EP3112253A1 - A method of maneuvering a smaller ship away from a larger ship - Google Patents
A method of maneuvering a smaller ship away from a larger ship Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP3112253A1 EP3112253A1 EP15174233.5A EP15174233A EP3112253A1 EP 3112253 A1 EP3112253 A1 EP 3112253A1 EP 15174233 A EP15174233 A EP 15174233A EP 3112253 A1 EP3112253 A1 EP 3112253A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- ship
- bow
- smaller
- larger
- magnus rotor
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63H—MARINE PROPULSION OR STEERING
- B63H25/00—Steering; Slowing-down otherwise than by use of propulsive elements; Dynamic anchoring, i.e. positioning vessels by means of main or auxiliary propulsive elements
- B63H25/06—Steering by rudders
- B63H25/38—Rudders
- B63H25/40—Rudders using Magnus effect
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B35/00—Vessels or similar floating structures specially adapted for specific purposes and not otherwise provided for
- B63B35/66—Tugs
- B63B35/70—Tugs for pushing
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method of maneuvering a smaller ship away from a larger ship, wherein initially the smaller ship is located alongside and against a larger ship and both ships have the same course and the same speed.
- Such a method of maneuvering is typically performed in case of a pilot vessel which sails alongside a sea-going ship in order to board a pilot.
- the pilot vessel is much smaller than the ship to serve and has, generally, high maneuvering capabilities and a high maximum speed in order to quickly serve many sea-going vessels one after the other.
- the pilot vessel may have propulsion concepts as twin screws, water jets and steerable propulsion.
- the pilot vessel is maneuvered alongside and in most cases with its bow or midsection against the sea-going vessel so that a pilot can board or disembark the sea-going vessel. During this boarding or disembarking both ships have the same speed and move in the same direction. After boarding or disembarking the pilot the pilot vessel proceeds to a next vessel.
- a first known embodiment of the method for moving the pilot vessel away from the sea-going vessel often requires that the pilot vessel diminishes its speed until it is free from the sea-going vessel. This speed reduction takes time and diminishes the effective use of the pilot vessel.
- the pilot vessel has amidships a large fender between the pilot vessel and the sea-going vessel and when sailing away from the sea-going vessel the pilot vessel rotates around this fender with its stern to the sea-going vessel. This might lead to collision of the stern of the pilot vessel with the side of the sea-going vessel, which is undesirable.
- the present invention provides a method of maneuvering the smaller ship away from the larger ship by means of changing the orientation of a bow rudder of the smaller ship or activating a Magnus rotor at the bow of the smaller ship.
- the method according to the invention overcomes the earlier described disadvantages and appears to be highly effective to maneuver the smaller ship easily away from the larger ship.
- Magnus rotor In case of the presence of a Magnus rotor at the bow of the smaller ship, a lateral force on the front side of the smaller ship is created by activating it.
- An advantage of applying a Magnus rotor is that its size does not increase upon activating it.
- the Magnus rotor may be located within the circumference of the hull of the smaller ship as seen from above and may remain there upon activating it. This minimizes the risk of hitting the larger ship or any other obstacle during maneuvering.
- the length of the larger ship may be more than three times larger than the length of the smaller ship. This is typically a condition in which conventional methods of maneuvering the smaller ship away from the larger ship is difficult.
- the smaller ship may comprise a pilot vessel and the larger ship may comprise a sea-going vessel, which transports passengers or load between sea harbours.
- the bow rudder or the Magnus rotor may project or is projectable below the bow of the smaller ship in order to make the bow rudder or Magnus rotor more effective.
- the bow rudder or the Magnus rotor is movable with respect to the bow in vertical direction, since this minimizes the risk of a collision in shallow water or getting stuck in a fishnet or the like.
- the bow rudder or the Magnus rotor may be movable with respect to the bow in vertical direction from below the bow into the bow and vice versa.
- the Magnus rotor may be moved downwardly along its longitudinal axis upon activating it and moved upwardly after the smaller vessel has left the larger vessel. Alternatively, it may be moved downwardly and upwardly by means of linkage bars. During maneuvering the smaller ship away from the larger ship the rudder or the Magnus rotor can extend below the bow of the smaller ship.
