US20030008395A1 - Process for growing tissue in a biocompatible macroporous polymer scaffold and products therefrom - Google Patents

Process for growing tissue in a biocompatible macroporous polymer scaffold and products therefrom Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20030008395A1
US20030008395A1 US10/216,877 US21687702A US2003008395A1 US 20030008395 A1 US20030008395 A1 US 20030008395A1 US 21687702 A US21687702 A US 21687702A US 2003008395 A1 US2003008395 A1 US 2003008395A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
polymer
scaffold
particles
polymer scaffold
scaffolds
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US10/216,877
Other versions
US6875442B2 (en
Inventor
Chantal Holy
Molly Shoichet
John Davies
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Bonetec Corp
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from CA002221195A external-priority patent/CA2221195A1/en
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US10/216,877 priority Critical patent/US6875442B2/en
Assigned to SHOICHET, MOLLY SANDRA, HOLY, CHANTAL ELIZABETH, DAVIES, JOHN EDWARD reassignment SHOICHET, MOLLY SANDRA ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO, THE
Assigned to BONETEC CORPORATION reassignment BONETEC CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: DAVIES, JOHN EDWARD, HOLY, CHANTAL ELIZABETH, SHOICHET, MOLLY SANDRA
Assigned to GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO, THE reassignment GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO, THE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: DAVIES, JOHN EDWARD, HOLY, CHANTAL ELIZABETH, SHOICHET, MOLLY SANDRA
Publication of US20030008395A1 publication Critical patent/US20030008395A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US6875442B2 publication Critical patent/US6875442B2/en
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N5/00Undifferentiated human, animal or plant cells, e.g. cell lines; Tissues; Cultivation or maintenance thereof; Culture media therefor
    • C12N5/0068General culture methods using substrates
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L27/00Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
    • A61L27/14Macromolecular materials
    • A61L27/18Macromolecular materials obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L27/00Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
    • A61L27/36Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix
    • A61L27/38Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix containing added animal cells
    • A61L27/3804Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix containing added animal cells characterised by specific cells or progenitors thereof, e.g. fibroblasts, connective tissue cells, kidney cells
    • A61L27/3821Bone-forming cells, e.g. osteoblasts, osteocytes, osteoprogenitor cells
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L27/00Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
    • A61L27/36Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix
    • A61L27/38Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix containing added animal cells
    • A61L27/3839Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix containing added animal cells characterised by the site of application in the body
    • A61L27/3843Connective tissue
    • A61L27/3847Bones
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L27/00Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
    • A61L27/50Materials characterised by their function or physical properties, e.g. injectable or lubricating compositions, shape-memory materials, surface modified materials
    • A61L27/56Porous materials, e.g. foams or sponges
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N11/00Carrier-bound or immobilised enzymes; Carrier-bound or immobilised microbial cells; Preparation thereof
    • C12N11/02Enzymes or microbial cells immobilised on or in an organic carrier
    • C12N11/08Enzymes or microbial cells immobilised on or in an organic carrier the carrier being a synthetic polymer
    • C12N11/089Enzymes or microbial cells immobilised on or in an organic carrier the carrier being a synthetic polymer obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
    • C12N11/096Polyesters; Polyamides
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2533/00Supports or coatings for cell culture, characterised by material
    • C12N2533/30Synthetic polymers
    • C12N2533/40Polyhydroxyacids, e.g. polymers of glycolic or lactic acid (PGA, PLA, PLGA); Bioresorbable polymers

