple firewalls in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 12 is a block diagram illustrating an apparatus for managing a server load balancing service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. - Embodiments of the present invention are described herein in the context of a system of computers, servers, and software. Those of ordinary skill in the art will realize that the following detailed description of the present invention is illustrative only and is not intended to be in any way limiting. Other embodiments of the present invention will readily suggest themselves to such skilled persons having the benefit of this disclosure. Reference will now be made in detail to implementations of the present invention as illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The same reference indicators will be used throughout the drawings and the following detailed description to refer to the same or like parts.
- In the interest of clarity, not all of the routine features of the implementations described herein are shown and described. It will, of course, be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made in order to achieve the developer's specific goals, such as compliance with application- and business-related constraints, and that these specific goals will vary from one implementation to another and from one developer to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of engineering for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
- In accordance with the present invention, the components, process steps, and/or data structures may be implemented using various types of operating systems, computing platforms, computer programs, and/or general purpose machines. In addition, those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that devices of a less general purpose nature, such as hardwired devices, field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), or the like, may also be used without departing from the scope and spirit of the inventive concepts disclosed herein.
- A traffic management component may be distributed over many different servers. Therefore, for purposes of this application a specific component type (such as TCS) may be referred to as a service. In accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention, each service has a connection rate limit. The number of new connections per time period may be limited by using a series of rules. In a specific embodiment of the present invention, a counter is increased each time a server is selected to handle a connection request. For each service, connections coming in are tracked. Therefore, the source of connection-request packets need not be examined. Only the destination service is important. This saves significant time in the examination of the incoming requests. Each service may have its own set of rules to best handle the new traffic for its particular situation.
- In accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention, a new transmission control protocol (TCP) connection request may be detected by looking at the SYN bit of the incoming packet. If it is set to on, then the packet is a new connection request. In accordance with another specific embodiment of the present invention, a new user datagram protocol (UDP) connection request may be detected by looking for any packet that doesn't have a session.
- In accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention, connection rate limiting is applied to a server load balancing service. Upon receipt of a connection request that would exceed the maximum number of permitted connections per second, a reset is sent to the client (requesting party). Thus, instead of a user's request simply appearing to “hang” indefinitely, feedback is provided to the user to try again.
- In accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention, connection rate limiting is applied to transparent cache switching. Upon receipt of a connection request that would exceed the maximum number of permitted connections per second, the request is sent to the Internet. Thus, instead of not getting the service at all, the user still has a strong chance of getting the request served. This process is transparent to the user.
- In accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention, connection rate limiting is applied to firewall load balancing. Upon receipt of a connection request that would exceed the maximum number of permitted connections per second, the request is hashed to send it to a specific firewall. A hashing scheme may be applied to determine to which firewall to send the connection request. Different criteria may be applied in the hash table. For example, the hash table may be defined to direct the request to the firewall with the least connections. Alternatively, a round robin approach may be applied. In another embodiment, a weighted approach may be applied. The “scheme” may alternatively be a lack of a scheme, i.e., packets are simply dropped if the number of permitted connections per second is exceeded.
- In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, the connection rate limiting may be applied on a per server basis in addition to or instead of a per service basis. For example, the number of connections sent to a particular firewall may be limited, but other firewalls in the system may have no limiting or a different limiting scheme applied.
-
FIG. 1 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a traffic management service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. At 100, a new connection request for the service is detected by looking at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet. Alternatively, a new connection request for the service may be detected by looking for any user datagram protocol (UDP) packets without a session. At 102, a counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval. At 104, a counter is incremented each time a new connection request is received for the service. At 106, new connection requests received for the service are denied if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined connection rate limit for the service. This denial may comprise sending a reset to a source address contained in a new connection request. Alternatively, it may comprise forwarding the new connection request to the Internet. It may also forward the new connection request in accordance with criteria in a hash table. The connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval. -
FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a traffic management service distributed over multiple servers in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. At 200, a new connection request for the service is detected by looking at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet. Alternatively, a new connection request for the service may be detected by looking for any user datagram protocol (UDP) packets without a session. At 202, a counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval. At 204, a counter is incremented each time a new connection request is received for the service on one of the servers. At 206, new connection requests received for the service on the one server are denied if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined connection rate limit for the service on that server. This denying may comprise sending a reset to a source address contained in a new connection request. Alternatively, it may comprise forwarding the new connection request to the Internet. It may also forward the new connection request in accordance with criteria in a hash table. The connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval. -
FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a firewall load balancing service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. At 300, a new firewall load balancing service connection request is detected by looking at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet. Alternatively, a new firewall load balancing service connection request may be detected by looking for any user datagram protocol (UDP) packets without a session. At 302, a counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval. At 304, a counter is incremented each time a new firewall load balancing service connection request is received. At 306, new firewall load balancing service connection requests are dropped if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined firewall load balancing service connection rate limit. The connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval. -
FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a firewall load balancing service distributed over multiple firewalls in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. At 400, a new firewall load balancing service connection request for the service is detected by looking at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet. Alternatively, a new firewall load balancing service connection request for the service may be detected by looking for any user datagram protocol (UDP) packets without a session. At 402, a counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval. At 404, a counter is incremented each time a new firewall load balancing service connection request is received. At 406, a hashing scheme is applied to determine to which firewall to forward a new firewall load balancing service connection request if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined firewall load balancing service connection rate limit. The hashing scheme may be one of several different possibilities. It may comprise directing a new firewall load balancing service connection request to the firewall with the least connections. It may comprise directing a new firewall load balancing service connection request to a firewall according to a round robin approach. It may comprise directing a new firewall load balancing service connection request to a firewall according to a weighted approach. The connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval. -
FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a server load balancing service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. At 500, a new server load balancing service connection request is detected by looking at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet. Alternatively, a new server load balancing connection request may be detected by looking for any user datagram protocol (UDP) packets without a session. At 502, a counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval. At 504, a counter is incremented each time a new server load balancing service connection request is received. At 506, a reset is sent to a source address contained in the new server load balancing service connection request if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined server load balancing service connection rate limit. The connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval. -
FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a server load balancing service distributed over multiple servers in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. At 600, a new server load balancing service connection request for the server is detected by looking at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet. Alternatively, a new server load balancing connection request for the server may be detected by looking for any user datagram protocol (UDP) packets without a session. At 602, a counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval. At 604, a counter is incremented each time a new server load balancing service connection request for the server is received. At 606, a reset is sent to a source address contained in the new server load balancing service connection request if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined server load balancing service connection rate limit for the server. The connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval. -
FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a transparent cache switching service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. At 700, a new transparent cache switching service connection request is detected by looking at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet. Alternatively, a new transparent cache switching service connection request may be detected by looking for any user datagram protocol (UDP) packets without a session. At 702, a counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval. At 704, a counter is incremented each time a new transparent cache switching service connection request is received. At 706, the new transparent cache switching service connection request is sent to the Internet if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined transparent cache switching service connection rate limit. The connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval. -
FIG. 8 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing a transparent cache switching service distributed over multiple caches in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. At 800, a new transparent cache switching service connection request for one of the caches is detected by looking at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet. Alternatively, a new transparent cache switching service connection request for one of the caches may be detected by looking for any user datagram protocol (UDP) packets without a session. At 802, a counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval. At 804, a counter is incremented each time a new transparent cache switching service connection request for the cache is received. At 806, the new transparent cache switching service connection request is sent to the Internet if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined transparent cache switching service connection rate limit for the cache. The connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval. -
FIG. 9 is a block diagram illustrating an apparatus for managing a traffic management service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. Amemory 900 may be used to store a counter. A newconnection request detector 902 may detect a new connection request for the service. ASYN bit examiner 904 may be used for this purpose to look at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet. Alternatively, a user datagram protocolpacket session examiner 906 may detect a new connection request for the service by looking for any user datagram protocol (UDP) packets without a session. A counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval. A new connectionrequest counter incrementer 908 coupled to thememory 900 and to the newconnection request detector 902 increments the counter each time a new connection request is received for the service. If the service is distributed over multiple servers and the request is for one of the servers, the new connectionrequest counter incrementer 908 may increment a counter each time a new connection request is received for the service on the one server. A newconnection request denier 910 coupled to the new connectionrequest counter incrementer 908 and to thememory 900 denies new connection requests received for the service if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined connection rate limit for the service. If the service is distributed over multiple servers and the request is for one of the servers, the newconnection request denier 910 may deny new connection requests received for the service on the server if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined connection rate limit for the service on the server. This denying may comprise sending a reset to a source address contained in a new connection request using a source address resetsender 912. Alternatively, it may comprise forwarding the new connection request to the Internet using a new connectionrequest Internet forwarder 914. It may also forward the new connection request as per a hash table using a new connection request hash table forwarder 916. The connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval. -
FIG. 10 is a block diagram illustrating an apparatus for managing a firewall load balancing service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. Amemory 1000 may be used to store a counter. A new firewall load balancing serviceconnection request detector 1002 may detect a new firewall load balancing service connection request. ASYN bit examiner 1004 may be used for this purpose to look at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet. Alternatively, a user datagram protocolpacket session examiner 1006 may detect a new firewall load balancing connection request by looking for any user datagram protocol (UDP) packets without a session. A counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval. A new firewall load balancing service connectionrequest counter incrementer 1008 coupled to thememory 1000 and to the new firewall load balancing serviceconnection request detector 1002 increments the counter each time a new firewall load balancing service connection request is received. A new firewall load balancing serviceconnection request dropper 1010 coupled to the new firewall load balancing service connectionrequest counter incrementer 1008 and to thememory 1000 drops new firewall load balancing service connection requests if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined firewall load balancing service connection rate limit. The connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval. -
FIG. 11 is a block diagram illustrating an apparatus for managing a firewall load balancing service distributed over multiple firewalls in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. Amemory 1100 may be used to store a counter. A new firewall load balancing serviceconnection request detector 1102 may detect a new firewall load balancing service connection request. ASYN bit examiner 1104 may be used for this purpose to look at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet. Alternatively, a user datagram protocolpacket session examiner 1106 may detect a new firewall load balancing service connection request by looking for any user datagram protocol (UDP) packets without a session. A counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval. A new firewall load balancing service connectionrequest counter incrementer 1108 coupled to thememory 1100 and to the new firewall load balancing serviceconnection request detector 1102 increments the counter each time a new firewall load balancing service connection request is received. A new firewall load balancing service connection request hashingscheme applier 1110 coupled to the new firewall load balancing service connectionrequest counter incrementer 1108 and to thememory 1100 applies a hashing scheme to determine to which firewall to forward a new firewall load balancing service connection request if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined firewall load balancing service connection rate limit. The hashing scheme may be one of several different possibilities. It may comprise directing a new firewall load balancing service connection request to the firewall with the least connections. It may comprise directing a new firewall load balancing service connection request to a firewall according to a round robin approach. It may comprise directing a new firewall load balancing service connection request to a firewall according to a weighted approach. The connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval. -