- the smaller ship may have a substantially vertical bow. This facilitates placing of a bow rudder or a Magnus rotor and reduces the vertical movement of the bow in heavier seas and ensures that the rudder or Magnus rotor remains immersed and remains effective.
- Fig. 1 shows two ships as seen from above.
- a smaller ship 1 is a pilot vessel and a larger ship 2 is a sea-going vessel, for example a freight carrier.
- the dimensions of the larger ship 2 are much larger than of the smaller ship 1.
- the first vessel 1 is located alongside the larger ship 2 and both ships have the same sailing direction and the same sailing speed.
- a pilot may move between the smaller ship 1 and the larger ship 2.
- the period of time during which the smaller ship 1 is located alongside the larger ship 2 is as short as possible.
- the smaller ship 1 leaves the larger ship 2.
- Fig. 1 shows an initial situation in which both ships have the same course and the same speed.
- the smaller ship 1 includes a bow rudder 3.
- the orientation of the bow rudder 3 can be changed so as to maneuver away from the larger ship 2. This is illustrated in Fig. 2 .
- the bow rudder 3 may have numerous shapes and dimensions.
- European patent EP 2 040 978 shows several examples.
- the new orientation of the bow rudder 3 causes a lateral force of the water onto the bow rudder 3 near the bow of the smaller ship 1 in a direction away from the larger ship 2 without first pushing the rear of the smaller ship 1 towards the larger ship 2.
- the effect is illustrated in Fig. 3 .
- An advantage of controlling the bow rudder 3 in this situation is that at first a front side of the smaller ship 1 leaves the larger ship 2 after which the back side thereof follows. In conventional cases, upon using aft rudders it takes much more time to get the front side of the smaller ship 1 separated from the larger ship 2 or there is the risk that the rear side of the smaller ship 1 collides with the larger ship 2.
- Fig. 4 illustrates an alternative embodiment of the method according to the invention.
- Fig. 4 shows a foreship 4 of the smaller ship 1.
- the foreship 4 has a bow 5 where a Magnus rotor 6 is installed.
- the Magnus rotor 4 is activated, resulting in a lateral force in a similar way as with the bow rudder 3 as illustrated in Figs. 1-3 .
- Fig. 4 further shows that in this embodiment the bow 5 of the smaller ship 1 extends substantially vertically and the Magnus rotor 4 is mounted in the bow 5.
- Fig. 5 shows the foreship 4 of an alternative embodiment of the smaller ship 1.
- the Magnus rotor 6 is extendable downwards with respect to the bow 5 as illustrated by a double-headed arrow in Fig. 5 .
- the Magnus rotor 6 is moved downwardly along its longitudinal axis.
- the Magnus rotor 6 is retracted upwardly.
- the rudder or the Magnus rotor can be moved from a compartment in the hull of the ship behind the bow 5 to under or below the foreship 4 and the rudder or Magnus is activated when it is below the foreship 4.
- the invention provides an improved method for maneuvering the smaller ship away from the larger ship.
Abstract
A method of maneuvering a smaller ship which is located alongside a larger ship whereas both ships initially have the same course and the same speed. The smaller ship includes a bow rudder or a Magnus rotor at a bow thereof and is maneuvered away from the larger ship by means of changing the orientation of its bow rudder or activating its Magnus rotor, respectively.
Description
- The present invention relates to a method of maneuvering a smaller ship away from a larger ship, wherein initially the smaller ship is located alongside and against a larger ship and both ships have the same course and the same speed.
- Such a method of maneuvering is typically performed in case of a pilot vessel which sails alongside a sea-going ship in order to board a pilot. The pilot vessel is much smaller than the ship to serve and has, generally, high maneuvering capabilities and a high maximum speed in order to quickly serve many sea-going vessels one after the other. The pilot vessel may have propulsion concepts as twin screws, water jets and steerable propulsion.