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the use of a biodegradable polymer scaffold for tissue engineering applications. More particularly, the present invention relates to a novel macroporous polymer scaffold having a high level of interconnectivity between macropores.
  • Tissue Engineering involves the development of a new generation of biomaterials capable of specific interactions with biological tissues to yield functional tissue equivalents.
  • the underlying concept is that cells can be isolated from a patient, expanded in cell culture and seeded onto a scaffold prepared from a specific biomaterial to form a scaffold/biological composite called a “TE construct”.
  • the construct can then be grafted into the same patient to function as a replacement tissue.
  • Some such systems are useful for organ tissue replacement where there is a limited availability of donor organs or where, in some cases (e.g. young patients) inadequate natural replacements are available.
  • the scaffold itself may act as a delivery vehicle for biologically active moieties from growth factors, genes and drugs. This revolutionary approach to surgery has extensive applications with benefits to both patient well-being and the advancement of health care systems.
  • tissue engineering to the growth of bone tissue involves harvesting osteogenic stem cells, seeding them and allowing them to grow to produce a new tissue in vitro. The newly obtained tissue can then be used as an autograft.
  • Biodegradable polyesters in particular poly(lactide-co-glycolide)s—have been used as scaffolds for tissue engineering of several different cell populations, for example: chondrocytes (as described by Freed et al. in the J. of Biomed. Mater. Res. 27:11-13,1993), hepatocytes (as described by Mooney et al. in the Journal of Biomedical Mat. Res.
  • the method of producing polymer scaffolds disclosed in Thomson et al., Fabrication of Biodegradable Polymer Scaffolds to Engineer Trabecular Bone”, J. Biomater. Sci. Polymer Edn. Vol. 7, No.1 pp. 23-38, 1995 VSP involves formation of gelatin beads, after which a polymer is then “melted” at 80° C. and 333 g pressure around the beads after which the bead/polymer composite is cooled down, and the gelatin is leached out in distilled deionized water.
  • the polymer is forming sheets of material around the beads and is in a solid state before the leaching of the beads/particulate.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,338,772 issued to Bauer et al. is directed to an implant material which is a composite of calcium phosphate ceramic particles and a bioadsorbable polymer.
  • calcium phosphate powder is mixed with a polymer and the mixture is subjected to microwave energy which melts the polymer to a liquid that forms a polymer coating around the particles with polymer bridges between encased particles.
  • polymer scaffolds characterized by macropores in the millimeter size range with interconnections as seen in trabecular bone are particularly useful for tissue engineering as they allow cell ingrowth which is crucial for the development of three-dimensional tissue.
  • Such polymer scaffolds can be prepared using a novel process which combines the techniques of phase-inversion and particulate-leaching.
  • a polymer scaffold comprising macropores, ranging in size between 0.5 mm to 3.5 mm, and having an interconnecting porosity similar to that found in human trabecular bone.
  • the present invention provides a macroporous polymer scaffold with a trabecular morphology having a porosity of at least 50%, including interrupted pore walls and polymer struts defining macropores which have a mean diameter in a range from about 0.5 to about 3.5 mm and are interconnected by macroporous passageways.
  • a process for growing tissue, with pervasive distribution, in a macroporous polymer scaffold including macropores to a depth of at least 2.5 times an average macropore size in the scaffold comprising the steps of:
  • FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic representation of a portion of a polymer pore system illustrating different components as defined hereinafter;
  • FIG. 2 is a light micrograph of the bone trabeculae in the neck of the femora showing the isotropic and anisotropic areas (Modified light micrograph from Tobin W J, in J. Bone Jt Surg 37A(1)57-72, 1955);
  • FIG. 3C is a scanning electron micrograph of the pore walls of the polymer scaffold of FIG. 3A;
  • FIG. 4A is a chart illustrating the stress/strength curve of the polymer scaffolds when submitted to a compressive test at a rate of 1% deformation per second;
  • FIG. 4B is a chart illustrating the effect of polymer concentration on mechanical properties of polymer scaffolds.
  • the Young Modulus of the first elastic region is referred to Y 1 and the Young Modulus of the second elastic region is referred to Y 2 ;
  • FIG. 5 is a scanning electron micrograph of the pore wall structure of a scaffold prepared with a concentration of 0.05 g/ml PLGA 75:25 in DMSO;
  • FIG. 6 is a scanning electron micrograph of the pore wall structure of a scaffold prepared with a concentration of 0.2 g/ml PLGA 75:25 in DMSO;
  • FIG. 7A is a scanning electron micrograph of PLGA 75/25 scaffolds obtained using particles less than 0.35 mm;
  • FIG. 7B is a scanning electron micrograph of PLGA 75/25 scaffolds obtained using particles ranging from 0.54 t 0.8 mm;
  • FIG. 7C is a scanning electron micrograph of PLGA 75/25 scaffolds obtained using particles ranging from 0.8 to 2.0 mm;
  • FIG. 8 is a scanning electron micrograph of a PLGA 75/25 membrane prepared in absence of particles
  • FIG. 10 is a scanning electron micrograph of leaflet CaP coating a PLGA 75/25 scaffold
  • FIG. 16A is a scanning electron micrograph of a prior art PLGA 75/25 membranous scaffold created with particles less than 0.35 mm;
  • FIG. 16B is a scanning electron micrograph of a prior art PLGA 75/25 membranous scaffold created with particles ranging in size from 0.54 to 0.8 mm.
  • FIG. 16C is a scanning electron micrograph of a prior art PLGA 75/25 membranous scaffold created with particles ranging in size from 0.8 to 2.0 mm;
  • FIG. 16D is a scanning electron micrograph of PLGA 75/25 Intermediate scaffold created with particles less than 0.35 mm;
  • FIG. 16E is a scanning electron micrograph of PLGA 75/25 Intermediate scaffold created with particles ranging in size from 0.54 to 0.8 mm;
  • FIG. 16F is a scanning electron micrograph of PLGA 75/25 Intermediate scaffold created with particles ranging in size from 0.8 to 2.0 mm;
  • FIG. 16G is a scanning electron micrograph of PLGA 75/25 Bone-like scaffold created with particles less than 0.35 mm;
  • FIG. 16H is a scanning electron micrograph of PLGA 75/25 Bone-like scaffold created with particles ranging in size from 0.54 to 0.8 mm;
  • FIG. 16I is a scanning electron micrograph of PLGA 75/25 Bone-like scaffold created with particles ranging in size from 0.8 to 2.0 mm.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic representation of a portion of a polymer scaffold showing two macropores defined by interrupted walls and struts discussed more fully below, the macropores being interconnected with each other by a macroporous interconnection. The two macropores are also connected to the surrounding macropores by microporous passageways (also referred to as micropores).
  • Scaffold device designed as a cell carrier for tissue engineering or related applications. This device has preferably a porous morphology to be colonized by cells. In the present invention the scaffold has an open-pore morphology.
  • Macropores voids within the polymer scaffold, delinated by interrupted walls and struts.
  • the macropores typically have a diameter between 0.5 and 3.5 mm.
  • Pore walls predominately formed from polymer struts that delineate the macropores but parts of the pore walls may be considered to be interrupted walls, i.e. small flat or planar plates. This is consistent with the definition of trabeculae by Martin R B (in CRC Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 10(3), 179-222, 1984), who described the trabeculae of bone as “a complex system of interrupted walls and struts”. Webster's New World Dictionary defines trabecula as “a) a small rod, bar or bundle of fibers b) small septum of fibers forming, with others of its kind, an essential part of the framework of an organ or part”.
  • the structure of the pore wall is defined as “lamellar”.
  • the struts may also exhibit isotropic morphologies in which the struts are widely separated from each other by mostly macroporous interconnections. Both lamellar and strut-like pore wall structures exhibit nanopores when sectioned.
  • Micropororous interconnections also called micropores or microporous passageways: Voids found in lamellar pore walls. Each strut or lamellae of polymer is separated from each other by elongated, parallel pore structures called micropores. The size of these pores is less than 200 ⁇ m. Micropores contribute to the overall interconnectivity of the scaffolds.
  • Macroporous interconnections also called macroporous passageways: these are passageways between lamellar arrays of pore walls, or between polymer struts. They contribute mostly to the interconnectivity of the macropores, and range in size between 200 ⁇ m and 2 mm.
  • Nanopores Voids found in the bulk of the polymer. Cross-sections of bulk polymer material, either from pore wall struts or pore wall lamellar structures, exhibit rounded concavities that may, or may not, perforate the entire polymer bulk material. These nanopores may result from trapped non-solvent within the bulk of the polymer, or from autocatalytic degradation of the bulk of the polymer. Nanopores are distributed in the walls of the scaffold. They only contribute to the overall interconnectivity of the macropores when they go through the entire bulk material.
  • Interconnections the flow passageways connecting the macropores with each other.
  • the interconnections comprise the macroporous interconnections (passageways), the microporous interconnections (passageways), and the nanopores that perforate the entire bulk material defined above.
  • the present invention provides a macroporous polymer scaffold comprising macropores and interconnections.
  • Macropores have a diameter in the range of 0.5-3.5 mm, and interconnections as seen in trabecular bone.
  • the morphology of the polymer scaffolds (also referred to as foam structures) disclosed herein is based on that of trabecular bone.
  • Trabecular bone has been shown to be metabolically the most active site in bone (as described by Rodan G A, in Bone 13, S3-S6 1992).
  • the specific open pore geometry of trabecular bone favorably affects bone formation and resorption, and is therefore of considerable interest in the context of bone tissue engineering: indeed, the design of an ideal scaffold for bone tissue engineering should also allow fast bone formation and resorption.
  • the morphology of bone trabeculae has therefore served as a model to create the new polymer scaffold structures disclosed herein.
  • the architecture of the trabeculae of bone depends on the anatomic site where the bone is found and, to a lesser extent, on the age of the patient.
  • Martin R B in CRC Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 10(3), 179-222, 1984 defines the trabeculae of bone as “a complex system of interrupted walls and struts” wherein the voids found between the trabeculae are called “marrow spaces”.
  • the directions of the trabeculae are irregular; however, a global organization of the trabecular geometry is sometimes visible and follows the forces acting on the bone. Areas where trabeculae follow a given direction are anisotropic whereas areas where trabeculae are disposed randomly are isotropic (cf. FIG. 2).
  • trabecular bone has been investigated for trabecular width, porosity, anisotropy, and general patterns like connectivity and star volume.
  • Light and scanning electron micrographs published on trabecular bone indicate that the marrow spaces delineated by trabeculae (i.e. pores) range from one to several millimeters in size and are interconnected with holes ranging from approx. 0.3 to one millimeter.
  • the polymer scaffold is preferably prepared from any biocompatible polymer.
  • biocompatible as it is used herein is meant to encompass polymers which are not toxic to cells and which allow cells to colonize thereon.
  • suitable polymers include poly(lactide), poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) of varying ratios, polystyrene, poly(glycolide), poly(acrylate)s, poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate), poly(vinyl alcohol), poly(carbonate), poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate), poly(anhydride), poly(ethylene), poly(propylene), poly(hydroxybutyrate), poly(hydroxyvalerate), poly(urethane)s, poly(ether urethane), poly(ester urethane), poly(arylate), poly(imide), poly(anhydride-co-imide), poly(aminoacids) and poly(phosphazene).
  • Biodegradable, aliphatic polyesters such as polylactic acid, and polymers derived therefrom, represent a particularly useful class of polymers in applications of the present scaffolds, which relate to cell transplantation due to the fact that they have already been approved for human clinical use.
  • a preferred polymer for use as scaffold is PLGA, particularly blends comprising more than 50% poly(DL-lactide) such as PLGA 85:15 and PLGA 75:25.
  • biodegradable polymer scaffolds are suitable for use in either, in vitro applications and/or in vivo cell transplantation.
  • the matrices may serve then as supports or scaffolds to allow cell growth to occur in vitro prior to implantation in vivo.
  • the scaffolds may also be used directly in vivo, without being pre-seeded with cells.
  • biodegradable polymer matrices in accordance with the present invention are particularly useful for the growth of three-dimensional tissue and may be used in the growth of connective tissues, like bone, cartilage, paradontal tissue, as well as dental tissues and other organs, such as liver or breast tissue.
  • a significant characteristic of the present polymer scaffold is the presence of macropores at least 50% of which have a diameter within the range of 0.5 to 3.5 mm, a range representative of that found in the human trabecular bone.
  • the macropores have a diameter of at least 1.0 mm, and most preferably, the macropores have a diameter between about 1.0 mm and 3.5 mm.
  • the scaffold is also characterized by a high level of interconnectivity which enhances both penetration of the scaffold by cells and nutrient flow to cells.
  • Macroporous interconnections of at least 0.35 mm provide an “open cell” environment in the polymer scaffold, which is important to encourage tissue growth throughout the scaffold, i.e. three-dimensional tissue growth.
  • the macropores are delineated by porous polymer walls that may or may not exhibit a lamellar structure.
  • Total thickness of the pore walls is no greater than about 0.4 mm, and preferably no greater than about 0.3 mm.
  • the degree of interconnectivity in the pore walls is dependent, upon other factors, of the processing temperatures.
  • a suprising and unexpected result is that each macropore is in flow communication with a significant number of neighboring macropores via both macro- and microporous interconnections.
  • the porosity of the polymer scaffold is at least at a level of 50% for all scaffolds obtained, as estimated using Northern Eclipse image analysis software and preferably at a level of greater than 50%.
  • the level of porosity of the present polymer scaffold also contributes to the “open cell” nature thereof, resulting in significant overlap between macropores (giving rise to the macroporous passageways) which defines the highly interconnected nature of the present scaffold and further enhances its utility as a scaffold for cell growth.
  • the level of porosity is preferably greater than about 75%, while the most preferred level of porosity is greater than about 85%.
  • the features of the present scaffold make it particularly suitable for use in tissue engineering and more notably, cell transplantation, because it provides a biocompatible scaffold that cells can colonize in a three-dimensional manner via the interconnected macroporous network of the scaffold. This is significant when considering the transplantation of any cells that yield tissues, especially those requiring neoangiogenesis such as bone tissue.
  • the scaffold when used for cell transplantation, is biodegradable, the degradation of which can be controlled such that cell growth may be simultaneous with the degradation of the scaffold.
  • the present polymer scaffold may be modified in order to enhance further its properties for use as a scaffold for cellular growth. Modifications typically effecting the structures used as support for cellular growth would also be suitable to modify the present polymer scaffold. Such modifications function to enhance biological response and include, for example, surface modifications with collagen, calcium phosphate, proteoglycans, proteins, peptides, carbohydrates and polysaccharides, or by acid/base treatment. Additionally, the polymer scaffold may serve as a reservoir for the delivery of active molecules, such as proteins, growth factors, etc. that enhance cellular function.
  • the present polymer scaffold can be made using a novel process which combines particulate leaching methodology with phase inversion methodology.
  • the selected polymer scaffold is prepared as a liquid polymer.
  • a liquid polymer is meant to refer to polymer in liquid form, either alone or admixed with another liquid. This may be done by mixing the polymer in a solvent to form a polymer solution.
  • any solvent generally useful to prepare a polymer solution can be used for this purpose, including dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), methylene chloride, ethyl acetate, chloroform, acetone, benzene, 2-butanone, carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, n-heptane, -hexane and n-pentane.
  • DMSO dimethylsulfoxide
  • methylene chloride ethyl acetate
  • chloroform acetone
  • benzene 2-butanone
  • carbon tetrachloride chloroform
  • n-heptane acetone
  • benzene 2-butanone
  • carbon tetrachloride chloroform
  • n-heptane acetone
  • benzene 2-butanone
  • carbon tetrachloride chloroform
  • n-heptane acetone
  • benzene 2-butanone
  • the liquid polymer is then admixed with particles of an appropriate size in connection with the particulate leaching phase of the process.
  • Particles having a diameter corresponding to the desired diameter of the macropores in the polymer scaffold are suitable, specifically particles having a diameter in the range of 0.5-3.5 mm. More preferably, the particles have a diameter of greater than 1.0 mm and most preferably, the particles have a diameter of between 1.0 and 2.0 mm.
  • suitable particles for admixture with the polymer include polysaccharides (such as glucose), organic and inorganic salts, proteins and lipids of an appropriate size which can be dissolved in a solvent other than a solvent for the polymer (i.e. a polymer non-solvent).
  • the amount of particles admixed with the polymer solution will again vary with the characteristics of the polymer used to make the present scaffold.
  • the polymer is subjected to a phase inversion (precipitation) step in which it is converted from a liquid to a solid.
  • phase inversion precipitation
  • This step is achieved by submerging the particulate polymer mixture in a polymer non-solvent, in other words a solvent in which the polymer is insoluble and in which the polymer precipitates.
  • polymer non-solvent include, for example, water, alcohol, 1-4 dioxane and aniline.
  • the step of precipitating the polymer-particulate mixture results in the formation of elongated struts that form the interrupted pore walls defining the macroscopic pores and the macroscopic passageways connecting the macroscopic pores.
  • the particles act as spacers separating the polymer struts. Therefore, the precipitated polymer does not form a coating that intimately envelops the particles, as is the case in previous methods, but results in an macroporous scaffold characterized by macropores interconnected by macroporous passageways.
