EP0474360A2 - A system for validating the authenticity of a transaction employing electronic receipts - Google Patents
A system for validating the authenticity of a transaction employing electronic receipts Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0474360A2 EP0474360A2 EP91307072A EP91307072A EP0474360A2 EP 0474360 A2 EP0474360 A2 EP 0474360A2 EP 91307072 A EP91307072 A EP 91307072A EP 91307072 A EP91307072 A EP 91307072A EP 0474360 A2 EP0474360 A2 EP 0474360A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- transaction
- receipt
- purchaser
- parameters
- terminal
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07G—REGISTERING THE RECEIPT OF CASH, VALUABLES, OR TOKENS
- G07G1/00—Cash registers
- G07G1/0036—Checkout procedures
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C9/00—Individual registration on entry or exit
- G07C9/20—Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass
- G07C9/22—Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass in combination with an identity check of the pass holder
- G07C9/24—Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass in combination with an identity check of the pass holder by means of a handwritten signature
- G07C9/247—Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass in combination with an identity check of the pass holder by means of a handwritten signature electronically, e.g. by comparing signal of hand-writing with a reference signal from the pass
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07G—REGISTERING THE RECEIPT OF CASH, VALUABLES, OR TOKENS
- G07G1/00—Cash registers
- G07G1/12—Cash registers electronically operated
Definitions
- the subject invention relates to a system for authenticating transactions.
- the subject invention is suitable for use with transaction card systems which heretofore have required hard copy receipts to authenticate transactions.
- transaction cards are used as the preferred form of payment in a large number of transactions for the purchase of goods and services.
- the customer presents the card at the point of purchase.
- the merchant will then take some steps to determine if the card if valid. If the merchant decides to accept the card, the transaction can be completed.
- This receipt also includes various parameters identifying the transaction. These parameters typically include the account number of the card, expiration date, an identification of the merchant, the date, an approval code and the amount of the transaction.
- the hard copy receipt is actually a composite of two to four essentially identical copies. After the customer has signed the receipt, he is usually given one of the copies. The customer saves this receipt for his records. One or more copies are retained by the merchant. Another copy of the receipt is sent to the financial institution associated with the merchant and responsible for generating the information that will ultimately result in a debit to the account of the customer.
- financial institutions generally save all the receipts from all transactions until payment is received. However, after the information from the receipts is used to bill the clients, they are not accessed again unless a dispute as to the authenticity of the transaction arises. More particularly, if a customer questions a bill for a particular transaction, he will contact the financial institution which issued his card. The latter institution will start an inquiry which includes the financial institution associated with the merchant identified on the customer's bill. The merchant's financial institution will then track down the receipt and prepare a copy for transmittal to the purchaser. Assuming the transaction was valid, the signature on the receipt is usually sufficient evidence to convince the customer that the purchase was made and that he is liable for the amount of the bill.
- PIN personal identification number
- the requirement of supplying a PIN adds an additional level of security for the transaction.
- the response by the financial institution is limited to a statement to the customer that his PIN was used at the point of sale. No actual proof can be given to the customer which supports this statement.
- proof could be given a purchaser is much more willing to accept physical evidence of his signature as proof that he is liable for a transaction.
- the subject invention provides a method and system for validating the authenticity of a transaction.
- the system includes a terminal located at the point of sale for capturing the parameters of the transaction.
- the terminal is like prior art terminals including electronic cash registers and other state of the art point of sale systems.
- the terminal is also provided with a means for electronically capturing data, supplied by the purchaser, and uniquely identifying that purchaser.
- data is a digital representation of a signature.
- methods which can be used to generate a digital representation of a signature. For example, various digitizing pads and/or pens having pressure activated transducers have been used to record the digital signature information.
- the digitized signature is created using a combination of a CRT and light pen.
- the latter combination has been used to record signatures in the prior art. (See, U.S. Patent No. 4,656,662, issued April 7, 1987). Although not clearly stated in the patent, it appears that the latter system was designed to generate a plurality of reference signatures for a customer base of a financial institution. These reference signatures could be accessed by the financial institution to identify a customer's signature, for example, when clearing a check. This approach would enable a financial institution to do away with signature cards.
- the digitized signature and the parameters of the transaction are stored in the terminal. All the data can then be transmitted from the terminal to the processor at the financial institution associated with the merchant (typically referred to as the acquirer). The acquirer will store this data until the payment for the transaction has been received. However, if the purchaser requests verification of the transaction, this data can be retrieved and a hard copy thereof can be generated. A variety of devices are available for converting the electronic data into a hard copy receipt. This hard copy receipt can then be supplied to the customer to validate the transaction and induce payment for the purchase.
- Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of a typical transaction card network in which the subject invention can be implemented.
- Figure 2 is a perspective view, partially in schematic, of a terminal for use in the system of the subject invention.