FIG. 12 is a block diagram illustrating an apparatus for managing a server load balancing service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. Amemory 1200 may be used to store a counter. A new server load balancing serviceconnection request detector 1202 may detect a new server load balancing service connection request. ASYN bit examiner 1204 may be used for this purpose to look at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet. Alternatively, a user datagram protocolpacket session examiner 1206 may detect a new server load balancing service connection request for the service by looking for any user datagram protocol (UDP) packets without a session. A counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval. A new server load balancing service connectionrequest counter incrementer 1208 coupled to thememory 1200 and to the new server load balancing serviceconnection request detector 1202 increments a counter each time a new server load balancing connection request is received. If the service is distributed over multiple servers and the request is for one of the servers, the new server load balancing service connectionrequest counter incrementer 1208 may increment the counter each time a new server load balancing service connection request is received for the server. A new server load balancing service connection request source address resetsender 1210 coupled to the new server load balancing service connectionrequest counter incrementer 1208 and to thememory 1200 sends a reset to the source address of the new server load balancing service connection request if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined server load balancing service connection rate limit. If the service is distributed over multiple servers and the request is for one of the servers, the new server load balancing service connection request source address resetsender 1210 may send a reset to the source address of the new server load balancing service connection request if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined connection rate limit for the service on the server. The connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval. -
FIG. 13 is a block diagram illustrating an apparatus for managing a transparent cache switching service in a computer network in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. Amemory 1300 may be used to store a counter. A new transparent cache switching serviceconnection request detector 1302 may detect a new transparent cache switching service connection request. ASYN bit examiner 1304 may be used for this purpose to look at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet. Alternatively, a user datagram protocolpacket session examiner 1306 may detect a new transparent cache switching service connection request for the service by looking for any user datagram protocol (UDP) packets without a session. A counter is reset to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval. A new transparent cache switching service connectionrequest counter incrementer 1308 coupled to thememory 1300 and to the new transparent cache switching serviceconnection request detector 1302 increments the counter each time a new transparent cache switching connection request is received. If the service is distributed over multiple caches and the request is for one of the caches, the new transparent cache switching service connectionrequest counter incrementer 1308 may increment a counter each time a new transparent cache switching service connection request is received for the cache. A new transparent cache switching service connectionrequest Internet sender 1310 coupled to the new transparent cache switching service connectionrequest counter incrementer 1308 and to thememory 1300 sends the new transparent cache switching service connection request to the Internet if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined transparent cache switching service connection rate limit. If the service is distributed over multiple caches and the request is for one of the caches, the new transparent cache switching service connectionrequest Internet sender 1310 may send the new transparent cache switching service connection request to the Internet if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined transparent cache switching service connection rate limit for the cache. The connection rate limit may be a number of connections per predetermined time interval. - While embodiments and applications of this invention have been shown and described, it would be apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure that many more modifications than mentioned above are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The invention, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the appended claims.
Claims (24)
1. A computer implemented method for firewall load balancing connection rate limiting, the method comprising:
incrementing, by a computing platform of a network switch, a counter each time a new connection request for a destination firewall load balancing service is received and a firewall is selected from a plurality of firewalls of the firewall load balancing service to handle the new connection request, the request identifying the destination firewall load balancing service, the counter indicating a total number of times the destination firewall load balancing service has been requested within a predetermined time interval by examining a destination address of the request; and
directing, by the computing platform, the new destination firewall load balancing service connection request to a particular one of the plurality of firewalls of the destination firewall load balancing service, if the counter has not increased at a rate exceeding the predetermined connection rate limit.
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising resetting the counter to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the predetermined connection rate limit is a number of transactions per predetermined time interval.
4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising detecting a new firewall load balancing service connection request by looking at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the incrementing is based at least in part on the identification of the destination firewall load balancing service.
6. A computer implemented method for firewall load balancing connection rate limiting, the method comprising:
incrementing, by a computing platform of a network switch, a counter each time a new connection request for a destination firewall load balancing service is received and a firewall is selected from a plurality of firewalls of the firewall load balancing service to handle the new connection request, the request identifying the destination firewall load balancing service, the counter indicating a total number of times the destination firewall load balancing service has been requested within a predetermined time interval by examining a destination address of the request; and
dropping, by the computing platform, the new connection requests for the firewall load balancing service if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined connection rate limit for the firewall load balancing service.
7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising resetting the counter to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval.
8. The method of claim 7 wherein the predetermined connection rate limit is a number of transactions per predetermined time interval.
9. The method of claim 6 , further comprising detecting a new firewall load balancing service connection request by looking at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet.
10. The method of claim 6 wherein the incrementing is based at least in part on the identification of the destination firewall load balancing service.
11. An apparatus for firewall load balancing connection rate limiting, the apparatus comprising:
a memory; and
a computing platform of a network switch, the computing platform configured to:
increment a counter each time a new connection request for a destination firewall load balancing service is received and a firewall is selected from a plurality of firewalls of the firewall load balancing service to handle the new connection request, the request identifying the destination firewall load balancing service, the counter indicating a total number of times the destination firewall load balancing service has been requested within a predetermined time interval by examining a destination address of the request; and
direct the new destination firewall load balancing service connection request to a particular one of the plurality of firewalls of the destination firewall load balancing service, if the counter has not increased at a rate exceeding the predetermined connection rate limit.
12. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein the computing platform is further configured to reset the counter to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval.
13. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the predetermined connection rate limit is a number of transactions per predetermined time interval.
14. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein the computing platform is further configured to detect a new firewall load balancing service connection request by looking at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet.
15. The method of claim 11 wherein the incrementing is based at least in part on the identification of the destination firewall load balancing service.