  • the polymer mixture can be placed in a mold during the phase inversion step.
  • the liquid polymer can be stabilized around the particulates by, for example, freezing the polymer-particulate slurry.
  • the phase inversion process occurs simultaneously from all outer surfaces.
  • the polymer solvent is DMSO
  • the polymer mixture is cooled to a temperature less than or equal to 12° C., which is the freezing temperature of DMSO. Cooler temperatures, such as temperatures of less than 0° C. can also be used. A consequence of using low temperatures (for example, ⁇ 20° C.
  • Example 4 a polymer scaffold with a different morphology
  • gellation increasing viscosity
  • the polymer is subjected to particulate leaching.
  • a particulate solvent i.e. a solvent which functions to dissolve the particles dispersed throughout the polymer but does not dissolve the polymer itself.
  • suitable particulate solvents include water, alcohol, 1-4 dioxane and aniline. The temperature of the particulate solvent can be varied with minimal effect on the resulting polymer scaffold.
  • the temperature will generally be between the freezing point of the particulate solvent and the glass transition temperature of the polymer, so that the polymer scaffold does not melt or become viscous under the effect of the non-solvent temperature.
  • a particulate solvent temperature of between about 0° C. and 45° C. is applied when the particulate solvent is water and the polymer is PLGA 75:25.
  • the polymer is submerged in the particulate solvent for an amount of time appropriate to allow complete dissolution of the particles dispersed throughout the polymer scaffold. Generally, a period of at least 24 hours is required to obtain complete particulate dissolution in the polymer scaffold, while a period of at least 48 hours is preferred. In order to expedite efficient dissolution of the particles, it is desirable to immerse the polymer in fresh solvent at frequent intervals during the dissolution period, for example at approximately 8-9 hour intervals or by the use of a circulating solvent bath.
  • phase-inversion and particulate-leaching processes may occur in one step with a solvent that is simultaneously a polymer non-solvent and a particulate solvent.
  • a solvent that is simultaneously a polymer non-solvent and a particulate solvent.
  • double distilled water ddH 2 O was used as the solvent.
  • the polymer scaffold is removed from the particulate solvent following an appropriate particulate dissolution period and can be either vacuum-dried prior to use or disinfected in alcohol (such as 70% ethanol), rinsed and conditioned in culture medium for subsequent use.
  • the scaffold may also subsequently be sterilized for in vivo use, comprising the placing the scaffold in the chamber of a radio frequency glow discharge plasma instrument by applying preferably an argon gas (or other inert gas) radio-frequency glow discharge.
  • argon gas or other inert gas
  • a non-limiting process used a power of 100 W with the plasma sustained for 4 minutes.
  • Another sterilization method that may be used is a low temperature ethylene oxide (ETO) sterilization procedure which will be known to those skilled in the art.
  • ETO low temperature ethylene oxide
  • Another sterilization process that may be used is a gamma-sterilization procedure which will also yield sterile scaffolds.
  • the polymer scaffold is desirably stored dry in a desiccator to prevent moisture retention and possible degradation of the polymer.
  • the present process advantageously yields a polymer scaffold having unique characteristics, and in particular, yields a polymer scaffold having an interconnected macroporous network.
  • Another significant advantage of the present two-stage process is that it provides amplified means for controlling the morphology of the resulting polymer scaffold.
  • the process provides two levels, particulate leaching and phase inversion, at which to effect the morphology of the polymer scaffold.
  • macropore size and distribution can be altered during both, the particulate leaching and phase inversion stage of the process and are governed by particulate size and distribution, and, to a lesser extend by the scaffold processing temperatures.
  • interconnection formation and size can be influenced by varying the rate of the phase inversion.
  • the rate of the phase inversion can be altered altering a number of variables including temperature, type of polymer non-solvent and polymer concentration.
  • the final scaffold morphology can be controlled.
  • the resultant morphology resembles that of human trabecular bone.
  • a method for culturing cells for three-dimensional growth is provided utilizing the polymer scaffold described herein.
  • the novel interconnected macroporous structure of the present polymer scaffold is especially suitable for tissue engineering, and notably bone tissue engineering, an interesting alternative to currently available bone repair therapies.
  • bone marrow-derived cell seeding of the polymer scaffold is performed using conventional methods, which are well known to those of skill in the art (as described in Maniatopoulos et al, in Cell Tissue Res 254, 317-330, 1988). Cells are seeded onto the polymer scaffold and cultured under suitable growth conditions. The cultures are fed with media appropriate to establish the growth thereof.
  • cell types can be grown throughout the present polymer scaffold. More precisely, cell types includes hematopoietic or mesenchymal stem cells, and also includes cells yielding cardiovascular, muscular, or any connective tissue. Cells may be of human or other animal origin. However, the polymer scaffold of the present invention is particularly suited for the growth of osteogenic cells, especially cells that elaborate bone matrix. For tissue engineering, the cells may be of any origin. The cells are advantageously of human origin.
  • the present method of growing cells in a three dimensional polymer scaffold according to the invention allows seeded osteogenic cells, for example, to penetrate the polymer scaffold to elaborate bone matrix, during the in vitro stage, with pervasive distribution in the structure of the polymer scaffold and particularly to a depth of at least 2.5 times the depth of the average macropore size. Osteogenic cell penetration and, as a result, bone matrix elaboration can be enhanced by mechanical, ultrasonic, electric field or electronic means. While for many human or animal applications, such as bone or tissue replacement the polymer is biocompatible and non toxic, it may preferably be biodegradable also.
  • biocompatible polymer which is not biodegradable in situations where a permanent scaffold is needed to support other tissue.
  • biocompatibility and biodegradable need not be invoked, for example in applications where the scaffold is used as a filter or catalyst support these requirements may not be important.
  • a PLGA 75:25 polymer scaffold in accordance with the present invention was prepared using PLGA 75:25 (obtained from Birmingham Polymer Inc), having an inherent viscosity of 0.87 dL/g.
  • PLGA 75:25 obtained from Birmingham Polymer Inc
  • One ml of 0.1 g/ml of PLGA 75:25 in DMSO was mixed with 2 of glucose crystals (particle size ranging from 0.8 mm to 2 mm) in an aluminum mold.
  • the PLGA 75:25-DMSO mixture was cooled to ⁇ 20° C. This temperature of the PLGA 75:25-DMSO mixture is referred to T mix .
  • the frozen PLGA 75:25 blocks were then immersed in an ice-water slurry of ddH 2 O at 0° C., which is a non-solvent for the polymer. This temperature of the water is referred to T nonsolvent .
  • the blocks remained in ddH 2 O for 48 hours during which the ddH 2 O was changed approximately every 8 hours.
  • the obtained scaffolds were then removed from the water, vacuum-dried for 72 h at 0.01 mm Hg and stored at 4° C. in a desiccator under vacuum until use. Scaffolds obtained using the above mentioned conditions were then fully analyzed.
  • the macroporous structure of 2 mm thick polymer scaffold sections was observed at low magnification (16 ⁇ ) using a dissection microscope as shown in FIG. 3A.
  • the macropores exhibited elliptic morphologies and thick porous walls (about 300 ⁇ m thick) containing micropores.
  • FIG. 3B is a scanned scaffold section that identifies the porous components of the scaffold, the macropores, the macroporous interconnections (passageways) and the microporous interconnections (passageways).
  • a polymer thin film i.e. a skin layer was observed on the outer surface of the polymer scaffold.
  • the images were converted to TIFF files and analyzed on a PC computer using the Northern Eclipse image analysis software.
  • the “single measurement” menu was used to measure the pore wall sizes (area, perimeter, diameter etc.) for each scanned section.
  • the “data measure” routine computed the area and number of pore wall struts per scanned slide.
  • the porosity of the polymer matrices was also estimated by mercury porosimetry (Quantachrome Autoscan 60). A solid penetrometer with 5 cm 3 cell stem volume was used for samples in the range of 0.015 to 0.020 g. The values of void volume were calculated from the mercury intrusion volume. The porosity was calculated from the mercury intrusion volume to be 89.6%. The porosity estimated using the Northern Eclipse image analysis software ( ⁇ 87%) is substantially equivalent to that of ⁇ 90% as measured by mercury porosimetry given that the mercury porosimetry method is not accurate when analyzing polymer scaffolds with pore diameters greater than ⁇ 75 ⁇ m.
  • the polymer scaffold was also prepared for analysis using a scanning electron microscope (SEM).
  • SEM scanning electron microscope
  • the scaffold was cross-sectioned at a thickness of approximately 2 mm and sputter-coated with gold under argon atmosphere (Polaron Instrument Inc., Doylestown, Pa.). Scanning electron micrographs were taken on a Hitachi 2500 SEM at 15 kV acceleration voltage. The diameter of the macropores was confirmed using the SEM micrographs to be about 1 to 1.5 mm, although a clear separation between each macropore was not always observed illustrating the very open interconnected structure of these polymer scaffolds.
  • the polymer scaffold was mechanically tested as follows.
  • a polymer scaffold in the form of a cylinder with a diameter and a height of 1.5 cm was prepared and tested using an Instron Mechanical tester.
  • the mechanical experiments were performed on a uniaxial servohydraulic testing machine (Instron Model 1331 load frame with Series 2150 controller).
  • a 1 kg load cell (Sensotec, Model 31/4680) was used for all compression tests.
  • the deflection of the actuator was measured by a DC linearly variable differential transformer (LVDT, intertechnology Model SE 374). Signals from the load cell and the LVDT were displayed during testing on a digital storage oscilloscope (Gould, Model 1425).
  • the signals were also input into a 16-channel, 12-bit analog-to-digital (A/D) converter in an accelerated Apple IIe computer.
  • the rate of data acquisition for these experiments was 430 pairs of data points per second.
  • Compression of the polymer scaffold occurred at a rate of 0.1 mm/s
  • FIG. 4A A plot of compression strength vs. percent deformation of the polymer scaffold showed two moduli.
  • the Young's modulus for the first elastic region (referred to Y 1 ) was 0.76 ⁇ 0.12 MPa, and for the second elastic region (referred to Y 2 ) was 0.18 ⁇ 0.016 MPa.
  • each of the polymer scaffolds prepared were cut in half using a razor blade. A skin structure was found on each regardless of the starting concentration of PLGA 75:25 in DMSO. The mechanical properties of the 3 different polymer scaffolds were assessed and are illustrated in FIG. 4B. A significant decrease in Young's modulus was observed in the polymer scaffold prepared using the PLGA in DMSO of 0.05 mg/ml while the stiffest scaffold was obtained with a PLGA 75:25 concentration of 2 mg/ml.
  • the effect on polymer scaffold structure of both varying the amount and size of the glucose particles admixed with the PLGA polymer was determined as follows. Differing amounts of glucose particles (0.5 g, 1 g and 2 g) were separately admixed with 1 ml polymer solution, maintaining all other conditions as described in Example 1 constant. The effect of particle size on the final scaffold morphology was also assessed by using the following sieved particles: (standard testing sieves, VWR, West Chester, Pa.): 1) NaCl crystals ( ⁇ 0.35 mm), 2) sucrose crystals (0.54 mm ⁇ crystal size ⁇ 0.8 mm) and 3) glucose crystals (0.8 mm ⁇ crystal size ⁇ 2 mm).
  • the resulting polymer scaffolds were observed by light microscopy.
  • particulates i.e. 0.5 g/ml
  • the polymer solution was not fully immersed in the particulate bed.
  • This layer of polymer solution resulted after phase inversion in a membranous structure, similar to that seen when no particulates are used.
  • Larger solution densities of particulates i.e. 2.0 g/ml
  • the size of the macropores was directly proportional to the size of the particles used, e.g. macropore size were ⁇ 0.33 mm when particles ⁇ 0.35 mm were used (cf. FIG. 7A), and ⁇ 0.75 mm when particles ranging from 0.54 to 0.8 mm were used (cf. FIG. 7B). Finally for particles bigger than 0.8 mm, the observed macropores were ⁇ 1.4 mm (cf FIG. 7C).
  • the resulting polymer structure was a hollow cylinder composed of a thick skin containing micropores, as illustrated in FIG. 8. This skin closely resembled the membrane structure resulting from a normal phase-inversion process.
  • the scaffolds obtained for T mix ⁇ 20° C. and ⁇ 80° C. both had a skin structure.
  • T mix ⁇ 20° C.
  • the macropores seemed smaller than on scaffolds obtained at higher T mix and their sizes were estimated by SEM at ⁇ 1.8 mm.
  • the pore walls were lamellar, with fewer macroporous interconnections but more microporous interconnections (cf FIG. 9B). It was observed that the macropore size decreased with lower T mix .
  • T nonsolvent (0° C.) provided lamellar pore walls (cf FIG. 9B)
  • higher T nonsolvent (400° C.) provided strut-like pore wall morphologies (cf FIG. 9C).
  • the obtained scaffolds as described in Example 1 were further surface modified by acid/base treatment; plasma modification with ammonia gas; modification by ozone treatment; collagen deposition; calcium phosphate deposition and platelet rich plasma deposition.
  • the procedures and results were as follows:
  • Acid/base treatment was developed to enhance surface charge and to change the surface topography.
  • the scaffolds were maintained in several concentrations of acetic acid (0.1 M, 1 M, 5 M) for 24 h. Scaffolds were also maintained in various concentrations of NaOH for 24 h to observe surface polymer chain hydrolysis. Under SEM, the scaffolds treated with 5 M acetic acid or 0.1 M NaOH for 24 hours showed changes in surface topography with appearance of nanopores.
  • Plasma modification with ammonia gas was achieved by placing a scaffold in the chamber of a radio frequency glow discharge plasma instrument, evacuating the chamber and purging with ammonia.
  • the ammonia plasma was generated at powers between 33 W and 100 W for up to 10 min. Scaffolds treated this way were found to have more nitrogen and oxygen than unmodified counterparts and were more hydrophilic. These surface properties may enhance cell-material interactions, including cell adhesion and, spreading and tissue formation.
  • a collagen deposition experiment was designed to enhance cell adhesion on the polymer surfaces.
  • the scaffolds were maintained in 0.1% collagen for 1 h, 5 h, 8 h and 24 h.
  • a calcium phosphate deposition experiment was tested to enhance cell adhesion on the surface of the scaffolds. These were maintained for 1 week in fully supplemented medium (as described in Example 6) at 37° C. The calcium phosphate crystals on the surface of the scaffolds were visualized by Von Kossa staining.
  • a platelet-rich plasma deposition to increase in vivo responsiveness of the scaffolds in various tissues involves soaking the scaffolds in a platelet-rich plasma prior to use.
  • the bulk modulus of the polymer scaffold was reduced by addition of a plasticizer, thereby yielding scaffolds for use in soft tissue applications, such as, cardiovascular and/or muscular tissues.
  • Poly ethylene glycol (PEG) with a Mw of 5000 was added to a 1.0 g/ml solution of PLGA 75/25 in DMSO to a final weight ratio of PEG:PLGA of 0.5:1.
  • the PEG-PLGA solution was mixed with particulates, the polymer was precipitated and the particulates and PEG polymer were leached out in H 2 O, as described in Example 1. This process yielded a scaffold with enhanced nanoporosity and hence, lower bulk modulus.
  • PLGA 75:25 polymer scaffolds were prepared as previously described: 2 g/ml glucose crystals were dispersed in a 0.1 g /ml PLGA 75:25 solution in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, BDH, Toronto, ON). The polymer slurry was frozen at 11° C. The polymer was then precipitated and the glucose crystals were extracted from the precipitated polymer in ddH 2 O at 40° C. Scaffolds were dried to constant mass (10 ⁇ m Hg, 72 h), disinfected in 70% EtOH for ⁇ fraction (1/2 ) ⁇ h, rinsed 3 ⁇ with a-MEM and equilibrated in sterile a-MEM at 37° C. for 6 days.
  • DMSO dimethylsulfoxide
  • bone marrow-derived cells were collected from both femora of young adult male Wistar rats (approximately 150 g) into a fully supplemented medium (FSM): a-MEM supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum, 50 mg/mL ascorbic acid, 10 mM ⁇ -glycerophosphate and antibiotics (0.1 mg/mL penicillin G, 0.05 mg/mL gentamicin and 0.3 mg/mL fungizone); 10 ⁇ 8 M Dexamethasone (Dex) was added to the FSM of only Dex+ cultures.
  • FSM fully supplemented medium
  • Dex Dexamethasone
  • Tetracycline.HCl powder (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) was dissolved in a-MEM to prepare a stock solution of 90 mg/mL.
  • a new tetracycline-containing fully supplemented medium (TFSM) was prepared of a-MEM containing 15% fetal bovine serum, 50 mg/mL ascorbic acid, 10 mM a-glycerophosphate and 9 mg/ml of tetracycline. The TFSM was used for the last refeeding on day 40.
  • FIGS. 13 shows an osteocalcin-labeled scaffold seeded with Dex+ cells and maintained in culture for 6 weeks. Histological sections of the scaffolds were obtained as following: samples were embedded in Tissue Tek and sectioned vertically at a 6 mm thickness. Cell growth within the scaffolds was also observed from the histological sections. At low magnification, the entire scaffold section could be visualized by LM. In both Dex+ and Dex ⁇ cultures, cell coverage was found throughout the entire scaffold structure. Haematoxylin and eosin staining was visible along all the macropores, on the outer surfaces as well as in the middle of the scaffolds. FIGS.
  • PLGA 75:25 matrices were prepared as described in Example 1. These scaffolds were disinfected in 70% ethanol for 30 min prior to being seeded with human bone marrow stromal cells, from young donors, using protocols and dexamethasone (dex) containing media described in detail by Parker et al. (J. of Bone Min. Res., 12(1), S300:F298, 1997).
  • scaffolds obtained by particulate leaching only referred to as membranous scaffolds forming part of the prior art and shown in FIGS. 16A, 16B and 16 C discussed briefly below
  • the three scaffold structures were created with different macropore sizes, so that a total of nine different scaffold structures were obtained. These nine structures are illustrated in FIGS. 16A to 16 I.
  • Membranous scaffolds were created using a particulate leaching technique only (as described by Mikos et al, in Biomaterials 14, 323-330, 1993), see the prior art shown in FIGS. 16A, 16B and 16 C. Briefly, a PLGA 75/25 (Birmingham Polymers) solution in chloroform was cast over sieved particles, either 1) NaCl (size ⁇ 0.35 mm), 2) sucrose crystals (size ranging from 0.54 to 0.8 mm) or 3) glucose crystals (size ranging from 0.8 to 2 mm). The polymer structures were left at room temperature to allow chloroform evaporation, after which the particles were dissolved in ddH 2 O.