- FIG 1 there is illustrated a schematic diagram of a typical transaction card network 10.
- the network includes a plurality of financial institutions 20 that issue transaction cards 22 to customers.
- the network also includes a number of merchants 34 where the customer can purchase goods and services by using the payment card 22.
- Each merchant is associated with its own financial institution known as the acquirer 26.
- the issuers and the acquirers are tied together into the network via a central processor 28 maintained by the network operator (ie. such as Visa or Mastercard).
- the network operator ie. such as Visa or Mastercard
- the customer will present his card for a purchase.
- the merchant 34 will determine if the card is authentic through one of a number of approaches. For example, an authorization request can be generated and routed through the network to the issuer for approval. Additional information about authenticating cards can be found in U.S. Patent No. 4,734,564, issued March 29, 1988. (It should be noted that in some transactions, the issuer and the acquirer are the same financial institution. In this case, intervention by the network operator is unnecessary.)
- the purchase can be completed.
- the customer is typically asked to sign a hard copy receipt. At least one of these copies is eventually delivered to the acquirer.
- the information on this receipt is used by the acquirer to begin the billing process.
- the receipt is merely catalogued and stored. In the latter case, information about the transaction will have been supplied to the acquirer from the merchant in an electronic format.
- the acquirer Once the acquirer has received the parameters of the transaction, they can be routed through the central processor 28 to the appropriate issuer. The issuer 20 then bills the cardholder.
- the cardholder If the cardholder disputes a bill on his statement, he will contact the issuer 20. The issuer will then initiate a request for information from the acquirer. The acquirer will then provide a hard copy of the receipt, with the cardholder's signature to confirm the transaction.
- the creation, storage and retrieval of the purchase receipt is substantially simplified. More particularly, the terminal at the merchant is provided with a means for creating a digitized code signal consisting of a representation of the signature of the cardholder. This code signal, along with the parameters of the transaction, is then transmitted electronically to the acquirer. The acquirer stores this data until an inquiry is initiated by the cardholder. If such an inquiry is made, the acquirer can then generate a hard copy receipt which is supplied to the cardholder to authenticate the transaction.
- Figure 2 illustrates one type of terminal 36 which can be used to implement the subject invention.
- the terminal 36 can include a standard electronic cash register 38.
- This type of cash register has the capability of receiving inputs defining the date and amount of the transaction. This information can be stored in a digital fashion.
- a means is connected to the cash register 38 capable of creating a digitized version of the signature of the cardholder.
- the cash register 38 capable of creating a digitized version of the signature of the cardholder.
- the means is defined by a microprocessor driven module 40 including a CRT display 42 and a light pen 44.
- the module can also be provided with a means for reading the magnetic stripe on the transaction card (shown as a slot 46 in Figure 2).
- the merchant can enter the transaction parameters into the cash register 38.
- the merchant will then swipe the magnetic stripe of the transaction card through slot 46 so that card identifying data can be read.
- This card identifying data can be transmitted through the network to obtain an authorization.
- the authorization can include a confirmation that the card has not been reported as lost or stolen.
- the parameters of the transaction will be displayed on the CRT display 42. As shown in figure 2, these parameters can include the merchant name, date of the transaction, transaction amount, cardholder's name, and transaction number. The customer is then given a chance to review the displayed information for accuracy. If the data is dorrect, the customer will then "sign" the display using the light pen 44.
- the light pen includes a photodetector which is excited by the electron beam of the CRT.
- the current generated by the photodetector within the pen is correlated with the timing and position of the electron beam of the CRT to give positional information.
- the positional information is stored and supplied to the cash register 38.
- the unit can be programmed to display the signature as the user writes it on the CRT.
- the cash register can be used to generate a receipt, either with or without a facsimile of the signature. In this manner, the customer will have his own record of the transaction.
- the electronic digital data which includes the transaction parameters and the signature information, can either be stored at the merchant location or transmitted to the acquirer.
- the acquirer can use this data to initiate the steps necessary to cause the issuer to bill the purchaser.
- the acquirer will store this information until the payment has been received.
- a request for confirmation will be sent by the issuer to the acquirer.
- the processor 50 operated by the acquirer will retrieve the data,concerning the transaction from electronic storage 52 ( Figure 1).
- the digital data can then be converted into human readable form, preferably, a hard copy receipt.
- This receipt will include all the transaction parameters including a representation of the customer's signature.
- the hard copy receipt Once the hard copy receipt has been generated, it can be sent to the customer to validate the transaction. Once the customer is presented with the receipt having his signature, most disputes can be resolved. As can be appreciated, the customer can be provided with a confirming hard copy receipt even if a hard copy receipt was never generated at the point of sale. In this manner, the problems of transfer, cataloguing and storage of such receipts is eliminated.