- The pilot vessel is maneuvered alongside and in most cases with its bow or midsection against the sea-going vessel so that a pilot can board or disembark the sea-going vessel. During this boarding or disembarking both ships have the same speed and move in the same direction. After boarding or disembarking the pilot the pilot vessel proceeds to a next vessel. A first known embodiment of the method for moving the pilot vessel away from the sea-going vessel often requires that the pilot vessel diminishes its speed until it is free from the sea-going vessel. This speed reduction takes time and diminishes the effective use of the pilot vessel. In a second known embodiment the pilot vessel has amidships a large fender between the pilot vessel and the sea-going vessel and when sailing away from the sea-going vessel the pilot vessel rotates around this fender with its stern to the sea-going vessel. This might lead to collision of the stern of the pilot vessel with the side of the sea-going vessel, which is undesirable.
- The present invention provides a method of maneuvering the smaller ship away from the larger ship by means of changing the orientation of a bow rudder of the smaller ship or activating a Magnus rotor at the bow of the smaller ship.
- The method according to the invention overcomes the earlier described disadvantages and appears to be highly effective to maneuver the smaller ship easily away from the larger ship.
- In case of the presence of a Magnus rotor at the bow of the smaller ship, a lateral force on the front side of the smaller ship is created by activating it. An advantage of applying a Magnus rotor is that its size does not increase upon activating it. The Magnus rotor may be located within the circumference of the hull of the smaller ship as seen from above and may remain there upon activating it. This minimizes the risk of hitting the larger ship or any other obstacle during maneuvering.
- It is remarked that using a bow thruster that ejects water sideways from the bow of the hull of a ship does not function when the vessel has a more than minimal forward speed. For maneuvering a smaller ship away from a larger ship that both have a forward speed such a bow thruster has no use for steering the smaller ship away from the larger ship.
- The length of the larger ship may be more than three times larger than the length of the smaller ship. This is typically a condition in which conventional methods of maneuvering the smaller ship away from the larger ship is difficult.
- For example, the smaller ship may comprise a pilot vessel and the larger ship may comprise a sea-going vessel, which transports passengers or load between sea harbours.
- The bow rudder or the Magnus rotor may project or is projectable below the bow of the smaller ship in order to make the bow rudder or Magnus rotor more effective. Particularly, smaller ships like pilot vessels sail in relatively deep water such that space below the hull can be used for locating at least a part of the bow rudder or the Magnus rotor.
- In a preferred embodiment the bow rudder or the Magnus rotor is movable with respect to the bow in vertical direction, since this minimizes the risk of a collision in shallow water or getting stuck in a fishnet or the like. For example, the bow rudder or the Magnus rotor may be movable with respect to the bow in vertical direction from below the bow into the bow and vice versa. The Magnus rotor may be moved downwardly along its longitudinal axis upon activating it and moved upwardly after the smaller vessel has left the larger vessel. Alternatively, it may be moved downwardly and upwardly by means of linkage bars. During maneuvering the smaller ship away from the larger ship the rudder or the Magnus rotor can extend below the bow of the smaller ship.
- The smaller ship may have a substantially vertical bow. This facilitates placing of a bow rudder or a Magnus rotor and reduces the vertical movement of the bow in heavier seas and ensures that the rudder or Magnus rotor remains immersed and remains effective.
- The invention will hereafter be elucidated with reference to drawings showing an embodiment of the invention by way of example.