Abstract

A polymer scaffold is provided comprising an extensively interconnected macroporous network. The polymer scaffold embodies macropores having a diameter in a range of 0.5-3.5 mm, and preferably in a range of about 1.0-2.0 mm. The polymer scaffold is prepared using a novel process which advantageously combines the techniques of particulate leaching and phase inversion to render a process that provides amplified means by which to control the morphology of the resulting polymer scaffold. The polymer scaffold has utility in the area of tissue engineering, particularly as a scaffold for both in vitro and in vivo cell growth.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED U.S. PATENT APPLICATION
  • This patent application is a continuation-in-part patent application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/191,107 filed on Nov. 13, 1998 entitled BIODEGRADABLE POLYMER SCAFFOLD, which is currently pending and which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.[0001]
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to the use of a biodegradable polymer scaffold for tissue engineering applications. More particularly, the present invention relates to a novel macroporous polymer scaffold having a high level of interconnectivity between macropores. [0002]
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Bone treatments for injuries, genetic malformations and diseases often require implantation of grafts. It is well known that autografts and allografts are the safest implants; however, due to the limited supply and the risks of disease transmission and rejection encountered with these grafts, synthetic biomaterials have also been widely used as implants. Complications in vivo were observed with some of these biomaterials, as mechanical mismatches (stress shielding) and appearance of wear debris lead to bone atrophy, osteoporosis or osteolysis around the implants (Woo et al., 1976; Terjesen et al., 1988). [0003]
  • A new approach, defined as Tissue Engineering (TE), has recently raised a lot of interest. Tissue engineering involves the development of a new generation of biomaterials capable of specific interactions with biological tissues to yield functional tissue equivalents. The underlying concept is that cells can be isolated from a patient, expanded in cell culture and seeded onto a scaffold prepared from a specific biomaterial to form a scaffold/biological composite called a “TE construct”. The construct can then be grafted into the same patient to function as a replacement tissue. Some such systems are useful for organ tissue replacement where there is a limited availability of donor organs or where, in some cases (e.g. young patients) inadequate natural replacements are available. The scaffold itself may act as a delivery vehicle for biologically active moieties from growth factors, genes and drugs. This revolutionary approach to surgery has extensive applications with benefits to both patient well-being and the advancement of health care systems. [0004]
  • The application of tissue engineering to the growth of bone tissue involves harvesting osteogenic stem cells, seeding them and allowing them to grow to produce a new tissue in vitro. The newly obtained tissue can then be used as an autograft. Biodegradable polyesters—in particular poly(lactide-co-glycolide)s—have been used as scaffolds for tissue engineering of several different cell populations, for example: chondrocytes (as described by Freed et al. in the J. of Biomed. Mater. Res. 27:11-13,1993), hepatocytes (as described by Mooney et al. in the Journal of Biomedical Mat. Res. 29, 959-965, 1995) and most recently, bone marrow-derived cells (as described by Ishaug et al. in the J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 36: 17-28, 1997 and Holy et al., in Cells and Materials, 7, 223-234, 1997). Specifically, porous structures of these polyesters were prepared and seeded with cells; however, when bone marrow-derived cells were cultured on these porous structures, bone ingrowth only occurred within the outer edge of 3-D polymeric scaffold (Ishaug et al., supra; Holy et al., supra). Thus, the polymeric scaffolds prepared in these instances were inadequate to allow for the cell growth required to render tissue suitable for implantation or for use as an autograft. [0005]
  • The method of producing polymer scaffolds disclosed in Thomson et al., Fabrication of Biodegradable Polymer Scaffolds to Engineer Trabecular Bone”, J. Biomater. Sci. Polymer Edn. Vol. 7, No.1 pp. 23-38, 1995 VSP, involves formation of gelatin beads, after which a polymer is then “melted” at 80° C. and 333 g pressure around the beads after which the bead/polymer composite is cooled down, and the gelatin is leached out in distilled deionized water. The polymer is forming sheets of material around the beads and is in a solid state before the leaching of the beads/particulate. [0006]
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,338,772 issued to Bauer et al. is directed to an implant material which is a composite of calcium phosphate ceramic particles and a bioadsorbable polymer. In the method of preparation disclosed in Bauer, calcium phosphate powder is mixed with a polymer and the mixture is subjected to microwave energy which melts the polymer to a liquid that forms a polymer coating around the particles with polymer bridges between encased particles. [0007]
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • It has now been found that polymer scaffolds characterized by macropores in the millimeter size range with interconnections as seen in trabecular bone, are particularly useful for tissue engineering as they allow cell ingrowth which is crucial for the development of three-dimensional tissue. Such polymer scaffolds can be prepared using a novel process which combines the techniques of phase-inversion and particulate-leaching. [0008]
  • Accordingly, in one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a polymer scaffold comprising macropores, ranging in size between 0.5 mm to 3.5 mm, and having an interconnecting porosity similar to that found in human trabecular bone. [0009]
  • The present invention provides a macroporous polymer scaffold with a trabecular morphology having a porosity of at least 50%, including interrupted pore walls and polymer struts defining macropores which have a mean diameter in a range from about 0.5 to about 3.5 mm and are interconnected by macroporous passageways. [0010]
  • In another aspect of the present invention, a process for making a polymer scaffold is provided comprising the steps of [0011]
  • mixing liquid polymer with particles to form a particulate-polymer mixture; [0012]
  • submerging the particulate-polymer mixture in a polymer non-solvent to precipitate said polymer producing a solidified particulate-polymer mixture; and [0013]
  • submerging the solidified particulate-polymer mixture into a particulate solvent for a time sufficient to dissolve the particles. [0014]
  • In another aspect of the invention there is provided a process for growing tissue, with pervasive distribution, in a macroporous polymer scaffold including macropores to a depth of at least 2.5 times an average macropore size in the scaffold, comprising the steps of: [0015]
  • synthesizing a macroporous polymer scaffold with a trabecular morphology having a porosity of at least 50%, including interrupted pore walls and polymer struts defining macropores which have a mean diameter in a range from about 0.5 to about 3.5 mm and are interconnected by macroporous passageways having a size in a range from about 200 μm to about 2 mm; [0016]
  • seeding the polymer scaffold with tissue cells; and [0017]
  • culturing said tissue cells.[0018]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Embodiments of the present invention are described in greater detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and computer digitized micrographs, in which: [0019]
  • FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic representation of a portion of a polymer pore system illustrating different components as defined hereinafter; [0020]
  • FIG. 2 is a light micrograph of the bone trabeculae in the neck of the femora showing the isotropic and anisotropic areas (Modified light micrograph from Tobin W J, in J. Bone Jt Surg 37A(1)57-72, 1955); [0021]
  • FIG. 3A is a light micrograph of a polymer in accordance with the present invention (field width=1.8 cm); [0022]
  • FIG. 3B is a light micrograph of a 20 μm section of the polymer scaffold of FIG. 3A (field width=3.5 mm); [0023]
  • FIG. 3C is a scanning electron micrograph of the pore walls of the polymer scaffold of FIG. 3A; [0024]
  • FIG. 4A is a chart illustrating the stress/strength curve of the polymer scaffolds when submitted to a compressive test at a rate of 1% deformation per second; [0025]
  • FIG. 4B is a chart illustrating the effect of polymer concentration on mechanical properties of polymer scaffolds. The Young Modulus of the first elastic region is referred to Y[0026] 1 and the Young Modulus of the second elastic region is referred to Y2;
  • FIG. 5 is a scanning electron micrograph of the pore wall structure of a scaffold prepared with a concentration of 0.05 g/ml PLGA 75:25 in DMSO; [0027]
  • FIG. 6 is a scanning electron micrograph of the pore wall structure of a scaffold prepared with a concentration of 0.2 g/ml PLGA 75:25 in DMSO; [0028]
  • FIG. 7A is a scanning electron micrograph of PLGA 75/25 scaffolds obtained using particles less than 0.35 mm; [0029]
  • FIG. 7B is a scanning electron micrograph of PLGA 75/25 scaffolds obtained using particles ranging from 0.54 t 0.8 mm; [0030]
  • FIG. 7C is a scanning electron micrograph of PLGA 75/25 scaffolds obtained using particles ranging from 0.8 to 2.0 mm; [0031]
  • FIG. 8 is a scanning electron micrograph of a PLGA 75/25 membrane prepared in absence of particles; [0032]
  • FIG. 9A is a scanning electron micrograph of a PLGA 75/25 foam obtained at T[0033] mix=11° C., and Tnonsolvent=0° C.;
  • FIG. 9B is a scanning electron micrograph of a PLGA 75/25 foam obtained at T[0034] mix=−20° C., and Tnonsolvent=0° C.;
  • FIG. 9C is a scanning electron micrograph of a PLGA 75/25 foam obtained at T[0035] mix=−20° C., and Tnonsolvent=40° C.;
  • FIG. 10 is a scanning electron micrograph of leaflet CaP coating a PLGA 75/25 scaffold; [0036]
  • FIG. 11 is a confocal micrograph of a Dex+scaffold cultured for 42 days (field width=1.8 mm); [0037]
  • FIG. 12 is a UV-light illuminated light micrograph of a Dex+scaffold stained with tetracycline (Field width=2.0 cm); [0038]
  • FIG. 13 is a light micrograph of an osteocalcin immunolabeled scaffold. (Field width=1.1 cm); [0039]
  • FIG. 14 is a light micrograph of a haematoxylin and eosin stained Dex+cultured scaffold section. (Field width=0.8 cm); [0040]
  • FIG. 15 is a light micrograph of a haematoxylin and eosin stained Dex−cultured scaffold section. (Field width=0.6 cm); [0041]
  • FIG. 16A is a scanning electron micrograph of a prior art PLGA 75/25 membranous scaffold created with particles less than 0.35 mm; [0042]
  • FIG. 16B is a scanning electron micrograph of a prior art PLGA 75/25 membranous scaffold created with particles ranging in size from 0.54 to 0.8 mm. [0043]
  • FIG. 16C is a scanning electron micrograph of a prior art PLGA 75/25 membranous scaffold created with particles ranging in size from 0.8 to 2.0 mm; [0044]
  • FIG. 16D is a scanning electron micrograph of PLGA 75/25 Intermediate scaffold created with particles less than 0.35 mm; [0045]
  • FIG. 16E is a scanning electron micrograph of PLGA 75/25 Intermediate scaffold created with particles ranging in size from 0.54 to 0.8 mm; [0046]
  • FIG. 16F is a scanning electron micrograph of PLGA 75/25 Intermediate scaffold created with particles ranging in size from 0.8 to 2.0 mm; [0047]
  • FIG. 16G is a scanning electron micrograph of PLGA 75/25 Bone-like scaffold created with particles less than 0.35 mm; [0048]
  • FIG. 16H is a scanning electron micrograph of PLGA 75/25 Bone-like scaffold created with particles ranging in size from 0.54 to 0.8 mm; and [0049]
  • FIG. 16I is a scanning electron micrograph of PLGA 75/25 Bone-like scaffold created with particles ranging in size from 0.8 to 2.0 mm. [0050]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic representation of a portion of a polymer scaffold showing two macropores defined by interrupted walls and struts discussed more fully below, the macropores being interconnected with each other by a macroporous interconnection. The two macropores are also connected to the surrounding macropores by microporous passageways (also referred to as micropores). These and several other terms used in the description of the polymer scaffold produced according to the present invention are defined herebelow. Scaffold: device designed as a cell carrier for tissue engineering or related applications. This device has preferably a porous morphology to be colonized by cells. In the present invention the scaffold has an open-pore morphology. Macropores: voids within the polymer scaffold, delinated by interrupted walls and struts. The macropores typically have a diameter between 0.5 and 3.5 mm. Pore walls: predominately formed from polymer struts that delineate the macropores but parts of the pore walls may be considered to be interrupted walls, i.e. small flat or planar plates. This is consistent with the definition of trabeculae by Martin R B (in [0051] CRC Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 10(3), 179-222, 1984), who described the trabeculae of bone as “a complex system of interrupted walls and struts”. Webster's New World Dictionary defines trabecula as “a) a small rod, bar or bundle of fibers b) small septum of fibers forming, with others of its kind, an essential part of the framework of an organ or part”.
  • When the polymer struts form anisotropic bundles, in which microporous interconnections separate struts from each other in the same bundle, the structure of the pore wall is defined as “lamellar”. The struts may also exhibit isotropic morphologies in which the struts are widely separated from each other by mostly macroporous interconnections. Both lamellar and strut-like pore wall structures exhibit nanopores when sectioned. [0052]
  • Micropororous interconnections (also called micropores or microporous passageways): Voids found in lamellar pore walls. Each strut or lamellae of polymer is separated from each other by elongated, parallel pore structures called micropores. The size of these pores is less than 200 μm. Micropores contribute to the overall interconnectivity of the scaffolds. [0053]
  • Macroporous interconnections (also called macroporous passageways): these are passageways between lamellar arrays of pore walls, or between polymer struts. They contribute mostly to the interconnectivity of the macropores, and range in size between 200 μm and 2 mm. [0054]
  • Nanopores: Voids found in the bulk of the polymer. Cross-sections of bulk polymer material, either from pore wall struts or pore wall lamellar structures, exhibit rounded concavities that may, or may not, perforate the entire polymer bulk material. These nanopores may result from trapped non-solvent within the bulk of the polymer, or from autocatalytic degradation of the bulk of the polymer. Nanopores are distributed in the walls of the scaffold. They only contribute to the overall interconnectivity of the macropores when they go through the entire bulk material. [0055]
  • Interconnections: the flow passageways connecting the macropores with each other. The interconnections comprise the macroporous interconnections (passageways), the microporous interconnections (passageways), and the nanopores that perforate the entire bulk material defined above. [0056]
  • The present invention provides a macroporous polymer scaffold comprising macropores and interconnections. Macropores have a diameter in the range of 0.5-3.5 mm, and interconnections as seen in trabecular bone. The morphology of the polymer scaffolds (also referred to as foam structures) disclosed herein is based on that of trabecular bone. [0057]
  • Trabecular bone has been shown to be metabolically the most active site in bone (as described by Rodan G A, in [0058] Bone 13, S3-S6 1992). The specific open pore geometry of trabecular bone favorably affects bone formation and resorption, and is therefore of considerable interest in the context of bone tissue engineering: indeed, the design of an ideal scaffold for bone tissue engineering should also allow fast bone formation and resorption. The morphology of bone trabeculae has therefore served as a model to create the new polymer scaffold structures disclosed herein.
  • The architecture of the trabeculae of bone depends on the anatomic site where the bone is found and, to a lesser extent, on the age of the patient. [0059]
  • As mentioned above, Martin R B (in [0060] CRC Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 10(3), 179-222, 1984) defines the trabeculae of bone as “a complex system of interrupted walls and struts” wherein the voids found between the trabeculae are called “marrow spaces”. The directions of the trabeculae are irregular; however, a global organization of the trabecular geometry is sometimes visible and follows the forces acting on the bone. Areas where trabeculae follow a given direction are anisotropic whereas areas where trabeculae are disposed randomly are isotropic (cf. FIG. 2).
  • Whitehouse and Dyson (supra) as well as Martin (supra) described the porosity of the trabeculae bone in the femora in great detail. Table 1.1 indicates different porosities and trabecular width determined by Whitehouse and Dyson for all areas of the femora. [0061]
    TABLE 1.1
    Femoral trabecular bone porosity and trabeculae width.
    Porosity
    Area (% void/bone) Trabeculae width (mm)
    Medial 71.5 ± 5.0 0.23 ± 0.060
    Lateral 79.0 ± 5.0 0.23 ± 0.053
    Intertrochanteric arches 88.2 ± 3.2 0.14 ± 0.029
    Interior of 84.5 ± 1.8 0.18 ± 0.024
    Intertrochantric arches
    Greater Trochanter 90.5 ± 1.0 0.31 ± 0.026
  • The structure of trabecular bone has been investigated for trabecular width, porosity, anisotropy, and general patterns like connectivity and star volume. Light and scanning electron micrographs published on trabecular bone indicate that the marrow spaces delineated by trabeculae (i.e. pores) range from one to several millimeters in size and are interconnected with holes ranging from approx. 0.3 to one millimeter. [0062]
  • When the use of the trabeculae produced of polymer forming the present invention is for physiological applications, the polymer scaffold is preferably prepared from any biocompatible polymer. The term “biocompatible” as it is used herein is meant to encompass polymers which are not toxic to cells and which allow cells to colonize thereon. Examples of suitable polymers include poly(lactide), poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) of varying ratios, polystyrene, poly(glycolide), poly(acrylate)s, poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate), poly(vinyl alcohol), poly(carbonate), poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate), poly(anhydride), poly(ethylene), poly(propylene), poly(hydroxybutyrate), poly(hydroxyvalerate), poly(urethane)s, poly(ether urethane), poly(ester urethane), poly(arylate), poly(imide), poly(anhydride-co-imide), poly(aminoacids) and poly(phosphazene). Biodegradable, aliphatic polyesters such as polylactic acid, and polymers derived therefrom, represent a particularly useful class of polymers in applications of the present scaffolds, which relate to cell transplantation due to the fact that they have already been approved for human clinical use. In this regard, a preferred polymer for use as scaffold is PLGA, particularly blends comprising more than 50% poly(DL-lactide) such as PLGA 85:15 and PLGA 75:25. [0063]
  • Suitable applications for the present scaffolds will vary with polymer composition and structure. For example, biodegradable polymer scaffolds are suitable for use in either, in vitro applications and/or in vivo cell transplantation. The matrices may serve then as supports or scaffolds to allow cell growth to occur in vitro prior to implantation in vivo. The scaffolds may also be used directly in vivo, without being pre-seeded with cells. In both applications (with or without prior cell seeding), biodegradable polymer matrices in accordance with the present invention are particularly useful for the growth of three-dimensional tissue and may be used in the growth of connective tissues, like bone, cartilage, paradontal tissue, as well as dental tissues and other organs, such as liver or breast tissue. [0064]
  • A significant characteristic of the present polymer scaffold is the presence of macropores at least 50% of which have a diameter within the range of 0.5 to 3.5 mm, a range representative of that found in the human trabecular bone. Preferably, the macropores have a diameter of at least 1.0 mm, and most preferably, the macropores have a diameter between about 1.0 mm and 3.5 mm. [0065]