- the identifying indicia need not be limited to the signature of the customer as any written code would suffice.
- the system could also be used to store and retrieve a PIN entry, providing proof to the customer that the valid PIN was entered.
- the human readable rendition of the receipt would not necessarily have to be a hard copy.
- the requested information could be electronically retrieved and used to generate a human readable image on a CRT screen where the customer is located. As long as the customer can review the information, the transaction can be validated.
Abstract
A digitized code signal representative of the signature of the purchaser is generated at the point of sale by the transaction terminal (36). This code signal along with the parameters of the transaction are stored (52) electronically. In the event that the customer questions the transaction, the financial institution (26) associated with the merchant (34) can generate a hard copy receipt which includes the parameters of the transaction as well as a representation of the signature of the purchaser. This hard copy receipt is then sent to the customer for validating the transaction. This eliminates the need to generate, transfer and store hard copy receipts unless they are specifically requested. At sale, transaction parameters are entered into an electronic cash register (38). A module (40) displays transaction data on a CRT (42). The module (40) may have a slot (46) for reading a magnetic stripe transaction card (22). Signature is effected with a light pen (44).
Description
- The subject invention relates to a system for authenticating transactions. The subject invention is suitable for use with transaction card systems which heretofore have required hard copy receipts to authenticate transactions.
- In today's environment, transaction cards are used as the preferred form of payment in a large number of transactions for the purchase of goods and services. There are different types of transaction or payment cards, such as credit and debit cards. In most cases, the customer presents the card at the point of purchase. The merchant will then take some steps to determine if the card if valid. If the merchant decides to accept the card, the transaction can be completed.
- In most transactions involving a payment card, the purchaser is requested to provide a signature on a hard copy receipt. This receipt also includes various parameters identifying the transaction. These parameters typically include the account number of the card, expiration date, an identification of the merchant, the date, an approval code and the amount of the transaction.
- The hard copy receipt is actually a composite of two to four essentially identical copies. After the customer has signed the receipt, he is usually given one of the copies. The customer saves this receipt for his records. One or more copies are retained by the merchant. Another copy of the receipt is sent to the financial institution associated with the merchant and responsible for generating the information that will ultimately result in a debit to the account of the customer.
- At the present time, financial institutions generally save all the receipts from all transactions until payment is received. However, after the information from the receipts is used to bill the clients, they are not accessed again unless a dispute as to the authenticity of the transaction arises. More particularly, if a customer questions a bill for a particular transaction, he will contact the financial institution which issued his card. The latter institution will start an inquiry which includes the financial institution associated with the merchant identified on the customer's bill. The merchant's financial institution will then track down the receipt and prepare a copy for transmittal to the purchaser. Assuming the transaction was valid, the signature on the receipt is usually sufficient evidence to convince the customer that the purchase was made and that he is liable for the amount of the bill.
- As can be appreciated, the need to store a very large volume of receipts in a manner that they can be accessed is a problem. This problem has been addressed in a number of ways. One approach has relied on the use of microfilm technology. In this approach, all of the receipts are microfilmed and catalogued to facilitate retrieval.
- Another, more sophisticated approach is through the use of electronic image generation, storage and retrieval systems. Using these systems,the financial institution can generate a digital image of each of the receipts in much the same way as a facsimile machine converts an image to electronic impulses. These digital images can be catalogued and stored and regenerated as hard copies upon request to validate a transaction.
- While the latter approaches alleviate the storage problem, they fail to address the more expensive and time consuming problem of actually handling the'receipts. As noted above, a copy of every receipt must be transferred from the merchant to the associated financial institution. Thereafter, the financial institution must have human operators catalog and store the receipts, whether in hard copy, microfilm or electronic format.
- One approach which has been suggested to eliminate the use of hard copy receipts is to require the user to supply a personal identification number (PIN), instead of a signature, at the time of the transaction. The requirement of supplying a PIN adds an additional level of security for the transaction. However, it does not provide a satisfactory solution to an inquiry by a purchaser. The response by the financial institution is limited to a statement to the customer that his PIN was used at the point of sale. No actual proof can be given to the customer which supports this statement. Moreover, even if proof could be given, a purchaser is much more willing to accept physical evidence of his signature as proof that he is liable for a transaction.
- Therefore, it is an object of the subject invention to provide a system for authenticating a transaction that overcomes the problems of the prior art approaches.
- It is another object of the subject invention to provide a system for authenticating transactions which eliminates the need to transfer'and catalogue hard copy receipts.
- It is a further object of the subject invention to provide a system for authenticating transactions which does not require transfer of a hard copy receipt, yet allows for the subsequent generation of such a receipt upon request.
- It is still another object of the subject invention to provide a system for authenticating transactions which includes a terminal, or peripheral to a terminal, capable of generating a digitized code signal based on data uniquely identifying a purchaser.