-
Figs. 1-3 are very schematic top views of two ships, illustrating an embodiment of a method according to the invention. -
Fig. 4 is a perspective view of a front side of a smaller ship in order to illustrate an alternative embodiment of the method according to the invention. -
Fig. 5 is a similar view asFig. 4 , but showing an alternative embodiment of the smaller ship. -
Fig. 1 shows two ships as seen from above. Asmaller ship 1 is a pilot vessel and alarger ship 2 is a sea-going vessel, for example a freight carrier. The dimensions of thelarger ship 2 are much larger than of thesmaller ship 1. In the situation as illustrated inFig. 1 thefirst vessel 1 is located alongside thelarger ship 2 and both ships have the same sailing direction and the same sailing speed. In this condition a pilot may move between thesmaller ship 1 and thelarger ship 2. Generally, the period of time during which thesmaller ship 1 is located alongside thelarger ship 2 is as short as possible. After transferring staff between the ships, thesmaller ship 1 leaves thelarger ship 2.Fig. 1 shows an initial situation in which both ships have the same course and the same speed. - The
smaller ship 1 includes abow rudder 3. When it is desired to leave its position alongside thelarger ship 2, the orientation of thebow rudder 3 can be changed so as to maneuver away from thelarger ship 2. This is illustrated inFig. 2 . Thebow rudder 3 may have numerous shapes and dimensions.European patent EP 2 040 978 shows several examples. - The new orientation of the
bow rudder 3 causes a lateral force of the water onto thebow rudder 3 near the bow of thesmaller ship 1 in a direction away from thelarger ship 2 without first pushing the rear of thesmaller ship 1 towards thelarger ship 2. The effect is illustrated inFig. 3 . An advantage of controlling thebow rudder 3 in this situation is that at first a front side of thesmaller ship 1 leaves thelarger ship 2 after which the back side thereof follows. In conventional cases, upon using aft rudders it takes much more time to get the front side of thesmaller ship 1 separated from thelarger ship 2 or there is the risk that the rear side of thesmaller ship 1 collides with thelarger ship 2. -
Fig. 4 illustrates an alternative embodiment of the method according to the invention.Fig. 4 shows aforeship 4 of thesmaller ship 1. Theforeship 4 has abow 5 where a Magnusrotor 6 is installed. When the smaller ship is upon leaving thelarger ship 2 the Magnusrotor 4 is activated, resulting in a lateral force in a similar way as with thebow rudder 3 as illustrated inFigs. 1-3 .Fig. 4 further shows that in this embodiment thebow 5 of thesmaller ship 1 extends substantially vertically and the Magnusrotor 4 is mounted in thebow 5. -
Fig. 5 shows theforeship 4 of an alternative embodiment of thesmaller ship 1. In this case, the Magnusrotor 6 is extendable downwards with respect to thebow 5 as illustrated by a double-headed arrow inFig. 5 . Upon activating the Magnusrotor 6 in order to leave thelarger ship 2 the Magnusrotor 6 is moved downwardly along its longitudinal axis. After thesmaller vessel 1 has left thelarger vessel 2 theMagnus rotor 6 is retracted upwardly. In another embodiment the rudder or the Magnus rotor can be moved from a compartment in the hull of the ship behind thebow 5 to under or below theforeship 4 and the rudder or Magnus is activated when it is below theforeship 4. - From the foregoing, it will be clear that the invention provides an improved method for maneuvering the smaller ship away from the larger ship.
- The invention is not limited to the embodiment shown in the drawings and described hereinbefore, which may be varied in different manners within the scope of the claims and their technical equivalents.
Claims (7)
- A method of maneuvering a smaller ship (1) which is located alongside a larger ship (2) whereas both ships (1, 2) initially have the same course and the same speed, wherein the smaller ship (1) includes a bow rudder (3) or a Magnus rotor (6) at a bow (5) thereof and is maneuvered away from the larger ship (2) by means of changing the orientation of its bow rudder (3) or activating its Magnus rotor (6), respectively.
- A method according to claim 1, wherein the length of the larger ship (2) is more than three times larger than the length of the smaller ship (1).
- A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the smaller ship (1) comprises a pilot vessel and the larger ship (2) comprises a sea-going vessel.
- A method according to one of the preceding claims, wherein the bow rudder (3) or the Magnus rotor (6) projects below the bow (5) of the smaller ship (1).
- A method according to claim 4, wherein the bow rudder (3) or the Magnus rotor (6) is movable in vertical direction with respect to the bow (5).
- A method according to claim 5, wherein the bow rudder (3) or the Magnus rotor (6) is movable between a position in the bow (5) and a position below the bow (5).
- A method according to one of the preceding claims, wherein the smaller ship (1) has a substantially vertical bow (5).