  • In addition to its macroporous structure, the scaffold is also characterized by a high level of interconnectivity which enhances both penetration of the scaffold by cells and nutrient flow to cells. Macroporous interconnections of at least 0.35 mm provide an “open cell” environment in the polymer scaffold, which is important to encourage tissue growth throughout the scaffold, i.e. three-dimensional tissue growth. [0066]
  • The macropores are delineated by porous polymer walls that may or may not exhibit a lamellar structure. Total thickness of the pore walls is no greater than about 0.4 mm, and preferably no greater than about 0.3 mm. The degree of interconnectivity in the pore walls is dependent, upon other factors, of the processing temperatures. [0067]
  • A suprising and unexpected result is that each macropore is in flow communication with a significant number of neighboring macropores via both macro- and microporous interconnections. [0068]
  • Scaffolds with different pore wall structures obtained at different processing temperatures using this novel phase inversion particulate leaching process are described in the present document. [0069]
  • The porosity of the polymer scaffold is at least at a level of 50% for all scaffolds obtained, as estimated using Northern Eclipse image analysis software and preferably at a level of greater than 50%. The level of porosity of the present polymer scaffold also contributes to the “open cell” nature thereof, resulting in significant overlap between macropores (giving rise to the macroporous passageways) which defines the highly interconnected nature of the present scaffold and further enhances its utility as a scaffold for cell growth. In this regard, the level of porosity is preferably greater than about 75%, while the most preferred level of porosity is greater than about 85%. [0070]
  • The features of the present scaffold make it particularly suitable for use in tissue engineering and more notably, cell transplantation, because it provides a biocompatible scaffold that cells can colonize in a three-dimensional manner via the interconnected macroporous network of the scaffold. This is significant when considering the transplantation of any cells that yield tissues, especially those requiring neoangiogenesis such as bone tissue. Moreover, when used for cell transplantation, the scaffold is biodegradable, the degradation of which can be controlled such that cell growth may be simultaneous with the degradation of the scaffold. [0071]
  • It will be understood by those of skill in the art that the present polymer scaffold may be modified in order to enhance further its properties for use as a scaffold for cellular growth. Modifications typically effecting the structures used as support for cellular growth would also be suitable to modify the present polymer scaffold. Such modifications function to enhance biological response and include, for example, surface modifications with collagen, calcium phosphate, proteoglycans, proteins, peptides, carbohydrates and polysaccharides, or by acid/base treatment. Additionally, the polymer scaffold may serve as a reservoir for the delivery of active molecules, such as proteins, growth factors, etc. that enhance cellular function. [0072]
  • The present polymer scaffold can be made using a novel process which combines particulate leaching methodology with phase inversion methodology. In an initial step, the selected polymer scaffold is prepared as a liquid polymer. As used herein, the term a liquid polymer is meant to refer to polymer in liquid form, either alone or admixed with another liquid. This may be done by mixing the polymer in a solvent to form a polymer solution. Any solvent generally useful to prepare a polymer solution can be used for this purpose, including dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), methylene chloride, ethyl acetate, chloroform, acetone, benzene, 2-butanone, carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, n-heptane, -hexane and n-pentane. As one of skill in the art will appreciate, non-cytotoxic solvents such as DMSO are preferably used to prepare the solution so as not to adversely affect cellular growth. The concentration of the polymer in the polymer solution will vary with the characteristics of the polymer used to make the scaffold. Alternatively, the polymer can be formed into a liquid polymer by heating to its melting point. [0073]
  • The liquid polymer is then admixed with particles of an appropriate size in connection with the particulate leaching phase of the process. Particles having a diameter corresponding to the desired diameter of the macropores in the polymer scaffold are suitable, specifically particles having a diameter in the range of 0.5-3.5 mm. More preferably, the particles have a diameter of greater than 1.0 mm and most preferably, the particles have a diameter of between 1.0 and 2.0 mm. Examples of suitable particles for admixture with the polymer include polysaccharides (such as glucose), organic and inorganic salts, proteins and lipids of an appropriate size which can be dissolved in a solvent other than a solvent for the polymer (i.e. a polymer non-solvent). The amount of particles admixed with the polymer solution will again vary with the characteristics of the polymer used to make the present scaffold. [0074]
  • Once the particles have been thoroughly mixed with the liquid polymer to form a particulate polymer mixture, the polymer is subjected to a phase inversion (precipitation) step in which it is converted from a liquid to a solid. This step is achieved by submerging the particulate polymer mixture in a polymer non-solvent, in other words a solvent in which the polymer is insoluble and in which the polymer precipitates. Such polymer non-solvent include, for example, water, alcohol, 1-4 dioxane and aniline. [0075]
  • The step of precipitating the polymer-particulate mixture results in the formation of elongated struts that form the interrupted pore walls defining the macroscopic pores and the macroscopic passageways connecting the macroscopic pores. The particles act as spacers separating the polymer struts. Therefore, the precipitated polymer does not form a coating that intimately envelops the particles, as is the case in previous methods, but results in an macroporous scaffold characterized by macropores interconnected by macroporous passageways. [0076]
  • In order to obtain a solid polymer scaffold in a particular shape, the polymer mixture can be placed in a mold during the phase inversion step. Preferably, the liquid polymer can be stabilized around the particulates by, for example, freezing the polymer-particulate slurry. Thereby, no mold is used and the phase inversion process occurs simultaneously from all outer surfaces. When the polymer solvent is DMSO, for example, the polymer mixture is cooled to a temperature less than or equal to 12° C., which is the freezing temperature of DMSO. Cooler temperatures, such as temperatures of less than 0° C. can also be used. A consequence of using low temperatures (for example, −20° C. or −80° C.) during this stage of the process is the subsequent formation of a polymer scaffold with a different morphology (cf Example 4), like a thicker skin structure, which may be removed prior to use as a scaffold for three-dimensional cell growth, as described in Example 1. In addition to cooling, other methods of stabilizing the polymer-particulate mixture may be used, for example gellation (increasing viscosity). [0077]
  • Following conversion of the polymer mixture from liquid to solid phase, the polymer is subjected to particulate leaching. In this step of the process, the polymer is immersed in a particulate solvent, i.e. a solvent which functions to dissolve the particles dispersed throughout the polymer but does not dissolve the polymer itself. Appropriate particulate solvents will, of course, depend on the nature of the particles and the polymer. Examples of appropriate particulate solvents include water, alcohol, 1-4 dioxane and aniline. The temperature of the particulate solvent can be varied with minimal effect on the resulting polymer scaffold. However, the temperature will generally be between the freezing point of the particulate solvent and the glass transition temperature of the polymer, so that the polymer scaffold does not melt or become viscous under the effect of the non-solvent temperature. In one example, a particulate solvent temperature of between about 0° C. and 45° C. is applied when the particulate solvent is water and the polymer is PLGA 75:25. [0078]
  • The polymer is submerged in the particulate solvent for an amount of time appropriate to allow complete dissolution of the particles dispersed throughout the polymer scaffold. Generally, a period of at least 24 hours is required to obtain complete particulate dissolution in the polymer scaffold, while a period of at least 48 hours is preferred. In order to expedite efficient dissolution of the particles, it is desirable to immerse the polymer in fresh solvent at frequent intervals during the dissolution period, for example at approximately 8-9 hour intervals or by the use of a circulating solvent bath. [0079]
  • The phase-inversion and particulate-leaching processes may occur in one step with a solvent that is simultaneously a polymer non-solvent and a particulate solvent. In one example, double distilled water (ddH[0080] 2O) was used as the solvent.
  • The polymer scaffold is removed from the particulate solvent following an appropriate particulate dissolution period and can be either vacuum-dried prior to use or disinfected in alcohol (such as 70% ethanol), rinsed and conditioned in culture medium for subsequent use. The scaffold may also subsequently be sterilized for in vivo use, comprising the placing the scaffold in the chamber of a radio frequency glow discharge plasma instrument by applying preferably an argon gas (or other inert gas) radio-frequency glow discharge. A non-limiting process used a power of 100 W with the plasma sustained for 4 minutes. Another sterilization method that may be used is a low temperature ethylene oxide (ETO) sterilization procedure which will be known to those skilled in the art. Another sterilization process that may be used is a gamma-sterilization procedure which will also yield sterile scaffolds. [0081]
  • If the polymer scaffold is not required for immediate use, it is desirably stored dry in a desiccator to prevent moisture retention and possible degradation of the polymer. [0082]
  • The present process advantageously yields a polymer scaffold having unique characteristics, and in particular, yields a polymer scaffold having an interconnected macroporous network. Another significant advantage of the present two-stage process is that it provides amplified means for controlling the morphology of the resulting polymer scaffold. In other words, the process provides two levels, particulate leaching and phase inversion, at which to effect the morphology of the polymer scaffold. For example, macropore size and distribution can be altered during both, the particulate leaching and phase inversion stage of the process and are governed by particulate size and distribution, and, to a lesser extend by the scaffold processing temperatures. In addition, interconnection formation and size can be influenced by varying the rate of the phase inversion. The rate of the phase inversion can be altered altering a number of variables including temperature, type of polymer non-solvent and polymer concentration. Thus the final scaffold morphology can be controlled. Preferably, the resultant morphology resembles that of human trabecular bone. [0083]
  • In another aspect of the present invention, a method for culturing cells for three-dimensional growth is provided utilizing the polymer scaffold described herein. The novel interconnected macroporous structure of the present polymer scaffold is especially suitable for tissue engineering, and notably bone tissue engineering, an intriguing alternative to currently available bone repair therapies. In this regard, bone marrow-derived cell seeding of the polymer scaffold is performed using conventional methods, which are well known to those of skill in the art (as described in Maniatopoulos et al, in [0084] Cell Tissue Res 254, 317-330, 1988). Cells are seeded onto the polymer scaffold and cultured under suitable growth conditions. The cultures are fed with media appropriate to establish the growth thereof.
  • As set out above, cells of various types can be grown throughout the present polymer scaffold. More precisely, cell types includes hematopoietic or mesenchymal stem cells, and also includes cells yielding cardiovascular, muscular, or any connective tissue. Cells may be of human or other animal origin. However, the polymer scaffold of the present invention is particularly suited for the growth of osteogenic cells, especially cells that elaborate bone matrix. For tissue engineering, the cells may be of any origin. The cells are advantageously of human origin. The present method of growing cells in a three dimensional polymer scaffold according to the invention allows seeded osteogenic cells, for example, to penetrate the polymer scaffold to elaborate bone matrix, during the in vitro stage, with pervasive distribution in the structure of the polymer scaffold and particularly to a depth of at least 2.5 times the depth of the average macropore size. Osteogenic cell penetration and, as a result, bone matrix elaboration can be enhanced by mechanical, ultrasonic, electric field or electronic means. While for many human or animal applications, such as bone or tissue replacement the polymer is biocompatible and non toxic, it may preferably be biodegradable also. However, it will be appreciated that in some of these applications it may be preferred or advantageous to use a biocompatible polymer which is not biodegradable in situations where a permanent scaffold is needed to support other tissue. Further, it will be appreciated that for non biological applications the requirements for biocompatibility and biodegradable need not be invoked, for example in applications where the scaffold is used as a filter or catalyst support these requirements may not be important. [0085]
  • Embodiments of the present invention are described in the following specific examples which are exemplary only and not to be construed as limiting. [0086]
  • EXAMPLE 1 Preparation of a PLGA 75:25 Polymer Scaffold
  • A PLGA 75:25 polymer scaffold in accordance with the present invention was prepared using PLGA 75:25 (obtained from Birmingham Polymer Inc), having an inherent viscosity of 0.87 dL/g. One ml of 0.1 g/ml of PLGA 75:25 in DMSO was mixed with 2 of glucose crystals (particle size ranging from 0.8 mm to 2 mm) in an aluminum mold. The PLGA 75:25-DMSO mixture was cooled to −20° C. This temperature of the PLGA 75:25-DMSO mixture is referred to T[0087] mix. The frozen PLGA 75:25 blocks were then immersed in an ice-water slurry of ddH2O at 0° C., which is a non-solvent for the polymer. This temperature of the water is referred to Tnonsolvent. The blocks remained in ddH2O for 48 hours during which the ddH2O was changed approximately every 8 hours. The obtained scaffolds were then removed from the water, vacuum-dried for 72 h at 0.01 mm Hg and stored at 4° C. in a desiccator under vacuum until use. Scaffolds obtained using the above mentioned conditions were then fully analyzed.
  • The macroporous structure of 2 mm thick polymer scaffold sections was observed at low magnification (16×) using a dissection microscope as shown in FIG. 3A. A uniform distribution of interconnected macropores ranging in size from about 0.8-1.5 mm was observed throughout the polymer scaffold. The macropores exhibited elliptic morphologies and thick porous walls (about 300 μm thick) containing micropores. [0088]
  • The polymer scaffold was then embedded in Tissue-Tek embedding medium (Miles #4583), and sectioned in a cryostat at −20° C. A serial set of 20 μm-thick sections (50 sections) were collected on glass slides (VWR Canlab). Sections were photographed at low magnification (16×) using a dissecting microscope and scanned. FIG. 3B is a scanned scaffold section that identifies the porous components of the scaffold, the macropores, the macroporous interconnections (passageways) and the microporous interconnections (passageways). A polymer thin film (i.e. a skin layer) was observed on the outer surface of the polymer scaffold. The images were converted to TIFF files and analyzed on a PC computer using the Northern Eclipse image analysis software. The “single measurement” menu was used to measure the pore wall sizes (area, perimeter, diameter etc.) for each scanned section. The “data measure” routine computed the area and number of pore wall struts per scanned slide. [0089]
  • These measurements were converted from pixel units to millimeters by calibrating the system, using the above mentioned magnification of the scanned images to determine the pixel/mm ratio. Macropore size was determined by manually drawing a line with a software tool on the digitized image of the polymer scaffold section from one pore wall to the adjacent pore wall. The characteristics of the resulting polymer scaffold as determined using the Northern Eclipse image analysis software were as follows: [0090]
    Macropore Size 1.79+/−0.42 mm
    Macroporous interconnections 0.37+/−0.15 mm
    Pore wall thickness 0.29+/−0.13 mm
    Micropores 0.10+/−0.05 mm
    Porosity 86.7+/−2.43% 
  • The porosity of the polymer matrices was also estimated by mercury porosimetry (Quantachrome Autoscan 60). A solid penetrometer with 5 cm[0091] 3 cell stem volume was used for samples in the range of 0.015 to 0.020 g. The values of void volume were calculated from the mercury intrusion volume. The porosity was calculated from the mercury intrusion volume to be 89.6%. The porosity estimated using the Northern Eclipse image analysis software (˜87%) is substantially equivalent to that of ˜90% as measured by mercury porosimetry given that the mercury porosimetry method is not accurate when analyzing polymer scaffolds with pore diameters greater than ˜75 μm.
  • The polymer scaffold was also prepared for analysis using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The scaffold was cross-sectioned at a thickness of approximately 2 mm and sputter-coated with gold under argon atmosphere (Polaron Instrument Inc., Doylestown, Pa.). Scanning electron micrographs were taken on a Hitachi 2500 SEM at 15 kV acceleration voltage. The diameter of the macropores was confirmed using the SEM micrographs to be about 1 to 1.5 mm, although a clear separation between each macropore was not always observed illustrating the very open interconnected structure of these polymer scaffolds. [0092]
  • The microporous nature of the pore walls, as observed under the optical microscope, was confirmed by SEM, as shown in FIG. 3C. [0093]
  • The polymer scaffold was mechanically tested as follows. A polymer scaffold in the form of a cylinder with a diameter and a height of 1.5 cm was prepared and tested using an Instron Mechanical tester. The mechanical experiments were performed on a uniaxial servohydraulic testing machine (Instron Model 1331 load frame with Series 2150 controller). A 1 kg load cell (Sensotec, Model 31/4680) was used for all compression tests. The deflection of the actuator was measured by a DC linearly variable differential transformer (LVDT, intertechnology Model SE 374). Signals from the load cell and the LVDT were displayed during testing on a digital storage oscilloscope (Gould, Model 1425). The signals were also input into a 16-channel, 12-bit analog-to-digital (A/D) converter in an accelerated Apple IIe computer. The rate of data acquisition for these experiments was 430 pairs of data points per second. Compression of the polymer scaffold occurred at a rate of 0.1 mm/s As shown in FIG. 4A, A plot of compression strength vs. percent deformation of the polymer scaffold showed two moduli. The Young's modulus for the first elastic region (referred to Y[0094] 1) was 0.76±0.12 MPa, and for the second elastic region (referred to Y2) was 0.18±0.016 MPa.
  • EXAMPLE 2 Effect of Polymer Concentration on Polymer Scaffold Structure
  • The effect of PLGA 75:25 concentration in DMSO on the structure of the resulting polymer scaffold was determined using the protocol outlined in detail in Example 1. Three different concentrations of PLGA 75:25 in DMSO (0.05 g/ml, 0.1 g/ml and 0.2 g/ml) were used to make polymer matrices while all other conditions were maintained constant as described in Example 1. [0095]