- It is still a further object of the subject invention to provide a system for authenticating transactions which includes a terminal capable of generating a digitized code signal based on the signature of a purchaser.
- It is still another object of the subject invention to provide a system for authenticating transactions which includes a terminal capable of generating a digitized code signal based on data uniquely identifying a purchaser and storing said code signal along with the parameters of the transaction.
- It is still a further object of the subject invention to provide a system for authenticating transactions which includes a terminal capable of generating a digitized code signal based on data uniquely identifying a purchaser and storing said code signal along with the parameters of the transaction, with the data being used at a subsequent time to generate a hard copy receipt.
- In accordance with these and many other objects, the subject invention provides a method and system for validating the authenticity of a transaction. The system includes a terminal located at the point of sale for capturing the parameters of the transaction. In this respect, the terminal is like prior art terminals including electronic cash registers and other state of the art point of sale systems.
- In accordance with the subject invention, the terminal is also provided with a means for electronically capturing data, supplied by the purchaser, and uniquely identifying that purchaser. In the preferred embodiment that data is a digital representation of a signature. There are a number of methods which can be used to generate a digital representation of a signature. For example, various digitizing pads and/or pens having pressure activated transducers have been used to record the digital signature information.
- In the preferred embodiment of the subject invention, the digitized signature is created using a combination of a CRT and light pen. The latter combination has been used to record signatures in the prior art. (See, U.S. Patent No. 4,656,662, issued April 7, 1987). Although not clearly stated in the patent, it appears that the latter system was designed to generate a plurality of reference signatures for a customer base of a financial institution. These reference signatures could be accessed by the financial institution to identify a customer's signature, for example, when clearing a check. This approach would enable a financial institution to do away with signature cards.
- In accordance with the subject invention, the digitized signature and the parameters of the transaction are stored in the terminal. All the data can then be transmitted from the terminal to the processor at the financial institution associated with the merchant (typically referred to as the acquirer). The acquirer will store this data until the payment for the transaction has been received. However, if the purchaser requests verification of the transaction, this data can be retrieved and a hard copy thereof can be generated. A variety of devices are available for converting the electronic data into a hard copy receipt. This hard copy receipt can then be supplied to the customer to validate the transaction and induce payment for the purchase.
- As can be appreciated, the subject system allows for the same type of verification which is presently available but eliminates the need to create, catalogue and store physical, hard copy receipts. further objects and advantages will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
- Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of a typical transaction card network in which the subject invention can be implemented.
- Figure 2 is a perspective view, partially in schematic, of a terminal for use in the system of the subject invention.
- Turning to figure 1 there is illustrated a schematic diagram of a typical
transaction card network 10. A more detailed description of this type of network is set forth in U.S. Patent No. 4,485,300, issued march 27, 1984, and incorporated herein by reference. Briefly, the network includes a plurality offinancial institutions 20 that issue transaction cards 22 to customers. The network also includes a number ofmerchants 34 where the customer can purchase goods and services by using the payment card 22. Each merchant is associated with its own financial institution known as theacquirer 26. - The issuers and the acquirers are tied together into the network via a
central processor 28 maintained by the network operator (ie. such as Visa or Mastercard). In a typical credit card transaction, the customer will present his card for a purchase. Themerchant 34 will determine if the card is authentic through one of a number of approaches. For example, an authorization request can be generated and routed through the network to the issuer for approval. Additional information about authenticating cards can be found in U.S. Patent No. 4,734,564, issued March 29, 1988. (It should be noted that in some transactions, the issuer and the acquirer are the same financial institution. In this case, intervention by the network operator is unnecessary.) - If the card has been authenticated, the purchase can be completed. As noted above, the customer is typically asked to sign a hard copy receipt. At least one of these copies is eventually delivered to the acquirer. In some cases, the information on this receipt is used by the acquirer to begin the billing process. In other cases, the receipt is merely catalogued and stored. In the latter case, information about the transaction will have been supplied to the acquirer from the merchant in an electronic format. There exists in the prior art a wide variety of merchant terminals which can capture the parameters of the transaction and periodically transmit them to the acquirer.
- Once the acquirer has received the parameters of the transaction, they can be routed through the
central processor 28 to the appropriate issuer. Theissuer 20 then bills the cardholder. - If the cardholder disputes a bill on his statement, he will contact the
issuer 20. The issuer will then initiate a request for information from the acquirer. The acquirer will then provide a hard copy of the receipt, with the cardholder's signature to confirm the transaction. - In accordance with the subject invention, the creation, storage and retrieval of the purchase receipt is substantially simplified. More particularly, the terminal at the merchant is provided with a means for creating a digitized code signal consisting of a representation of the signature of the cardholder. This code signal, along with the parameters of the transaction, is then transmitted electronically to the acquirer. The acquirer stores this data until an inquiry is initiated by the cardholder. If such an inquiry is made, the acquirer can then generate a hard copy receipt which is supplied to the cardholder to authenticate the transaction.