16. An apparatus for firewall load balancing connection rate limiting, the apparatus comprising:
a memory; and
a computing platform of a network switch, the computing platform configured to:
increment a counter each time a new connection request for a destination firewall load balancing service is received and a firewall is selected from a plurality of firewalls of the firewall load balancing service to handle the new connection request, the request identifying the destination firewall load balancing service, the counter indicating a total number of times the destination firewall load balancing service has been requested within a predetermined time interval by examining a destination address of the request; and
drop the new connection requests for the firewall load balancing service if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined connection rate limit for the firewall load balancing service.
17. The apparatus of claim 16 wherein the computing platform is further configured to reset the counter to zero if the elapsed time since the last counter reset is greater than a predetermined time interval.
18. The apparatus of claim 17 wherein the predetermined connection rate limit is a number of transactions per predetermined time interval.
19. The apparatus of claim 16 wherein the computing platform is further configured to detect a new firewall load balancing service connection request by looking at a SYN bit of an incoming transmission control protocol (TCP) packet.
20. The apparatus of claim 16 wherein the incrementing is based at least in part on the identification of the destination firewall load balancing service.
21. An apparatus for firewall load balancing connection rate limiting, the apparatus comprising:
a memory;
means for incrementing, by a computing platform of a network switch, a counter each time a new connection request for a destination firewall load balancing service is received and a firewall is selected from a plurality of firewalls of the firewall load balancing service to handle the new connection request, the request identifying the destination firewall load balancing service, the counter indicating a total number of times the destination firewall load balancing service has been requested within a predetermined time interval by examining a destination address of the request; and
means for directing, by the computing platform, the new destination firewall load balancing service connection request to a particular one of the plurality of firewalls of the destination firewall load balancing service, if the counter has not increased at a rate exceeding the predetermined connection rate limit.
22. An apparatus for firewall load balancing connection rate limiting, the apparatus comprising:
a memory;
means for incrementing, by a computing platform of a network switch, a counter each time a new connection request for a destination firewall load balancing service is received and a firewall is selected from a plurality of firewalls of the firewall load balancing service to handle the new connection request, the request identifying the destination firewall load balancing service, the counter indicating a total number of times the destination firewall load balancing service has been requested within a predetermined time interval by examining a destination address of the request; and
means for dropping, by the computing platform, the new connection requests for the firewall load balancing service if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined connection rate limit for the firewall load balancing service.
23. A program storage device readable by a machine, embodying a program of instructions executable by the machine to perform a method for firewall load balancing connection rate limiting, the method comprising:
incrementing, by a computing platform of a network switch, a counter each time a new connection request for a destination firewall load balancing service is received and a firewall is selected from a plurality of firewalls of the firewall load balancing service to handle the new connection request, the request identifying the destination firewall load balancing service, the counter indicating a total number of times the destination firewall load balancing service has been requested within a predetermined time interval by examining a destination address of the request; and
directing, by the computing platform, the new destination firewall load balancing service connection request to a particular one of the plurality of firewalls of the destination firewall load balancing service, if the counter has not increased at a rate exceeding the predetermined connection rate limit.
24. A program storage device readable by a machine, embodying a program of instructions executable by the machine to perform a method for firewall load balancing connection rate limiting, the method comprising:
incrementing, by a computing platform of a network switch, a counter each time a new connection request for a destination firewall load balancing service is received and a firewall is selected from a plurality of firewalls of the firewall load balancing service to handle the new connection request, the request identifying the destination firewall load balancing service, the counter indicating a total number of times the destination firewall load balancing service has been requested within a predetermined time interval by examining a destination address of the request; and
dropping, by the computing platform, the new connection requests for the firewall load balancing service if the counter increases at a rate exceeding a predetermined connection rate limit for the firewall load balancing service.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/723,615 US20110082947A1 (en) | 2002-05-03 | 2010-03-12 | Connection rate limiting |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/139,073 US7707295B1 (en) | 2002-05-03 | 2002-05-03 | Connection rate limiting |
US12/723,615 US20110082947A1 (en) | 2002-05-03 | 2010-03-12 | Connection rate limiting |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/139,073 Continuation US7707295B1 (en) | 2002-05-03 | 2002-05-03 | Connection rate limiting |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20110082947A1 true US20110082947A1 (en) | 2011-04-07 |
Family
ID=42112585
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/139,073 Expired - Fee Related US7707295B1 (en) | 2002-05-03 | 2002-05-03 | Connection rate limiting |
US12/723,615 Abandoned US20110082947A1 (en) | 2002-05-03 | 2010-03-12 | Connection rate limiting |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/139,073 Expired - Fee Related US7707295B1 (en) | 2002-05-03 | 2002-05-03 | Connection rate limiting |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7707295B1 (en) |
Cited By (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2014176461A1 (en) * | 2013-04-25 | 2014-10-30 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Systems and methods for network access control |