  • Each of the polymer scaffolds prepared were cut in half using a razor blade. A skin structure was found on each regardless of the starting concentration of PLGA 75:25 in DMSO. The mechanical properties of the 3 different polymer scaffolds were assessed and are illustrated in FIG. 4B. A significant decrease in Young's modulus was observed in the polymer scaffold prepared using the PLGA in DMSO of 0.05 mg/ml while the stiffest scaffold was obtained with a PLGA 75:25 concentration of 2 mg/ml. [0096]
  • These scaffolds were also observed under light microscopy and SEM. No differences in structure could be detected between the three polymer scaffolds under light microscope. However, when observed under the SEM, the scaffolds created with 0.05 g/ml PLGA in DMSO exhibited more of a lamellar wall structure with more microporous interconnections (see FIG. 5), than those created with 0.2 g/ml PLGA in DMSO, where fewer microporous porous interconnections were seen (see FIG. 6). [0097]
  • EXAMPLE 3 Effect of the Particles on Polymer Scaffold Structure
  • The effect on polymer scaffold structure of both varying the amount and size of the glucose particles admixed with the PLGA polymer was determined as follows. Differing amounts of glucose particles (0.5 g, 1 g and 2 g) were separately admixed with 1 ml polymer solution, maintaining all other conditions as described in Example 1 constant. The effect of particle size on the final scaffold morphology was also assessed by using the following sieved particles: (standard testing sieves, VWR, West Chester, Pa.): 1) NaCl crystals (<0.35 mm), 2) sucrose crystals (0.54 mm<crystal size<0.8 mm) and 3) glucose crystals (0.8 mm<crystal size<2 mm). The resulting polymer scaffolds were observed by light microscopy. When mixing the polymer solution with the particulates, it was seen that for small amounts of particulates (i.e. 0.5 g/ml), the polymer solution was not fully immersed in the particulate bed. This layer of polymer solution resulted after phase inversion in a membranous structure, similar to that seen when no particulates are used. Larger solution densities of particulates (i.e. 2.0 g/ml) completely infiltrated the polymer solution so that the resulting scaffold contained a distribution of macropores without this membranous structure. [0098]
  • The size of the macropores was directly proportional to the size of the particles used, e.g. macropore size were ˜0.33 mm when particles<0.35 mm were used (cf. FIG. 7A), and ˜0.75 mm when particles ranging from 0.54 to 0.8 mm were used (cf. FIG. 7B). Finally for particles bigger than 0.8 mm, the observed macropores were ˜1.4 mm (cf FIG. 7C). When no particles were mixed to the polymer-DMSO solution, the resulting polymer structure was a hollow cylinder composed of a thick skin containing micropores, as illustrated in FIG. 8. This skin closely resembled the membrane structure resulting from a normal phase-inversion process. [0099]
  • EXAMPLE 4 Effect Of The Processing Temperatures On Polymer Scaffold Structure
  • The effects of three different T[0100] mix (11° C., −20° C. and −80° C.) at constant Tnonsolvent (0° C.) were studied. Two main different scaffold structures were obtained: 1) with Tmix=11° C. and 2) with Tmix=−20° C. and Tmix=−80° C. Scaffolds obtained with a Tmix=11° C. and a Tnonsolvent=0° C. were skinless and showed a very open structure. As shown in FIG. 9A, The macropores sizes seemed expanded, and were estimated by SEM at to ˜2.72 mm. The pore walls had less micropores but more macroporous interconnections, providing a generally more open structure to the scaffolds. The scaffolds obtained for Tmix=−20° C. and −80° C. both had a skin structure. For Tmix=−20° C. the macropores seemed smaller than on scaffolds obtained at higher Tmix and their sizes were estimated by SEM at ˜1.8 mm. The pore walls were lamellar, with fewer macroporous interconnections but more microporous interconnections (cf FIG. 9B). It was observed that the macropore size decreased with lower Tmix. The differences in macropore sizes were particularly important between scaffolds created at Tmix=11° C. and Tmix=−20° C., whereas minor differences in macropore size were observed between scaffolds created at Tmix=−20° C. and Tmix=−80° C. While the macropore sizes diminished with Tmix the structure of the pore wall also changed as described above. Differences in Tmix may have affected the rate of polymer precipitation, and therefore, the complexity of the pore wall structure.
  • Different T[0101] nonsolvent (40° C., 20° C. and 0° C.) were also studied, with a constant Tmix of −20° C. In this case, the main difference between all scaffolds was their pore wall thickness. Lower Tnonsolvent caused thicker and more complex pore walls whereas higher Tnonsolvent created thin and compact pore walls, comparable to polymer struts delineating each macropore. FIGS. 9B and 9C show the different morphologies of the scaffold structures at Tnonsolvent=0° C. and 40° C. respectively. Most structural differences were seen between scaffolds created at Tnonsolvent=0° C. and Tnonsolvent=20° C. Fewer differences were seen between scaffolds obtained at Tnonsolvent=20° C. or 40° C. While lower Tnonsolvent (0° C.) provided lamellar pore walls (cf FIG. 9B), higher Tnonsolvent (400° C.) provided strut-like pore wall morphologies (cf FIG. 9C).
  • The thickness of the pore walls of scaffolds created at different T[0102] nonsolvent was estimated by SEM. At Tnonsolvent=0° C., the pore walls were estimated at 0.29 mm, whereas at Tnonsolvent=20° C., the size of the pore walls was ˜0.10 mm; and no significant differences could be measured between Tnonsolvent=20° C. and 40° C. All scaffolds created with the various temperatures as mentioned above were sectioned, and pore size and pore wall thickness were measured. Their porosity was also estimated using the Northern Eclipse image analysis software. The following results were obtained:
    Temperature Temperature
    of Polymer of non- Pore size ± Pore wall
    solution solvent std dev. thickness ±
    (_ C.) (_ C.) (mm) std dev. (mm) Porosity (%)
    −80  0 1.71 ± 0.22 0.28 ± 0.16 80.4 ± 1.34
    RT 1.63 ± 0.32 0.24 ± 0.10 83.8 ± 1.79
    40 1.91 ± 0.43 0.16 ± 0.05 84.6 ± 3.65
    −20  0 1.76 ± 0.42 0.29 ± 0.13 86.7 ± 2.43
    RT 2.21 ± 0.43 0.10 ± 0.05 85.7 ± 0.97
    40 1.96 ± 0.41 0.12 ± 0.04 93.1 ± 2.45
     11  0 2.02 ± 0.54 0.11 ± 0.05 93.4 ± 2.07
    RT 2.41 ± 0.54 0.15 ± 0.06 91.7 ± 1.63
    40 2.72 ± 0.41 0.17 ± 0.08 95.6 ± 1.7 
  • EXAMPLE 5 Surface Modification Of Polymer Scaffold
  • The obtained scaffolds as described in Example 1 were further surface modified by acid/base treatment; plasma modification with ammonia gas; modification by ozone treatment; collagen deposition; calcium phosphate deposition and platelet rich plasma deposition. The procedures and results were as follows: [0103]
  • Acid/base treatment was developed to enhance surface charge and to change the surface topography. The scaffolds were maintained in several concentrations of acetic acid (0.1 M, 1 M, 5 M) for 24 h. Scaffolds were also maintained in various concentrations of NaOH for 24 h to observe surface polymer chain hydrolysis. Under SEM, the scaffolds treated with 5 M acetic acid or 0.1 M NaOH for 24 hours showed changes in surface topography with appearance of nanopores. [0104]
  • Plasma modification with ammonia gas was achieved by placing a scaffold in the chamber of a radio frequency glow discharge plasma instrument, evacuating the chamber and purging with ammonia. The ammonia plasma was generated at powers between 33 W and 100 W for up to 10 min. Scaffolds treated this way were found to have more nitrogen and oxygen than unmodified counterparts and were more hydrophilic. These surface properties may enhance cell-material interactions, including cell adhesion and, spreading and tissue formation. [0105]
  • A collagen deposition experiment was designed to enhance cell adhesion on the polymer surfaces. The scaffolds were maintained in 0.1% collagen for 1 h, 5 h, 8 h and 24 h. [0106]
  • A calcium phosphate deposition experiment was tested to enhance cell adhesion on the surface of the scaffolds. These were maintained for 1 week in fully supplemented medium (as described in Example 6) at 37° C. The calcium phosphate crystals on the surface of the scaffolds were visualized by Von Kossa staining. [0107]
  • Further CaP deposition experiments were conducted, in which the scaffolds were dipped in 1.5 mM Na[0108] 2HPO4 for 2 h at room temperature, and further equilibrated in a saturated Ca2+ solution overnight. The scaffolds were then observed under SEM and crystals with leaflet morphologies were observed on the scaffold structure. (cf FIG. 10).
  • A platelet-rich plasma deposition to increase in vivo responsiveness of the scaffolds in various tissues involves soaking the scaffolds in a platelet-rich plasma prior to use. [0109]
  • EXAMPLE 6 Bulk Modification of Polymer Scaffolds
  • The obtained scaffolds as described in Example 1 were further bulk modified by addition of a plasticizer; incorporation of drugs/genes into the polymer; and addition of an inorganic phase into the polymer. The procedures and results were as follows: [0110]
  • The bulk modulus of the polymer scaffold was reduced by addition of a plasticizer, thereby yielding scaffolds for use in soft tissue applications, such as, cardiovascular and/or muscular tissues. Poly ethylene glycol (PEG) with a Mw of 5000 was added to a 1.0 g/ml solution of PLGA 75/25 in DMSO to a final weight ratio of PEG:PLGA of 0.5:1. The PEG-PLGA solution was mixed with particulates, the polymer was precipitated and the particulates and PEG polymer were leached out in H[0111] 2O, as described in Example 1. This process yielded a scaffold with enhanced nanoporosity and hence, lower bulk modulus.
  • Addition of an inorganic phase, for example, Calcium phosphate powders to the bulk of the polymer, was investigated as a mean to enhance the osteogenic and mechanical properties of the scaffold. Dicalcium phosphate anhydrous (DCPA)_and tetracalcium phosphate (TTCP) were mixed in a 1:1 ratio, and added to the polymer DMSO solution to a ratio of particulates:polymer ranging from 1:1 to 5:1. Glucose particulates were added to the slurry and the polymer was precipitated as described above, in H[0112] 2O. Calcium phosphate crystals were trapped in the resulting scaffolds.
  • Addition of proteins and/or DNA into the polymer slurry prior to mixing with the glucose particulates yielded scaffolds with entrapped proteins and/or DNA and/or genes and/or vectors. This is of particular interest for the use of these scaffolds as protein/DNA/gene/vectors delivery systems. [0113]
  • EXAMPLE 7 Bone Marrow-Derived Cell Culture On Polymer Scaffolds
  • PLGA 75:25 polymer scaffolds were prepared as previously described: 2 g/ml glucose crystals were dispersed in a 0.1 g /ml PLGA 75:25 solution in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, BDH, Toronto, ON). The polymer slurry was frozen at 11° C. The polymer was then precipitated and the glucose crystals were extracted from the precipitated polymer in ddH[0114] 2O at 40° C. Scaffolds were dried to constant mass (10 μm Hg, 72 h), disinfected in 70% EtOH for {fraction (1/2 )} h, rinsed 3× with a-MEM and equilibrated in sterile a-MEM at 37° C. for 6 days.
  • First passage primary bone marrow-derived cells were seeded on 0.25 cm[0115] 3 scaffolds using protocols and media described in detail elsewhere (as described by Maniatopoulos et al, supra, and Davies et al., in Cells and Materials, 1:3-15,1991). Briefly, bone marrow-derived cells were collected from both femora of young adult male Wistar rats (approximately 150 g) into a fully supplemented medium (FSM): a-MEM supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum, 50 mg/mL ascorbic acid, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate and antibiotics (0.1 mg/mL penicillin G, 0.05 mg/mL gentamicin and 0.3 mg/mL fungizone); 10−8 M Dexamethasone (Dex) was added to the FSM of only Dex+ cultures.
  • Cells were maintained in culture for 6 days, and re-fed at [0116] days 2 and 5 with FSM. At day 6, Dex− cells were trypsinized with 0.01% trypsin in PBS, whereas Dex+ cultures, in which signs of calcification were visible, were trypsinized with 0.01% trypsin and 10 μM ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) in PBS. Dex+ and Dex− cells were then seeded on separate pre-wetted scaffolds at a concentration of 7.5×105 cells/scaffold. The cultures were maintained for 42 days at 37° C. and 5% CO2 and refed every 2-3 days with FSM. Dex was added to the FSM of Dex+ cell cultures at a concentration of 10−8 M for each refeeding.
  • Tetracycline.HCl powder (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) was dissolved in a-MEM to prepare a stock solution of 90 mg/mL. A new tetracycline-containing fully supplemented medium (TFSM) was prepared of a-MEM containing 15% fetal bovine serum, 50 mg/mL ascorbic acid, 10 mM a-glycerophosphate and 9 mg/ml of tetracycline. The TFSM was used for the last refeeding on [0117] day 40. At day 42, cultures were washed in a-MEM (10 times, ˜3 min each), and fixed in Karnovsky's fixative (2.0% paraformaldehyde, 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH7.2-7.4) overnight. A few cultures were kept for SEM observations and were dehydrated in a series of graded alcohol solutions (70%, 100%), and freeze-dried at 0.01 mm Hg for 2 days. All other cultures were kept in 0.1 M Cacodylate buffer for histological or confocal observations.
  • Confocal observations were carried out as follows: samples were placed in custom-made chambers in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (obtained from BDH). The chambers were sealed with a glass coverslip. Fluorescent signals were detected by optical sectioning in a Bio-Rad MRC-600 confocal laser microscope, using the BHS filter. Scaffold seeded with Dex(+) cells showed a fluorescent label up to a depth of approx. 1 mm as seen in FIG. 11. Fluorescence could not be observed deeper within the scaffolds because the depth of field of the confocal microscope was not sufficient. Scaffolds were therefore sectioned at a thickness of approximately 2 mm and analyzed by confocal microscopy from both sides. Fluorescence was observed throughout the entire scaffold. The fluorescent label was also seen using sections of cell-seeded scaffolds seeded with Dex(+) cells (see FIG. 12). Cross sections of polymer scaffold seeded with Dex(−) and Dex(+) cells were observed under UV light. A bright fluorescent signal was only seen on the Dex(+) sections throughout the whole scaffold. Specifically, the elaborated bone matrix, as observed by the fluorescent signal, was visualized throughout the depth of a 0.5 cm polymer scaffold which was employed in culture. The limiting factor in this assay was the depth of the polymer scaffold; and thus increasing the depth of the polymer scaffold would increase the depth to which cells penetration, and thus bone matrix formation, could be achieved in this polymer scaffold. [0118]
  • Scaffolds were also immunolabeled for osteocalcin. Osteocalcin expression in both Dex+ and Dex− cultures were assessed by immunohistochemical methods using a goat anti-rat osteocalcin antiserum (Biomedical Technologies Inc., Stoughton Mass.) at a final dilution of 1:6000. The assay was terminated by second anti-body labeling with donkey anti-goat IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase antiserum, at a concentration of 1:250. A 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) substrate kit for peroxidase (Vector laboratories, Burlingame Calif.) was used supplemented with nickel chloride to develop the staining. FIG. 13 shows an osteocalcin-labeled scaffold seeded with Dex+ cells and maintained in culture for 6 weeks. Histological sections of the scaffolds were obtained as following: samples were embedded in Tissue Tek and sectioned vertically at a 6 mm thickness. Cell growth within the scaffolds was also observed from the histological sections. At low magnification, the entire scaffold section could be visualized by LM. In both Dex+ and Dex− cultures, cell coverage was found throughout the entire scaffold structure. Haematoxylin and eosin staining was visible along all the macropores, on the outer surfaces as well as in the middle of the scaffolds. FIGS. 14 and 15 show low magnification of Dex+ and Dex− cultured foams The amount of matrix elaborated on Dex− cultures was far more abundant than on Dex+ cultures, as seen at higher magnification. In Dex+ cultures, only a few cell layers were found lining the pore walls and producing matrix in close apposition to the pore walls, whereas in Dex− cultures, the entire macropore volumes were filled with matrix. [0119]
  • EXAMPLE 8 Seeding Human Marrow Cells On Polymer Scaffold
  • PLGA 75:25 matrices were prepared as described in Example 1. These scaffolds were disinfected in 70% ethanol for 30 min prior to being seeded with human bone marrow stromal cells, from young donors, using protocols and dexamethasone (dex) containing media described in detail by Parker et al. (J. of Bone Min. Res., 12(1), S300:F298, 1997). [0120]
  • EXAMPLE 9 Effect Of Macropore Size And Interconnectivity On Cell Invasion
  • Three different scaffold morphologies were created: 1) scaffolds obtained by particulate leaching only, referred to as membranous scaffolds forming part of the prior art and shown in FIGS. 16A, 16B and [0121] 16C discussed briefly below, 2) scaffolds obtained by particulate leaching phase inversion using low processing temperatures, as described in Example 1, referred to Intermediate scaffolds and 3) scaffolds obtained by particulate leaching phase inversion using higher processing temperatures, as described in Example 4, referred to as bone-like scaffolds. From each of these three basic processing routes, the three scaffold structures were created with different macropore sizes, so that a total of nine different scaffold structures were obtained. These nine structures are illustrated in FIGS. 16A to 16I.
  • Membranous scaffolds were created using a particulate leaching technique only (as described by Mikos et al, in [0122] Biomaterials 14, 323-330, 1993), see the prior art shown in FIGS. 16A, 16B and 16C. Briefly, a PLGA 75/25 (Birmingham Polymers) solution in chloroform was cast over sieved particles, either 1) NaCl (size<0.35 mm), 2) sucrose crystals (size ranging from 0.54 to 0.8 mm) or 3) glucose crystals (size ranging from 0.8 to 2 mm). The polymer structures were left at room temperature to allow chloroform evaporation, after which the particles were dissolved in ddH2O.
  • Intermediate and bone-like scaffolds were produced as described in Examples 1 and 4 by extracting the same different particles as described above from the precipitated polymer. Intermediate scaffolds were created at a polymer solution temperature of −20° C. and a non-solvent at room temperature whereas Bone-like scaffolds were produced with a polymer solution temperature at 11° C. and a non-solvent at room temperature. The obtained scaffolds were disinfected in 70% ethanol for 30 min prior to being seeded with cells. [0123]
  • Cell colonization of the scaffolds was confirmed by confocal microscopy, and cell differentiation throughout the scaffold structure was confirmed using the osteocalcin labeling assay described in Example 6. The following results is Table 2 were observed: [0124]
    TABLE 2
    Scaffold Sizes And Cell Colonization Patterns
    Particle size
    Scaffold/particle <0.35 mm 0.54 to 0.8 mm 0.8 to 2.0 mm
    Membranous
    Macropore size 0.33 0.58 1.1
    Intercon. Size 0.01 0.09 0.9
    Cell depth 0.3 0.5 1.5
    Osteocalcin Surface Surface Surface
    Intermediate
    Macropore size 0.33 0.75 1.4
    Intercon. Size 0.07 0.15 0.45
    Cell depth 0.3 1.5 Throughout
    Osteocalcin Surface Surface Surface
    Bone-Like
    Macropore size 0.35 0.7 1.8
    Intercon. Size 0.2 0.35 0.65
    Cell depth 1.2 Throughout Throughout
    Osteocalcin Throughout Throughout Throughout
  • Cell colonization of the scaffolds, as reported in Table 2, required a minimum interconnection size of 0.35 mm and macropore size of 0.7 mm. [0125]
  • In this Example, membranous scaffolds with macropore size of 1.1 mm were not colonized by cells whereas Bone-like scaffolds with macropore sizes of 0.7 mm were fully colonized by cells. In conclusion, this Example demonstrates that scaffolds obtained by particulate leaching phase inversion technique allowed cell colonization throughout the entire scaffold morphology, whereas previously published scaffold were only colonized by cells within their superficial pore layer. [0126]
  • The foregoing description of the preferred embodiments of the invention has been presented to illustrate the principles of the invention and not to limit the invention to the particular embodiment illustrated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by all of the embodiments encompassed within the following claims and their equivalents. [0127]