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP15174233.5A EP3112253A1 (en) | 2015-06-29 | 2015-06-29 | A method of maneuvering a smaller ship away from a larger ship |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP15174233.5A EP3112253A1 (en) | 2015-06-29 | 2015-06-29 | A method of maneuvering a smaller ship away from a larger ship |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3112253A1 true EP3112253A1 (en) | 2017-01-04 |
Family
ID=53513991
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP15174233.5A Withdrawn EP3112253A1 (en) | 2015-06-29 | 2015-06-29 | A method of maneuvering a smaller ship away from a larger ship |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP3112253A1 (en) |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB1170297A (en) * | 1967-02-07 | 1969-11-12 | Hydroconic Ltd | Improvements in or relating to Steering Systems for Marine Vessels |
DE3815792A1 (en) * | 1988-05-09 | 1990-01-04 | Schueler Joerg | Transverse rotor rudder for ships |
DE10225128A1 (en) * | 2002-06-06 | 2003-12-18 | Ullrich Meyer | Ships rudder layout employs rudders at bow on starboard and port sides to be lowered simultaneously at optimum angle to ships axis. |
EP1873055A1 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2008-01-02 | Technische Universiteit Delft | Ship with bow control surface |
-
2015
- 2015-06-29 EP EP15174233.5A patent/EP3112253A1/en not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB1170297A (en) * | 1967-02-07 | 1969-11-12 | Hydroconic Ltd | Improvements in or relating to Steering Systems for Marine Vessels |
DE3815792A1 (en) * | 1988-05-09 | 1990-01-04 | Schueler Joerg | Transverse rotor rudder for ships |
DE10225128A1 (en) * | 2002-06-06 | 2003-12-18 | Ullrich Meyer | Ships rudder layout employs rudders at bow on starboard and port sides to be lowered simultaneously at optimum angle to ships axis. |
EP1873055A1 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2008-01-02 | Technische Universiteit Delft | Ship with bow control surface |
EP2040978A1 (en) | 2006-06-30 | 2009-04-01 | Technische Universiteit Delft | Ship with bow control surface |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20210300505A1 (en) | Boat having an improved ability to get on plane and improved method of getting a boat on plane | |
US9969463B2 (en) | Vessel control system with movable underwater wings | |
WO2009007497A3 (en) | Method for improving the ice-breaking properties of a water craft and a water craft constructed according to the method | |
US11708133B2 (en) | Device for recovering a water vehicle | |
EP3166842B1 (en) | System and method for launching, and recovering, a daughter boat from a stern of a mother ship | |
EP2547581B1 (en) | Ship with azimuting tractor drive | |
WO2022019764A2 (en) | Safety strut assembly for hydrofoil craft | |
US5694877A (en) | Ship docking vessel | |
NO309896B1 (en) | Surface-cutting sea-going vessels with ground effect | |
EP3112253A1 (en) | A method of maneuvering a smaller ship away from a larger ship | |
CN204110313U (en) | A kind of hull bottom reducing the resistance that moves ahead | |
WO2011078737A3 (en) | Method for moving a vessel in water and vessel for moving in water according to said method | |
RU2611666C2 (en) | Front-drive boat with transverse redan | |
US20080141916A1 (en) | Small Vessel Capable Of High Tow Force | |
RU2592755C2 (en) | Hydro-aerodynamic propulsor, principle for aero-gliding on water | |
RU2615031C2 (en) | Method for movement on "water cushion" and gliding vessel for its implementation | |
EP3186143B1 (en) | High speed triangular shaped hydroplaning monohull craft with aircraft-like control surfaces having surface adhesion hull characteristics | |
RU217176U1 (en) | HULL OF THE SHIP-TUG | |
US3636906A (en) | Hydroglyder | |
US3452698A (en) | Power-driven hydroplane watercraft | |
JP7451516B2 (en) | Equipment for recovering ships | |
RU222507U1 (en) | TUG HULL | |
WO2017181237A1 (en) | Wave generating apparatus | |
EP4043330A1 (en) | Marine vessel comprising a planing hull | |
JP2017094984A (en) | Landing ship, and control method for landing ship |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 20170705 |