US9294503B2 (en) | 2013-08-26 | 2016-03-22 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Health monitor based distributed denial of service attack mitigation |
US9332066B2 (en) | 2002-05-03 | 2016-05-03 | Foundry Networks, Llc | Connection rate limiting for server load balancing and transparent cache switching |
US9537886B1 (en) | 2014-10-23 | 2017-01-03 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Flagging security threats in web service requests |
US9584318B1 (en) | 2014-12-30 | 2017-02-28 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Perfect forward secrecy distributed denial of service attack defense |
US9621575B1 (en) | 2014-12-29 | 2017-04-11 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Context aware threat protection |
US9722918B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-08-01 | A10 Networks, Inc. | System and method for customizing the identification of application or content type |
US9756071B1 (en) | 2014-09-16 | 2017-09-05 | A10 Networks, Inc. | DNS denial of service attack protection |
US9787581B2 (en) | 2015-09-21 | 2017-10-10 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Secure data flow open information analytics |
US9848013B1 (en) | 2015-02-05 | 2017-12-19 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Perfect forward secrecy distributed denial of service attack detection |
US9900343B1 (en) | 2015-01-05 | 2018-02-20 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Distributed denial of service cellular signaling |
US9906422B2 (en) | 2014-05-16 | 2018-02-27 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Distributed system to determine a server's health |
US9912555B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2018-03-06 | A10 Networks, Inc. | System and method of updating modules for application or content identification |
US10044582B2 (en) | 2012-01-28 | 2018-08-07 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Generating secure name records |
US10063591B1 (en) | 2015-02-14 | 2018-08-28 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Implementing and optimizing secure socket layer intercept |
US10187377B2 (en) | 2017-02-08 | 2019-01-22 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Caching network generated security certificates |
US10250475B2 (en) | 2016-12-08 | 2019-04-02 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Measurement of application response delay time |
US10341118B2 (en) | 2016-08-01 | 2019-07-02 | A10 Networks, Inc. | SSL gateway with integrated hardware security module |
US10382562B2 (en) | 2016-11-04 | 2019-08-13 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Verification of server certificates using hash codes |
US10397270B2 (en) | 2017-01-04 | 2019-08-27 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Dynamic session rate limiter |
US10469594B2 (en) | 2015-12-08 | 2019-11-05 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Implementation of secure socket layer intercept |
US10812348B2 (en) | 2016-07-15 | 2020-10-20 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Automatic capture of network data for a detected anomaly |
US20220070055A1 (en) * | 2020-08-26 | 2022-03-03 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Systems and methods for routing network messages |
Families Citing this family (32)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7707295B1 (en) * | 2002-05-03 | 2010-04-27 | Foundry Networks, Inc. | Connection rate limiting |
US7675854B2 (en) | 2006-02-21 | 2010-03-09 | A10 Networks, Inc. | System and method for an adaptive TCP SYN cookie with time validation |
US8584199B1 (en) | 2006-10-17 | 2013-11-12 | A10 Networks, Inc. | System and method to apply a packet routing policy to an application session |
US8312507B2 (en) | 2006-10-17 | 2012-11-13 | A10 Networks, Inc. | System and method to apply network traffic policy to an application session |
US9960967B2 (en) | 2009-10-21 | 2018-05-01 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Determining an application delivery server based on geo-location information |
US7970861B2 (en) * | 2009-11-18 | 2011-06-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Load balancing in a distributed computing environment |
US9215275B2 (en) | 2010-09-30 | 2015-12-15 | A10 Networks, Inc. | System and method to balance servers based on server load status |
US9609052B2 (en) | 2010-12-02 | 2017-03-28 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Distributing application traffic to servers based on dynamic service response time |
US8776207B2 (en) | 2011-02-16 | 2014-07-08 | Fortinet, Inc. | Load balancing in a network with session information |
US8897154B2 (en) * | 2011-10-24 | 2014-11-25 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Combining stateless and stateful server load balancing |
US9386088B2 (en) | 2011-11-29 | 2016-07-05 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Accelerating service processing using fast path TCP |
US9094364B2 (en) | 2011-12-23 | 2015-07-28 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Methods to manage services over a service gateway |
US9356872B2 (en) * | 2012-04-27 | 2016-05-31 | Level 3 Communications, Llc | Load balancing of network communications |
US8782221B2 (en) | 2012-07-05 | 2014-07-15 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Method to allocate buffer for TCP proxy session based on dynamic network conditions |
US10021174B2 (en) | 2012-09-25 | 2018-07-10 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Distributing service sessions |
US10002141B2 (en) | 2012-09-25 | 2018-06-19 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Distributed database in software driven networks |
US9843484B2 (en) | 2012-09-25 | 2017-12-12 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Graceful scaling in software driven networks |
CN108027805B (en) | 2012-09-25 | 2021-12-21 | A10网络股份有限公司 | Load distribution in a data network |
US9338225B2 (en) | 2012-12-06 | 2016-05-10 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Forwarding policies on a virtual service network |
US9531846B2 (en) | 2013-01-23 | 2016-12-27 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Reducing buffer usage for TCP proxy session based on delayed acknowledgement |
US9900252B2 (en) | 2013-03-08 | 2018-02-20 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Application delivery controller and global server load balancer |
WO2014144837A1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Processing data packets using a policy based network path |
WO2014179753A2 (en) | 2013-05-03 | 2014-11-06 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Facilitating secure network traffic by an application delivery controller |
US10027761B2 (en) | 2013-05-03 | 2018-07-17 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Facilitating a secure 3 party network session by a network device |