- Figure 2 illustrates one type of
terminal 36 which can be used to implement the subject invention. The terminal 36 can include a standardelectronic cash register 38. This type of cash register has the capability of receiving inputs defining the date and amount of the transaction. This information can be stored in a digital fashion. - In accordance with the subject invention, a means is connected to the
cash register 38 capable of creating a digitized version of the signature of the cardholder. As noted above, there are a number of devices available for converting the pen strokes of an individual into digital signals. For example, pressure pads and/or digitizing pens could be used. - In the preferred embodiment, the means is defined by a microprocessor driven
module 40 including aCRT display 42 and alight pen 44. The module can also be provided with a means for reading the magnetic stripe on the transaction card (shown as aslot 46 in Figure 2). - In operation, the merchant can enter the transaction parameters into the
cash register 38. The merchant will then swipe the magnetic stripe of the transaction card throughslot 46 so that card identifying data can be read. This card identifying data can be transmitted through the network to obtain an authorization. The authorization can include a confirmation that the card has not been reported as lost or stolen. - Assuming that the transaction has been authorized, the parameters of the transaction will be displayed on the
CRT display 42. As shown in figure 2, these parameters can include the merchant name, date of the transaction, transaction amount, cardholder's name, and transaction number. The customer is then given a chance to review the displayed information for accuracy. If the data is dorrect, the customer will then "sign" the display using thelight pen 44. - As noted above, the use of the combination of a light pen and CRT display for digitizing handwritten data is well known and will not be described in detail. Briefly, in this type of device, the light pen includes a photodetector which is excited by the electron beam of the CRT. The current generated by the photodetector within the pen is correlated with the timing and position of the electron beam of the CRT to give positional information. The positional information is stored and supplied to the
cash register 38. The unit can be programmed to display the signature as the user writes it on the CRT. - Once the user finishes entering his signature, the cash register can be used to generate a receipt, either with or without a facsimile of the signature. In this manner, the customer will have his own record of the transaction.
- In accordance with the subject invention, no additional hard copy receipt needs to be generated at the time of purchase. The electronic digital data, which includes the transaction parameters and the signature information, can either be stored at the merchant location or transmitted to the acquirer. The acquirer can use this data to initiate the steps necessary to cause the issuer to bill the purchaser. In addition, the acquirer will store this information until the payment has been received.
- As noted above, if a cardholder questions a billing entry on his statement, a request for confirmation will be sent by the issuer to the acquirer. At this point, the
processor 50 operated by the acquirer will retrieve the data,concerning the transaction from electronic storage 52 (Figure 1). The digital data can then be converted into human readable form, preferably, a hard copy receipt. This receipt will include all the transaction parameters including a representation of the customer's signature. - There are
many devices 54 available for converting the stored digital data into hard copy receipts. This technology has been developed for various document storage and retrieval systems. This technology has also been used to digitize and store hard copy receipts and generate the receipts for later use. - Once the hard copy receipt has been generated, it can be sent to the customer to validate the transaction. Once the customer is presented with the receipt having his signature, most disputes can be resolved. As can be appreciated, the customer can be provided with a confirming hard copy receipt even if a hard copy receipt was never generated at the point of sale. In this manner, the problems of transfer, cataloguing and storage of such receipts is eliminated.
- While the subject invention has been described with reference to a preferred embodiment, various changes and modifications could be made, by one skilled in the art, without varying from the scope and spirit of the subject invention as defined by the claims. For example, the identifying indicia need not be limited to the signature of the customer as any written code would suffice. In addition, the system could also be used to store and retrieve a PIN entry, providing proof to the customer that the valid PIN was entered.
- The human readable rendition of the receipt would not necessarily have to be a hard copy. For example, if the customer comes into a financial institution connected to the acquirer, the requested information could be electronically retrieved and used to generate a human readable image on a CRT screen where the customer is located. As long as the customer can review the information, the transaction can be validated.
Claims (13)
- A method for validating the authenticity of a transaction comprising the steps of:
generating a digitized code signal at the time of the transaction, said code signal being based on data supplied by the purchaser and uniquely identifying that purchaser;
storing said digitized code signal along with the digitized parameters of the transaction; and
generating a receipt in human readable format, said receipt including the parameters of the transaction and a representation of the data uniquely identifying the purchaser to permit the authenticity of the transaction to be validated. - A method as recited in claim 1 further including the step of transmitting the stored digitized code signal along with the digitized parameters of the transaction to a central processor for storage until such time as a request to generate a receipt is made.
- A method as recited in claim 1 wherein said data uniquely identifying the purchaser is a signature.