Claims (39)

We claim:
1. A macroporous polymer scaffold with a trabecular morphology having a porosity of at least 50%, including interrupted pore walls and polymer struts defining macropores which have a mean diameter in a range from about 0.5 to about 3.5 mm and are interconnected by macroporous passageways.
2. A polymer scaffold, as defined in claim 1 wherein the macroporous passageways have a mean diameter in a range from about 200 μm to about 2mm.
3. A polymer scaffold, as defined in claim 2 including microporous passageways having a mean diameter greater than 50 μm and less than 200 μm interconnecting macropores.
4. A polymer scaffold as defined in claim 1, wherein said polymer struts separating macropores having a thickness of less than 0.4 mm.
5. A polymer scaffold as defined in claim 3, which is biocompatible.
6. A polymer scaffold as defined in claim 5, which is biodegradable.
7. A polymer scaffold as defined in claim 5, comprising a polymer derived from poly(lactide-co-glycolide).
8. A polymer scaffold as defined in claim 7, comprising the polymer poly(lactide-co-glycolide) in a ratio of 75% polylactide and 25% polyglycolide.
9. A polymer scaffold as defined in claim 6, having a porosity of at least 85%.
10. A polymer scaffold as defined in claim 3 wherein said polymer struts separating macropores having a thickness of less than 0.4 mm, and wherein said polymer is biocompatible and biodegradable, and has a porosity of at least 85%.
11. A process for synthesizing a polymer scaffold comprising the steps of:
mixing liquid polymer with particles to form a particulate-polymer mixture;
submerging the particulate-polymer mixture in a polymer non-solvent to precipitate said polymer producing a solidified particulate-polymer mixture; and
submerging the solidified particulate-polymer mixture into a particulate solvent for a time sufficient to dissolve the particles.
12. A process as defined in claim 11 including stabilizing said particulate-polymer mixture prior to precipitating said polymer.
13. A process as defined in claim 12 wherein said particulate-polymer mixture is stabilized by cooling it to a suitable temperature.
14. A process as defined in claim 13 wherein said liquid polymer is formed by dissolving a polymer in a polymer solvent.
15. A process as defined in claim 14 wherein said polymer solvent is DMSO.
16. A process as defined in claim 14 wherein particles have a diameter in the range of about 0.5 to about 3.5 mm.
17. A process as defined in claim 16 wherein said particles have a mean diameter in the range of about 1.0 to about 2.0 mm.
18. A process as defined in claim 11 wherein said liquid polymer is formed by heating a polymer to its melting point to liquefy said polymer.
19. A process as defined in claim 11, wherein said particles are selected from the group consisting of polysaccharides, organic salts, inorganic salts, proteins and lipids.
20. A process as defined in claim 19 wherein said particles are selected from the group consisting of sugar or salt particles or both.
21. A process as defined in claim 11 wherein said polymer non-solvent is water.
22. A process as defined in claim 11, wherein the surface of the polymer scaffold is modified using a treatment selected from the group consisting of acid treatment, base treatment, plasma modification with ammonia, collagen deposition, calcium phosphate deposition and platelet-rich plasma deposition or exposure.
23. A process as defined in claim 11 wherein the polymer is biocompatible.
24. A process as defined in claim 23, wherein the polymer is biodegradable.
25. A process as defined in claim 24 including sterilizing the biodegradable scaffold for in vivo use that comprises exposing the biodegradable scaffold to a radio frequency glow discharge plasma in a presence of an inert gas.
26. A process as defined in claim 24 including sterilizing the biodegradable scaffold for in vivo use that comprises ethylene oxide sterilization.
27. A process as defined in claim 24 including sterilizing the biodegradable scaffold for in vivo use that comprises exposure of the biodegradable scaffold to gamma-irradiation.
28. A process for growing tissue, with pervasive distribution, in a macroporous polymer scaffold including macropores to a depth of at least 2.5 times an average macropore size in the scaffold, comprising the steps of:
synthesizing a macroporous polymer scaffold with a trabecular morphology having a porosity of at least 50%, including interrupted pore walls and polymer struts defining macropores which have a mean diameter in a range from about 0.5 to about 3.5 mm and are interconnected by macroporous passageways having a size in a range from about 200 μm to about 2 mm;
seeding the polymer scaffold with tissue cells; and
culturing said tissue cells.
29. A process for growing tissue as defined in claim 28 wherein said macroporous polymer scaffold includes microporous passageways having a size greater than 50 μm and less than 200 μm interconnecting macropores.
30. A process for growing tissue as defined in claim 29 wherein said macroporous polymer scaffold has a porosity of at least 85%.
31. A process for growing tissue as defined in claim 28, additionally comprising the step of modifying the surface of the polymer scaffold.
32. A process as defined in claim 31 wherein the surface of the polymer scaffold is modified using a treatment selected from the group consisting of acid treatment, base treatment, ammonia plasma modification, collagen deposition and calcium phosphate deposition, platelet-rich plasma deposition/exposure.
33. A process as defined in claim 28 wherein said tissue cells are osteogenic cells.
34. A process as defined in claim 33 wherein said tissue cells elaborate bone matrix.
35. A process as defined in claim 34 wherein said tissue cells are of human origin.
36. A process as defined in claim 35 wherein said tissue cells are selected from the group consisting of paradontal tissue cells, cartilage tissue cells, dental tissue cells, liver tissue cells and breast tissue cells.
37. A process as defined in claim 28 wherein cells are of mesenchymal or hematopoietic origin.
38. A method as defined in claim 28 wherein said cells are maintained for In vitro and in vivo applications.
39. A process as defined in claim 11 wherein said particles are selected from the group consisting of organic and inorganic particles.
US10/216,877 1997-11-14 2002-08-13 Process for growing tissue in a biocompatible macroporous polymer scaffold and products therefrom Expired - Fee Related US6875442B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/216,877 US6875442B2 (en) 1997-11-14 2002-08-13 Process for growing tissue in a biocompatible macroporous polymer scaffold and products therefrom

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA2,221,195 1997-11-14
CA002221195A CA2221195A1 (en) 1997-11-14 1997-11-14 Biodegradable polymer matrix
US09/191,107 US6379962B1 (en) 1997-11-14 1998-11-13 Polymer scaffold having microporous polymer struts defining interconnected macropores
US09/578,718 US6472210B1 (en) 1997-11-14 2000-05-26 Polymer scaffold having microporous polymer struts defining interconnected macropores
US10/216,877 US6875442B2 (en) 1997-11-14 2002-08-13 Process for growing tissue in a biocompatible macroporous polymer scaffold and products therefrom

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/578,718 Division US6472210B1 (en) 1997-11-14 2000-05-26 Polymer scaffold having microporous polymer struts defining interconnected macropores

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20030008395A1 true US20030008395A1 (en) 2003-01-09
US6875442B2 US6875442B2 (en) 2005-04-05

Family

ID=46276819

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/578,718 Expired - Lifetime US6472210B1 (en) 1997-11-14 2000-05-26 Polymer scaffold having microporous polymer struts defining interconnected macropores
US10/216,877 Expired - Fee Related US6875442B2 (en) 1997-11-14 2002-08-13 Process for growing tissue in a biocompatible macroporous polymer scaffold and products therefrom

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/578,718 Expired - Lifetime US6472210B1 (en) 1997-11-14 2000-05-26 Polymer scaffold having microporous polymer struts defining interconnected macropores

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US6472210B1 (en)

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050071003A1 (en) * 1999-03-17 2005-03-31 Ku David N. Poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel
US20050273178A1 (en) * 2004-02-06 2005-12-08 Boyan Barbara D Load bearing biocompatible device
US20050278025A1 (en) * 2004-06-10 2005-12-15 Salumedica Llc Meniscus prosthesis
US20070248933A1 (en) * 2003-10-10 2007-10-25 Dentigenix Inc. Methods for treating dental conditions using tissue scaffolds
US20080279943A1 (en) * 2004-02-06 2008-11-13 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Method of making hydrogel implants
US20090061517A1 (en) * 2007-05-31 2009-03-05 Kisaalita William S Cell culture apparatus and methods of making and using same
US20110023430A1 (en) * 2007-08-31 2011-02-03 Amit Kumar Multiple Layer Substrate Support and Exhaust Gas Treatment Device
WO2014081940A1 (en) * 2012-11-21 2014-05-30 Trustees Of Boston University Tissue markers and uses thereof
US20140236299A1 (en) * 2007-02-28 2014-08-21 Ryan K. Roeder Porous composite biomaterials and related methods
WO2015017626A1 (en) * 2013-08-02 2015-02-05 University Of South Florida (A Florida Non-Profit Corporation) Three dimensional fibrous scaffolds for cell culture
US9155543B2 (en) 2011-05-26 2015-10-13 Cartiva, Inc. Tapered joint implant and related tools
US9907663B2 (en) 2015-03-31 2018-03-06 Cartiva, Inc. Hydrogel implants with porous materials and methods
US20180305014A1 (en) * 2014-02-28 2018-10-25 Lucas J. Myslinski Drone device for real estate
US10350072B2 (en) 2012-05-24 2019-07-16 Cartiva, Inc. Tooling for creating tapered opening in tissue and related methods
US10758374B2 (en) 2015-03-31 2020-09-01 Cartiva, Inc. Carpometacarpal (CMC) implants and methods