US10230770B2 (en) | 2013-12-02 | 2019-03-12 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Network proxy layer for policy-based application proxies |
US9942152B2 (en) | 2014-03-25 | 2018-04-10 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Forwarding data packets using a service-based forwarding policy |
US9942162B2 (en) | 2014-03-31 | 2018-04-10 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Active application response delay time |
US9992229B2 (en) | 2014-06-03 | 2018-06-05 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Programming a data network device using user defined scripts with licenses |
US9986061B2 (en) | 2014-06-03 | 2018-05-29 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Programming a data network device using user defined scripts |
US10129122B2 (en) | 2014-06-03 | 2018-11-13 | A10 Networks, Inc. | User defined objects for network devices |
US10581976B2 (en) | 2015-08-12 | 2020-03-03 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Transmission control of protocol state exchange for dynamic stateful service insertion |
US10243791B2 (en) | 2015-08-13 | 2019-03-26 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Automated adjustment of subscriber policies |
Citations (37)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4926480A (en) * | 1983-08-22 | 1990-05-15 | David Chaum | Card-computer moderated systems |
US5761507A (en) * | 1996-03-05 | 1998-06-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Client/server architecture supporting concurrent servers within a server with a transaction manager providing server/connection decoupling |
US5774660A (en) * | 1996-08-05 | 1998-06-30 | Resonate, Inc. | World-wide-web server with delayed resource-binding for resource-based load balancing on a distributed resource multi-node network |
US5956489A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1999-09-21 | Microsoft Corporation | Transaction replication system and method for supporting replicated transaction-based services |
US6044260A (en) * | 1997-09-02 | 2000-03-28 | Motorola, Inc. | Method of controlling the number of messages received by a personal messaging unit |
US6075772A (en) * | 1997-08-29 | 2000-06-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Methods, systems and computer program products for controlling data flow for guaranteed bandwidth connections on a per connection basis |
US6088452A (en) * | 1996-03-07 | 2000-07-11 | Northern Telecom Limited | Encoding technique for software and hardware |
US6195680B1 (en) * | 1998-07-23 | 2001-02-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Client-based dynamic switching of streaming servers for fault-tolerance and load balancing |
US6314465B1 (en) * | 1999-03-11 | 2001-11-06 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for load sharing on a wide area network |
US20010039585A1 (en) * | 1999-12-06 | 2001-11-08 | Leonard Primak | System and method for directing a client to a content source |
US20010042200A1 (en) * | 2000-05-12 | 2001-11-15 | International Business Machines | Methods and systems for defeating TCP SYN flooding attacks |
US20010047415A1 (en) * | 2000-01-31 | 2001-11-29 | Skene Bryan D. | Method and system for enabling persistent access to virtual servers by an ldns server |
US6336133B1 (en) * | 1997-05-20 | 2002-01-01 | America Online, Inc. | Regulating users of online forums |
US20020040400A1 (en) * | 1999-07-15 | 2002-04-04 | F5 Networks, Inc. | Method and system for storing load balancing information with an HTTP cookie |
US6381642B1 (en) * | 1999-10-21 | 2002-04-30 | Mcdata Corporation | In-band method and apparatus for reporting operational statistics relative to the ports of a fibre channel switch |
US6389448B1 (en) * | 1999-12-06 | 2002-05-14 | Warp Solutions, Inc. | System and method for load balancing |
US20020099831A1 (en) * | 2001-01-25 | 2002-07-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing requests for connection to a server |
US6438652B1 (en) * | 1998-10-09 | 2002-08-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Load balancing cooperating cache servers by shifting forwarded request |
US6457061B1 (en) * | 1998-11-24 | 2002-09-24 | Pmc-Sierra | Method and apparatus for performing internet network address translation |
US6526448B1 (en) * | 1998-12-22 | 2003-02-25 | At&T Corp. | Pseudo proxy server providing instant overflow capacity to computer networks |
US20030041146A1 (en) * | 2001-08-16 | 2003-02-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Connection allocation technology |
US6546423B1 (en) * | 1998-10-22 | 2003-04-08 | At&T Corp. | System and method for network load balancing |
US6587881B1 (en) * | 1999-04-09 | 2003-07-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Software server usage governor |
US6597661B1 (en) * | 1999-08-25 | 2003-07-22 | Watchguard Technologies, Inc. | Network packet classification |
US20040024861A1 (en) * | 2002-06-28 | 2004-02-05 | Coughlin Chesley B. | Network load balancing |
US6701415B1 (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 2004-03-02 | America Online, Inc. | Selecting a cache for a request for information |
US6763372B1 (en) * | 2000-07-06 | 2004-07-13 | Nishant V. Dani | Load balancing of chat servers based on gradients |
US20040162901A1 (en) * | 1998-12-01 | 2004-08-19 | Krishna Mangipudi | Method and apparatus for policy based class service and adaptive service level management within the context of an internet and intranet |
US6851062B2 (en) * | 2001-09-27 | 2005-02-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for managing denial of service attacks |
US6857025B1 (en) * | 2000-04-05 | 2005-02-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Highly scalable system and method of regulating internet traffic to server farm to support (min,max) bandwidth usage-based service level agreements |
US6883033B2 (en) * | 2001-02-20 | 2005-04-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for regulating incoming traffic to a server farm |
US7007092B2 (en) * | 2000-10-05 | 2006-02-28 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | Connection management system and method |
US7107609B2 (en) * | 2001-07-20 | 2006-09-12 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Stateful packet forwarding in a firewall cluster |
US7131140B1 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2006-10-31 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method for protecting a firewall load balancer from a denial of service attack |
US7584262B1 (en) * | 2002-02-11 | 2009-09-01 | Extreme Networks | Method of and system for allocating resources to resource requests based on application of persistence policies |
US7707295B1 (en) * | 2002-05-03 | 2010-04-27 | Foundry Networks, Inc. | Connection rate limiting |
US8554929B1 (en) * | 2002-05-03 | 2013-10-08 | Foundry Networks, Llc | Connection rate limiting for server load balancing and transparent cache switching |
-
2002
- 2002-05-03 US US10/139,073 patent/US7707295B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2010