- A method as recited in claim 1 wherein said receipt is a hard copy receipt.
- A system for validating the authenticity of a transaction comprising:
terminal means for recording the parameters of the transaction, said terminal means also for recording a digitized code signal based on data supplied by the purchaser and uniquely identifying that purchaser; and
means connectable to said terminal means for generating a receipt in human readable format, said receipt including the parameters of the transaction and a representation of the data uniquely identifying the purchaser to permit the authenticity of the transaction to be validated. - A system as recited in claim 5 wherein said data uniquely identifying the purchaser is a signature.
- A system as recited in claim 5 wherein said receipt is a hard copy receipt.
- A terminal for use in a system for validating the authenticity of a transaction comprising:
means for recording the parameters of the transaction; and
means for recording a digitized code signal based on data supplied by the purchaser and uniquely identifying that purchaser so that a receipt can be generated at a later time, said receipt being in human readable format and including the parameters of the transaction and a representation of the data uniquely identifying the purchaser to permit the authenticity of the transaction to be validated. - A terminal as recited in claim 8 wherein said terminal further includes a means for displaying the transaction parameters at the time of the transaction.
- A terminal as recited in claim 8 wherein said data uniquely identifying the purchaser is a signature.
- A terminal as recited in claim 8 wherein said means for recording the digitized code signals includes a CRT in combination with a light pen.
- A terminal as recited in claim 8 wherein a human readable receipt is also generated at the time of the transaction.
- A terminal as recited in claim 8 wherein said receipt is a hard copy receipt.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US57515990A | 1990-08-29 | 1990-08-29 | |
US575159 | 1990-08-29 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0474360A2 true EP0474360A2 (en) | 1992-03-11 |
EP0474360A3 EP0474360A3 (en) | 1993-07-07 |
Family
ID=24299187
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP19910307072 Withdrawn EP0474360A3 (en) | 1990-08-29 | 1991-08-01 | A system for validating the authenticity of a transaction employing electronic receipts |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0474360A3 (en) |
JP (1) | JPH04256198A (en) |
AU (1) | AU8253391A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2048332A1 (en) |
Cited By (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0632415A1 (en) * | 1993-07-01 | 1995-01-04 | NCR International, Inc. | Document transaction apparatus |
WO1995012843A2 (en) * | 1993-11-05 | 1995-05-11 | Feltscope Limited | Interactive programmable interface for relegendable lcd keyswitches |
US5557518A (en) * | 1994-04-28 | 1996-09-17 | Citibank, N.A. | Trusted agents for open electronic commerce |
US5671280A (en) * | 1995-08-30 | 1997-09-23 | Citibank, N.A. | System and method for commercial payments using trusted agents |
US5745886A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1998-04-28 | Citibank, N.A. | Trusted agents for open distribution of electronic money |
US6088797A (en) * | 1994-04-28 | 2000-07-11 | Rosen; Sholom S. | Tamper-proof electronic processing device |
GB2372961A (en) * | 2001-01-06 | 2002-09-11 | Richard Gerald Enston | Card security system |
DE10122506A1 (en) * | 2001-05-10 | 2002-11-14 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Payment voucher and payment voucher system |
US6487540B1 (en) * | 2000-07-25 | 2002-11-26 | In2M Corporation | Methods and systems for electronic receipt transmission and management |
WO2002023316A3 (en) * | 2000-09-15 | 2003-02-27 | Electronic Business Publishing | Apparatus and method for acquiring information and producing a signed document |
US6898598B2 (en) | 2001-08-09 | 2005-05-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Smart receipt |
US6996546B1 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2006-02-07 | Neopost Inc. | System and methods for digital receipts |
US7028187B1 (en) | 1991-11-15 | 2006-04-11 | Citibank, N.A. | Electronic transaction apparatus for electronic commerce |
US7356477B1 (en) | 2000-09-01 | 2008-04-08 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Frames-based advertising service with response and activity reporting |
US7392396B2 (en) | 2002-03-07 | 2008-06-24 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Transaction device with noise signal encryption |
US7407095B1 (en) | 2000-07-31 | 2008-08-05 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | IPOS transaction terminal |
US9558496B2 (en) | 2013-04-29 | 2017-01-31 | Globalfoundries Inc. | Accessing transaction documents |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AU659448B2 (en) * | 1991-04-09 | 1995-05-18 | Frank Victor Haymann | Preventing unauthorised use of a credit card |