Families Citing this family (57)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR876M (en) 1960-10-12 1961-10-16
US7022522B2 (en) * 1998-11-13 2006-04-04 Limin Guan Macroporous polymer scaffold containing calcium phosphate particles
US6964685B2 (en) * 1999-06-22 2005-11-15 The Brigham And Women's Hospital, Inc. Biologic replacement for fibrin clot
JP2002306155A (en) * 2001-03-27 2002-10-22 Becton Dickinson & Co Method for cell culture and apparatus therefor
WO2003104439A2 (en) * 2002-03-12 2003-12-18 Surface Logix, Inc. Assay device that analyzes the absorption, metabolism, permeability and/or toxicity of a candidate compound
AU2003275326A1 (en) * 2002-09-30 2004-04-23 Massachussetts Eye And Ear Infirmary In vitro culture of tissue structures
CN100503693C (en) * 2003-01-16 2009-06-24 同济大学 3-D porous frame material of poly-lactic acid-polyether block copolymer and its preparation method
EP1594908B1 (en) * 2003-02-19 2012-08-01 Orteq B.V. Method for the preparation of new segmented polyurethanes with high tear and tensile strengths and method for making porous scaffolds
US20060076295A1 (en) 2004-03-15 2006-04-13 The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Systems and methods of blood-based therapies having a microfluidic membraneless exchange device
ATE510605T1 (en) 2003-03-14 2011-06-15 Univ Columbia SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BLOOD BASED THERAPY USING A MEMBRANELESS MICROFLUID EXCHANGE DEVICE
US7794408B2 (en) * 2003-03-28 2010-09-14 Ethicon, Inc. Tissue collection device and methods
GB0311221D0 (en) * 2003-05-15 2003-06-18 Orthogem Ltd Biomaterial
US20050084962A1 (en) * 2003-08-20 2005-04-21 Bruce Simon Methods of treatment using electromagnetic field stimulated stem cells
US7744869B2 (en) * 2003-08-20 2010-06-29 Ebi, Llc Methods of treatment using electromagnetic field stimulated mesenchymal stem cells
US8034003B2 (en) 2003-09-11 2011-10-11 Depuy Mitek, Inc. Tissue extraction and collection device
US7611473B2 (en) 2003-09-11 2009-11-03 Ethicon, Inc. Tissue extraction and maceration device
ES2432556T3 (en) 2004-08-04 2013-12-04 Evonik Corporation Methods for manufacturing supply devices and their devices
CA2596957C (en) * 2004-12-03 2015-04-14 New Jersey Institute Of Technology Substrate recognition by differentiable human mesenchymal stem cells
WO2006088946A2 (en) * 2005-02-14 2006-08-24 Mayo Medical Ventures Tissue support structure
AU2006292224B2 (en) * 2005-09-19 2013-08-01 Histogenics Corporation Cell-support matrix and a method for preparation thereof
US20090306776A1 (en) 2006-01-25 2009-12-10 Children's Medical Center Corporation Methods and procedures for ligament repair
BRPI0602372B8 (en) 2006-05-18 2021-06-22 Einco Biomaterial Ltda process for preparing composites based on bioceramics and biodegradable polymers and derived products
MX2008014732A (en) 2006-05-22 2009-04-07 Univ Columbia Systems and methods of microfluidic membraneless exchange using filtration of extraction fluid outlet streams.
CN101528822A (en) * 2006-07-05 2009-09-09 新加坡科技研究局 Porous polymeric articles
EP4162936A1 (en) 2006-09-28 2023-04-12 The Children's Medical Center Corporation Methods and collagen products for tissue repair
US8287895B1 (en) 2008-04-24 2012-10-16 Hrl Laboratories, Llc Three-dimensional biological scaffold compromising polymer waveguides
US8197930B1 (en) 2007-05-10 2012-06-12 Hrl Laboratories, Llc Three-dimensional ordered open-cellular structures
US7923478B2 (en) * 2006-12-28 2011-04-12 Bridgestone Corporation Nanoporous polymeric material and preparation method
GB0701896D0 (en) * 2007-02-01 2007-03-14 Regentec Ltd Composition
US8034014B2 (en) * 2007-03-06 2011-10-11 Biomet Biologics, Llc Angiogenesis initation and growth
US20090028921A1 (en) 2007-06-18 2009-01-29 New Jersey Institute Of Technology Electrospun Ceramic-Polymer Composite As A Scaffold For Tissue Repair
US20090054984A1 (en) 2007-08-20 2009-02-26 Histogenics Corporation Method For Use Of A Double-Structured Tissue Implant For Treatment Of Tissue Defects
US8070827B2 (en) * 2007-07-03 2011-12-06 Histogenics Corporation Method for use of a double-structured tissue implant for treatment of tissue defects
US8685107B2 (en) 2007-07-03 2014-04-01 Histogenics Corporation Double-structured tissue implant and a method for preparation and use thereof
EP2182887B1 (en) * 2007-08-20 2016-12-14 Histogenics Corporation A method for improvement of differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells using a double-structured tissue implant
ES2375187T3 (en) * 2007-08-29 2012-02-27 Vito Nv PROCEDURE TO PRODUCE A CONSTRUCTION OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL MACROPOROUS FILAMENTS BASED ON PHASE INVESTMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OBTAINED FROM THAT MODE.
EP2222281B1 (en) 2007-12-20 2018-12-05 Evonik Corporation Process for preparing microparticles having a low residual solvent volume
CA2714594A1 (en) 2008-02-04 2009-08-13 Edward F. Leonard Fluid separation devices, systems and methods
US20090325296A1 (en) 2008-03-25 2009-12-31 New Jersey Institute Of Technology Electrospun electroactive polymers for regenerative medicine applications
AU2009277252B2 (en) 2008-07-30 2014-01-16 Mesynthes Limited Tissue scaffolds derived from forestomach extracellular matrix
US9192655B2 (en) 2009-03-12 2015-11-24 New Jersey Institute Of Technology System and method for a hydrogel and hydrogel composite for cartilage repair applications
US9771557B2 (en) 2009-03-12 2017-09-26 New Jersey Institute Of Technology Piezoelectric scaffold for nerve growth and repair
US9476026B2 (en) 2009-03-12 2016-10-25 New Jersey Institute Of Technology Method of tissue repair using a piezoelectric scaffold
US9334476B2 (en) 2009-03-12 2016-05-10 New Jersey Institute Of Technology Method for nerve growth and repair using a piezoelectric scaffold
US20110076396A1 (en) * 2009-09-28 2011-03-31 Limin Guan Method of forming a calcium phosphate coating within a porous material
US9180166B2 (en) 2010-03-12 2015-11-10 New Jersey Institute Of Technology Cartilage repair systems and applications utilizing a glycosaminoglycan mimic
JP6189827B2 (en) 2011-04-13 2017-08-30 ニュー ジャージー インスティテューツ オブ テクノロジー Systems and methods for electrospinning biodegradable scaffolds for bone repair
US9415562B1 (en) * 2011-08-17 2016-08-16 Hrl Laboratories, Llc Ultra-light micro-lattices and a method for forming the same
US9539773B2 (en) 2011-12-06 2017-01-10 Hrl Laboratories, Llc Net-shape structure with micro-truss core
WO2013116744A1 (en) 2012-02-01 2013-08-08 Children's Medical Center Corporation Biomaterial for articular cartilage maintenance and treatment of arthritis
ITMI20120338A1 (en) * 2012-03-06 2013-09-07 Dr Andrea Bignotti THERAPEUTIC PREPARATION AND PREPARATION PROCEDURE FOR SUCH THERAPEUTIC PREPARATION
US9017806B2 (en) 2012-03-23 2015-04-28 Hrl Laboratories, Llc High airflow micro-truss structural apparatus
EP3798226A1 (en) 2013-02-01 2021-03-31 Children's Medical Center Corporation Collagen scaffolds
US10077420B2 (en) 2014-12-02 2018-09-18 Histogenics Corporation Cell and tissue culture container
ES2578705B1 (en) * 2015-01-28 2017-08-04 Universitat Politècnica De Catalunya Macroporous scaffolding for bone tissue engineering, three-dimensional design method and applications
WO2020185874A1 (en) * 2019-03-11 2020-09-17 Encellin, Inc. Cell encapsulation devices and methods of using same
US20200291340A1 (en) * 2019-03-13 2020-09-17 Sepragen Corporation Lattice For Cell Culture

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5041138A (en) * 1986-11-20 1991-08-20 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Neomorphogenesis of cartilage in vivo from cell culture
US5228994A (en) * 1992-10-13 1993-07-20 Millipore Corporation Composite microporous membranes
US5338772A (en) * 1991-06-20 1994-08-16 Merck Patent Gesellschaft Mit Beschrankter Haftung Implant material
US5498335A (en) * 1992-04-14 1996-03-12 Millipore Corporation Process for forming porous polmyeric product from a nonporous polymeric composition and product
US5514378A (en) * 1993-02-01 1996-05-07 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Biocompatible polymer membranes and methods of preparation of three dimensional membrane structures

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3372342B2 (en) * 1993-08-31 2003-02-04 フロイント産業株式会社 Sugar coating method and apparatus
GB2301362B (en) 1995-05-30 1999-01-06 Johnson & Johnson Medical Absorbable implant materials having controlled porosity

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5041138A (en) * 1986-11-20 1991-08-20 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Neomorphogenesis of cartilage in vivo from cell culture
US5338772A (en) * 1991-06-20 1994-08-16 Merck Patent Gesellschaft Mit Beschrankter Haftung Implant material
US5498335A (en) * 1992-04-14 1996-03-12 Millipore Corporation Process for forming porous polmyeric product from a nonporous polymeric composition and product
US5228994A (en) * 1992-10-13 1993-07-20 Millipore Corporation Composite microporous membranes
US5514378A (en) * 1993-02-01 1996-05-07 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Biocompatible polymer membranes and methods of preparation of three dimensional membrane structures

Cited By (37)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050106255A1 (en) * 1999-03-17 2005-05-19 Ku David N. Poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel
US20050071003A1 (en) * 1999-03-17 2005-03-31 Ku David N. Poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel
US20070248933A1 (en) * 2003-10-10 2007-10-25 Dentigenix Inc. Methods for treating dental conditions using tissue scaffolds
US8895073B2 (en) 2004-02-06 2014-11-25 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Hydrogel implant with superficial pores
US20080279943A1 (en) * 2004-02-06 2008-11-13 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Method of making hydrogel implants
US20050273178A1 (en) * 2004-02-06 2005-12-08 Boyan Barbara D Load bearing biocompatible device
US20090263446A1 (en) * 2004-02-06 2009-10-22 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Method of making load bearing hydrogel implants
US7682540B2 (en) 2004-02-06 2010-03-23 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Method of making hydrogel implants
US8486436B2 (en) 2004-02-06 2013-07-16 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Articular joint implant
US7910124B2 (en) 2004-02-06 2011-03-22 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Load bearing biocompatible device
US20110172771A1 (en) * 2004-02-06 2011-07-14 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Hydrogel implant with superficial pores
US8002830B2 (en) 2004-02-06 2011-08-23 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Surface directed cellular attachment
US8142808B2 (en) 2004-02-06 2012-03-27 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Method of treating joints with hydrogel implants
US8318192B2 (en) 2004-02-06 2012-11-27 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Method of making load bearing hydrogel implants
US20050278025A1 (en) * 2004-06-10 2005-12-15 Salumedica Llc Meniscus prosthesis
US10945854B2 (en) * 2007-02-28 2021-03-16 Happe Spine, Llc Porous composite biomaterials and related methods
US20140236299A1 (en) * 2007-02-28 2014-08-21 Ryan K. Roeder Porous composite biomaterials and related methods
US20090061517A1 (en) * 2007-05-31 2009-03-05 Kisaalita William S Cell culture apparatus and methods of making and using same
US20110023430A1 (en) * 2007-08-31 2011-02-03 Amit Kumar Multiple Layer Substrate Support and Exhaust Gas Treatment Device
US11278411B2 (en) 2011-05-26 2022-03-22 Cartiva, Inc. Devices and methods for creating wedge-shaped recesses
US11944545B2 (en) 2011-05-26 2024-04-02 Cartiva, Inc. Implant introducer
US9526632B2 (en) 2011-05-26 2016-12-27 Cartiva, Inc. Methods of repairing a joint using a wedge-shaped implant
US10376368B2 (en) 2011-05-26 2019-08-13 Cartiva, Inc. Devices and methods for creating wedge-shaped recesses
US9155543B2 (en) 2011-05-26 2015-10-13 Cartiva, Inc. Tapered joint implant and related tools
US10350072B2 (en) 2012-05-24 2019-07-16 Cartiva, Inc. Tooling for creating tapered opening in tissue and related methods
US11883246B2 (en) 2012-11-21 2024-01-30 Trustees Of Boston University Tissue markers and uses thereof
WO2014081940A1 (en) * 2012-11-21 2014-05-30 Trustees Of Boston University Tissue markers and uses thereof
WO2015017626A1 (en) * 2013-08-02 2015-02-05 University Of South Florida (A Florida Non-Profit Corporation) Three dimensional fibrous scaffolds for cell culture
US20180305014A1 (en) * 2014-02-28 2018-10-25 Lucas J. Myslinski Drone device for real estate
US10758374B2 (en) 2015-03-31 2020-09-01 Cartiva, Inc. Carpometacarpal (CMC) implants and methods
US10973644B2 (en) 2015-03-31 2021-04-13 Cartiva, Inc. Hydrogel implants with porous materials and methods
US11839552B2 (en) 2015-03-31 2023-12-12 Cartiva, Inc. Carpometacarpal (CMC) implants and methods
US9907663B2 (en) 2015-03-31 2018-03-06 Cartiva, Inc. Hydrogel implants with porous materials and methods
US11717411B2 (en) 2015-03-31 2023-08-08 Cartiva, Inc. Hydrogel implants with porous materials and methods
US10952858B2 (en) 2015-04-14 2021-03-23 Cartiva, Inc. Tooling for creating tapered opening in tissue and related methods
US11701231B2 (en) 2015-04-14 2023-07-18 Cartiva, Inc. Tooling for creating tapered opening in tissue and related methods
US11020231B2 (en) 2015-04-14 2021-06-01 Cartiva, Inc. Tooling for creating tapered opening in tissue and related methods

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US6875442B2 (en) 2005-04-05
US6472210B1 (en) 2002-10-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6875442B2 (en) Process for growing tissue in a biocompatible macroporous polymer scaffold and products therefrom
US7022522B2 (en) Macroporous polymer scaffold containing calcium phosphate particles
US6379962B1 (en) Polymer scaffold having microporous polymer struts defining interconnected macropores
Reverchon et al. Supercritical fluids in 3-D tissue engineering
US5686091A (en) Biodegradable foams for cell transplantation
AU714647B2 (en) Polysaccharide sponges for cell culture and transplantation
AU776878B2 (en) Cartilage tissue engineering
EP1027897B1 (en) Cartillage tissue engineering
JP4406283B2 (en) Tissue regeneration substrate, transplant material, and production method thereof
US20100267143A1 (en) Method for Surface Modification of Polymeric Scaffold for Stem Cell Transplantation Using Decellularized Extracellular Matrix
Zhang et al. A study on a tissue-engineered bone using rhBMP-2 induced periosteal cells with a porous nano-hydroxyapatite/collagen/poly (L-lactic acid) scaffold
US20060147486A1 (en) Biodegradable dual porous scaffold wrapped with semi-permeable membrane and tissue cell culture using thereof
Wang et al. Polylactic acid scaffold with directional porous structure for large-segment bone repair
Higuera et al. PEOT/PBT Polymeric Pastes to Fabricate Additive Manufactured Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering
MXPA00004740A (en) Biodegradable polymer scaffold
Wang Improving 3D matrices for tissue engineering using advanced drug delivery techniques
AU2013206694A1 (en) Cell-support matrix and a method for preparation thereof
JP2003325657A (en) Member for forming joint cartilage and method of manufacturing the member, method of regenerating or forming and culturing the joint cartilage, and artificial joint cartilage for transplantation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: BONETEC CORPORATION, CANADA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HOLY, CHANTAL ELIZABETH;SHOICHET, MOLLY SANDRA;DAVIES, JOHN EDWARD;REEL/FRAME:013195/0032

Effective date: 19990202

Owner name: DAVIES, JOHN EDWARD, CANADA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO, THE;REEL/FRAME:013195/0064

Effective date: 19970414

Owner name: GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO, TH

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HOLY, CHANTAL ELIZABETH;SHOICHET, MOLLY SANDRA;DAVIES, JOHN EDWARD;REEL/FRAME:013195/0039

Effective date: 19970408

Owner name: HOLY, CHANTAL ELIZABETH, CANADA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO, THE;REEL/FRAME:013195/0064

Effective date: 19970414

Owner name: SHOICHET, MOLLY SANDRA, CANADA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO, THE;REEL/FRAME:013195/0064

Effective date: 19970414

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees
STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20170405