- 2010-03-12 US US12/723,615 patent/US20110082947A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (38)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4926480A (en) * | 1983-08-22 | 1990-05-15 | David Chaum | Card-computer moderated systems |
US5956489A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1999-09-21 | Microsoft Corporation | Transaction replication system and method for supporting replicated transaction-based services |
US5761507A (en) * | 1996-03-05 | 1998-06-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Client/server architecture supporting concurrent servers within a server with a transaction manager providing server/connection decoupling |
US6088452A (en) * | 1996-03-07 | 2000-07-11 | Northern Telecom Limited | Encoding technique for software and hardware |
US5774660A (en) * | 1996-08-05 | 1998-06-30 | Resonate, Inc. | World-wide-web server with delayed resource-binding for resource-based load balancing on a distributed resource multi-node network |
US6336133B1 (en) * | 1997-05-20 | 2002-01-01 | America Online, Inc. | Regulating users of online forums |
US6075772A (en) * | 1997-08-29 | 2000-06-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Methods, systems and computer program products for controlling data flow for guaranteed bandwidth connections on a per connection basis |
US6044260A (en) * | 1997-09-02 | 2000-03-28 | Motorola, Inc. | Method of controlling the number of messages received by a personal messaging unit |
US6195680B1 (en) * | 1998-07-23 | 2001-02-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Client-based dynamic switching of streaming servers for fault-tolerance and load balancing |
US6438652B1 (en) * | 1998-10-09 | 2002-08-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Load balancing cooperating cache servers by shifting forwarded request |
US6546423B1 (en) * | 1998-10-22 | 2003-04-08 | At&T Corp. | System and method for network load balancing |
US6457061B1 (en) * | 1998-11-24 | 2002-09-24 | Pmc-Sierra | Method and apparatus for performing internet network address translation |
US20040162901A1 (en) * | 1998-12-01 | 2004-08-19 | Krishna Mangipudi | Method and apparatus for policy based class service and adaptive service level management within the context of an internet and intranet |
US6526448B1 (en) * | 1998-12-22 | 2003-02-25 | At&T Corp. | Pseudo proxy server providing instant overflow capacity to computer networks |
US6314465B1 (en) * | 1999-03-11 | 2001-11-06 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for load sharing on a wide area network |
US6701415B1 (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 2004-03-02 | America Online, Inc. | Selecting a cache for a request for information |
US6587881B1 (en) * | 1999-04-09 | 2003-07-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Software server usage governor |
US20020040400A1 (en) * | 1999-07-15 | 2002-04-04 | F5 Networks, Inc. | Method and system for storing load balancing information with an HTTP cookie |
US6597661B1 (en) * | 1999-08-25 | 2003-07-22 | Watchguard Technologies, Inc. | Network packet classification |
US6381642B1 (en) * | 1999-10-21 | 2002-04-30 | Mcdata Corporation | In-band method and apparatus for reporting operational statistics relative to the ports of a fibre channel switch |
US6389448B1 (en) * | 1999-12-06 | 2002-05-14 | Warp Solutions, Inc. | System and method for load balancing |
US20010039585A1 (en) * | 1999-12-06 | 2001-11-08 | Leonard Primak | System and method for directing a client to a content source |
US20010047415A1 (en) * | 2000-01-31 | 2001-11-29 | Skene Bryan D. | Method and system for enabling persistent access to virtual servers by an ldns server |
US6857025B1 (en) * | 2000-04-05 | 2005-02-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Highly scalable system and method of regulating internet traffic to server farm to support (min,max) bandwidth usage-based service level agreements |
US20010042200A1 (en) * | 2000-05-12 | 2001-11-15 | International Business Machines | Methods and systems for defeating TCP SYN flooding attacks |
US6763372B1 (en) * | 2000-07-06 | 2004-07-13 | Nishant V. Dani | Load balancing of chat servers based on gradients |
US7007092B2 (en) * | 2000-10-05 | 2006-02-28 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | Connection management system and method |
US7131140B1 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2006-10-31 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method for protecting a firewall load balancer from a denial of service attack |
US20020099831A1 (en) * | 2001-01-25 | 2002-07-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing requests for connection to a server |
US6883033B2 (en) * | 2001-02-20 | 2005-04-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for regulating incoming traffic to a server farm |
US7107609B2 (en) * | 2001-07-20 | 2006-09-12 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Stateful packet forwarding in a firewall cluster |
US20030041146A1 (en) * | 2001-08-16 | 2003-02-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Connection allocation technology |
US6851062B2 (en) * | 2001-09-27 | 2005-02-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for managing denial of service attacks |
US7584262B1 (en) * | 2002-02-11 | 2009-09-01 | Extreme Networks | Method of and system for allocating resources to resource requests based on application of persistence policies |
US8572228B2 (en) * | 2002-05-03 | 2013-10-29 | Foundry Networks, Llc | Connection rate limiting for server load balancing and transparent cache switching |
US7707295B1 (en) * | 2002-05-03 | 2010-04-27 | Foundry Networks, Inc. | Connection rate limiting |
US8554929B1 (en) * | 2002-05-03 | 2013-10-08 | Foundry Networks, Llc | Connection rate limiting for server load balancing and transparent cache switching |
US20040024861A1 (en) * | 2002-06-28 | 2004-02-05 | Coughlin Chesley B. | Network load balancing |
Cited By (35)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9332066B2 (en) | 2002-05-03 | 2016-05-03 | Foundry Networks, Llc | Connection rate limiting for server load balancing and transparent cache switching |
US10044582B2 (en) | 2012-01-28 | 2018-08-07 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Generating secure name records |
US9722918B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-08-01 | A10 Networks, Inc. | System and method for customizing the identification of application or content type |
US10594600B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2020-03-17 | A10 Networks, Inc. | System and method for customizing the identification of application or content type |
US9912555B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2018-03-06 | A10 Networks, Inc. | System and method of updating modules for application or content identification |