US7058611B2 (en) * | 2000-07-10 | 2006-06-06 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Method and system for conducting secure electronic commerce transactions with authorization request data loop-back |
JP4530576B2 (en) * | 2001-05-11 | 2010-08-25 | トッパン・フォームズ株式会社 | Index file creation system and index file creation method for electronic document |
Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2312984A1 (en) * | 1972-03-24 | 1973-09-27 | Gao Ges Automation Org | PROCEDURE FOR THE AUTOMATIC ISSUE OF A RECEIPT |
US4064389A (en) * | 1976-06-23 | 1977-12-20 | Rca Corporation | System and method for authenticating an electronically transmitted document |
DE2759196A1 (en) * | 1977-07-18 | 1979-02-01 | Transaction Management Inc | Data terminal with process defining data input keyboard - includes recording medium, subscriber block, and remote computer interface |
GB2073661A (en) * | 1980-04-11 | 1981-10-21 | Transaction Technology Inc | Apparatus and method for personalizing checks |
WO1982003485A1 (en) * | 1981-04-02 | 1982-10-14 | Ncr Co | Check issuing terminal and method for issuing checks therefrom |
EP0156509A1 (en) * | 1984-02-24 | 1985-10-02 | The De La Rue Company Plc | Sign verification |
US4656662A (en) * | 1983-07-18 | 1987-04-07 | Ncr Corporation | Personal identification method and apparatus |
US4843220A (en) * | 1987-03-13 | 1989-06-27 | American Magnetics Corporation | Automatic data capture for multiple form point of sale slip packs |
WO1991010207A1 (en) * | 1990-01-04 | 1991-07-11 | Teknekron Communications Systems, Inc. | A method and an apparatus for electronically processing a transaction with a human signature |
EP0473358A2 (en) * | 1990-08-30 | 1992-03-04 | NCR International, Inc. | System for processing customer transactions |
-
1991
- 1991-08-01 CA CA002048332A patent/CA2048332A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1991-08-01 EP EP19910307072 patent/EP0474360A3/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1991-08-16 AU AU82533/91A patent/AU8253391A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1991-08-29 JP JP3244727A patent/JPH04256198A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2312984A1 (en) * | 1972-03-24 | 1973-09-27 | Gao Ges Automation Org | PROCEDURE FOR THE AUTOMATIC ISSUE OF A RECEIPT |
US4064389A (en) * | 1976-06-23 | 1977-12-20 | Rca Corporation | System and method for authenticating an electronically transmitted document |
DE2759196A1 (en) * | 1977-07-18 | 1979-02-01 | Transaction Management Inc | Data terminal with process defining data input keyboard - includes recording medium, subscriber block, and remote computer interface |
GB2073661A (en) * | 1980-04-11 | 1981-10-21 | Transaction Technology Inc | Apparatus and method for personalizing checks |
WO1982003485A1 (en) * | 1981-04-02 | 1982-10-14 | Ncr Co | Check issuing terminal and method for issuing checks therefrom |
US4656662A (en) * | 1983-07-18 | 1987-04-07 | Ncr Corporation | Personal identification method and apparatus |
EP0156509A1 (en) * | 1984-02-24 | 1985-10-02 | The De La Rue Company Plc | Sign verification |
US4843220A (en) * | 1987-03-13 | 1989-06-27 | American Magnetics Corporation | Automatic data capture for multiple form point of sale slip packs |
WO1991010207A1 (en) * | 1990-01-04 | 1991-07-11 | Teknekron Communications Systems, Inc. | A method and an apparatus for electronically processing a transaction with a human signature |
EP0473358A2 (en) * | 1990-08-30 | 1992-03-04 | NCR International, Inc. | System for processing customer transactions |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
IBM TECHNICAL DISCLOSURE BULLETIN vol. 31, no. 7, December 1988, NEW YORK, US pages 441 - 442 'PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION TERMINAL' * |
Cited By (29)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7028187B1 (en) | 1991-11-15 | 2006-04-11 | Citibank, N.A. | Electronic transaction apparatus for electronic commerce |
EP0632415A1 (en) * | 1993-07-01 | 1995-01-04 | NCR International, Inc. | Document transaction apparatus |
US5751842A (en) * | 1993-07-01 | 1998-05-12 | Ncr Corporation | Document transaction apparatus |
WO1995012843A2 (en) * | 1993-11-05 | 1995-05-11 | Feltscope Limited | Interactive programmable interface for relegendable lcd keyswitches |
WO1995012843A3 (en) * | 1993-11-05 | 1995-08-17 | Feltscope Ltd | Interactive programmable interface for relegendable lcd keyswitches |
US5703949A (en) * | 1994-04-28 | 1997-12-30 | Citibank, N.A. | Method for establishing secure communications among processing devices |
US5557518A (en) * | 1994-04-28 | 1996-09-17 | Citibank, N.A. | Trusted agents for open electronic commerce |
US5642419A (en) * | 1994-04-28 | 1997-06-24 | Citibank N.A. | Method for acquiring and revalidating an electronic credential |
US7478239B1 (en) | 1994-04-28 | 2009-01-13 | Citibank, N.A. | Electronic ticket vending system |
US5621797A (en) * | 1994-04-28 | 1997-04-15 | Citibank, N.A. | Electronic ticket presentation and transfer method |
US5878139A (en) * | 1994-04-28 | 1999-03-02 | Citibank, N.A. | Method for electronic merchandise dispute resolution |
US6088797A (en) * | 1994-04-28 | 2000-07-11 | Rosen; Sholom S. | Tamper-proof electronic processing device |
US6175921B1 (en) | 1994-04-28 | 2001-01-16 | Citibank, N.A. | Tamper-proof devices for unique identification |
US6336095B1 (en) | 1994-04-28 | 2002-01-01 | Citibank, N.A. | Method for electronic merchandise dispute resolution |
US5745886A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1998-04-28 | Citibank, N.A. | Trusted agents for open distribution of electronic money |
US5671280A (en) * | 1995-08-30 | 1997-09-23 | Citibank, N.A. | System and method for commercial payments using trusted agents |
US6487540B1 (en) * | 2000-07-25 | 2002-11-26 | In2M Corporation | Methods and systems for electronic receipt transmission and management |
US7866553B2 (en) | 2000-07-31 | 2011-01-11 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | IPOS transaction terminal |
US7407095B1 (en) | 2000-07-31 | 2008-08-05 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | IPOS transaction terminal |
US7734475B2 (en) | 2000-09-01 | 2010-06-08 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Frames-based advertising service with response and activity reporting |
US7356477B1 (en) | 2000-09-01 | 2008-04-08 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Frames-based advertising service with response and activity reporting |
WO2002023316A3 (en) * | 2000-09-15 | 2003-02-27 | Electronic Business Publishing | Apparatus and method for acquiring information and producing a signed document |
GB2372961B (en) * | 2001-01-06 | 2004-09-01 | Richard Gerald Enston | Automated teller machine card security system |
GB2372961A (en) * | 2001-01-06 | 2002-09-11 | Richard Gerald Enston | Card security system |
DE10122506A1 (en) * | 2001-05-10 | 2002-11-14 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Payment voucher and payment voucher system |
US6898598B2 (en) | 2001-08-09 | 2005-05-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Smart receipt |
US6996546B1 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2006-02-07 | Neopost Inc. | System and methods for digital receipts |
US7392396B2 (en) | 2002-03-07 | 2008-06-24 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Transaction device with noise signal encryption |
US9558496B2 (en) | 2013-04-29 | 2017-01-31 | Globalfoundries Inc. | Accessing transaction documents |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU8253391A (en) | 1992-03-12 |
CA2048332A1 (en) | 1992-03-01 |
JPH04256198A (en) | 1992-09-10 |
EP0474360A3 (en) | 1993-07-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0474360A2 (en) | A system for validating the authenticity of a transaction employing electronic receipts | |
US5195133A (en) | Apparatus and method for producing a digitized transaction record including an encrypted signature | |
US6397194B1 (en) | Receipt scanning system and method | |
US5023782A (en) | Travelers cheque transaction terminal | |
US6644546B2 (en) | System and method for electronic check conversion at a point-of-sale terminal | |
US6202055B1 (en) | Positive identification display device and scanner for low cost collection and display of graphic and text data in a secure manner | |
US5892824A (en) | Signature capture/verification systems and methods | |
US5832464A (en) | System and method for efficiently processing payments via check and electronic funds transfer | |
EP0473358B1 (en) | System for processing customer transactions | |
US6816608B2 (en) | Storing information recorded as part of a financial transaction with a quantity of data stored determined by a monetary value of the transaction | |
US20040193538A1 (en) | Receipt processing system and method | |
US20020147600A1 (en) | System and method for implementing financial transactions using biometric keyed data | |
US20040111371A1 (en) | Methods and systems for check processing | |
US20060193004A1 (en) | Method of integrating imaging products/services with non-imaging products/services in a single kiosk | |
US20040122754A1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for processing check transactions in self service customer checkout terminals | |
US20040044606A1 (en) | Methods and systems for check processing | |
US20030033252A1 (en) | Methods and systems for check processing using blank checks at a point-of-sale | |
US20110196753A1 (en) | System and method for immediate issuance of an activated prepaid card with improved security measures | |
US20020026365A1 (en) | Method and system for electronic payment and check guarantee | |
CN1141456A (en) | Method and apparatus for image-based calidations of printed documents | |
EP0517405A2 (en) | Signature verification method | |
US8616440B2 (en) | Alternative banking system for managing traditional and nontraditional markets | |
KR20090084813A (en) | A method and system for managing purchase transactions between a customer and a merchant | |
US20150046334A1 (en) | System and method for issuing prepaid negotiable instruments | |
US6223169B1 (en) | Electronic transaction processing system with escrow card |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 19940301 |