US10708150B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2020-07-07 | A10 Networks, Inc. | System and method of updating modules for application or content identification |
US10581907B2 (en) | 2013-04-25 | 2020-03-03 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Systems and methods for network access control |
WO2014176461A1 (en) * | 2013-04-25 | 2014-10-30 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Systems and methods for network access control |
US9838425B2 (en) | 2013-04-25 | 2017-12-05 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Systems and methods for network access control |
US10091237B2 (en) | 2013-04-25 | 2018-10-02 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Systems and methods for network access control |
US9294503B2 (en) | 2013-08-26 | 2016-03-22 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Health monitor based distributed denial of service attack mitigation |
US10187423B2 (en) | 2013-08-26 | 2019-01-22 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Health monitor based distributed denial of service attack mitigation |
US9860271B2 (en) | 2013-08-26 | 2018-01-02 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Health monitor based distributed denial of service attack mitigation |
US9906422B2 (en) | 2014-05-16 | 2018-02-27 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Distributed system to determine a server's health |
US10686683B2 (en) | 2014-05-16 | 2020-06-16 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Distributed system to determine a server's health |
US9756071B1 (en) | 2014-09-16 | 2017-09-05 | A10 Networks, Inc. | DNS denial of service attack protection |
US9537886B1 (en) | 2014-10-23 | 2017-01-03 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Flagging security threats in web service requests |
US10505964B2 (en) | 2014-12-29 | 2019-12-10 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Context aware threat protection |
US9621575B1 (en) | 2014-12-29 | 2017-04-11 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Context aware threat protection |
US9584318B1 (en) | 2014-12-30 | 2017-02-28 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Perfect forward secrecy distributed denial of service attack defense |
US9900343B1 (en) | 2015-01-05 | 2018-02-20 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Distributed denial of service cellular signaling |
US9848013B1 (en) | 2015-02-05 | 2017-12-19 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Perfect forward secrecy distributed denial of service attack detection |
US10834132B2 (en) | 2015-02-14 | 2020-11-10 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Implementing and optimizing secure socket layer intercept |
US10063591B1 (en) | 2015-02-14 | 2018-08-28 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Implementing and optimizing secure socket layer intercept |
US9787581B2 (en) | 2015-09-21 | 2017-10-10 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Secure data flow open information analytics |
US10469594B2 (en) | 2015-12-08 | 2019-11-05 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Implementation of secure socket layer intercept |
US10812348B2 (en) | 2016-07-15 | 2020-10-20 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Automatic capture of network data for a detected anomaly |
US10341118B2 (en) | 2016-08-01 | 2019-07-02 | A10 Networks, Inc. | SSL gateway with integrated hardware security module |
US10382562B2 (en) | 2016-11-04 | 2019-08-13 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Verification of server certificates using hash codes |
US10250475B2 (en) | 2016-12-08 | 2019-04-02 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Measurement of application response delay time |
US10397270B2 (en) | 2017-01-04 | 2019-08-27 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Dynamic session rate limiter |
USRE47924E1 (en) | 2017-02-08 | 2020-03-31 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Caching network generated security certificates |
US10187377B2 (en) | 2017-02-08 | 2019-01-22 | A10 Networks, Inc. | Caching network generated security certificates |
US20220070055A1 (en) * | 2020-08-26 | 2022-03-03 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Systems and methods for routing network messages |
US11765020B2 (en) * | 2020-08-26 | 2023-09-19 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Systems and methods for routing network messages |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7707295B1 (en) | 2010-04-27 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7707295B1 (en) | Connection rate limiting | |
US9332066B2 (en) | Connection rate limiting for server load balancing and transparent cache switching | |
US11924170B2 (en) | Methods and systems for API deception environment and API traffic control and security | |
US10511624B2 (en) | Mitigating a denial-of-service attack in a cloud-based proxy service | |
US7725939B2 (en) | System and method for identifying an efficient communication path in a network | |
US7774492B2 (en) | System, method and computer program product to maximize server throughput while avoiding server overload by controlling the rate of establishing server-side net work connections | |
US6738814B1 (en) | Method for blocking denial of service and address spoofing attacks on a private network | |
US8887265B2 (en) | Named sockets in a firewall | |
US8661544B2 (en) | Detecting botnets | |
US7020783B2 (en) | Method and system for overcoming denial of service attacks | |
WO2008004076A2 (en) | Router and method for server load balancing | |
JP2004507978A (en) | System and method for countering denial of service attacks on network nodes | |
US11178108B2 (en) | Filtering for network traffic to block denial of service attacks | |
US20080104688A1 (en) | System and method for blocking anonymous proxy traffic | |
US11616796B2 (en) | System and method to protect resource allocation in stateful connection managers | |
US20040243843A1 (en) | Content server defending system | |
US8819252B1 (en) | Transaction rate limiting | |
Cao et al. | The research on the detection and defense method of the smurf-type DDos attack | |
Agarwal et al. | Lattice: A Scalable Layer-Agnostic Packet Classification Framework | |
AU2008348253A1 (en) | Method and system for controlling a computer application program | |
Demir et al. | Real-time protection against DDoS attacks using active gateways | |
Chowdhury et al. | Packet Classification with Explicit Coordination | |
Sharma et al. | Web Switching |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC, CALIFORNIA Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:FOUNDRY NETWORKS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:024733/0739 Effective date: 20090511 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: FOUNDRY NETWORKS, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SZETO, RONALD W.;CHEUNG, DAVID CHUN YING;JALAN, RAJKUMAR;REEL/FRAME:026227/0645 Effective date: 20020502 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |