CA1185370A - Sheet-material authenticated item with reflective- diffractive authenticating device - Google Patents
Sheet-material authenticated item with reflective- diffractive authenticating deviceInfo
- Publication number
- CA1185370A CA1185370A CA000396399A CA396399A CA1185370A CA 1185370 A CA1185370 A CA 1185370A CA 000396399 A CA000396399 A CA 000396399A CA 396399 A CA396399 A CA 396399A CA 1185370 A CA1185370 A CA 1185370A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- grating
- color
- transparent material
- substrate
- diffraction
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 21
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 45
- 239000012780 transparent material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 37
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 claims description 21
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000002745 absorbent Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000002250 absorbent Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 claims 3
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 7
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 22
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 21
- 239000003989 dielectric material Substances 0.000 description 8
- 239000000853 adhesive Substances 0.000 description 7
- 230000001070 adhesive effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000010030 laminating Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000003475 lamination Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000001771 vacuum deposition Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000000151 deposition Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008020 evaporation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001704 evaporation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000178 monomer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002985 plastic film Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000004800 polyvinyl chloride Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920000915 polyvinyl chloride Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000004416 thermosoftening plastic Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000001429 visible spectrum Methods 0.000 description 2
- UPLPHRJJTCUQAY-WIRWPRASSA-N 2,3-thioepoxy madol Chemical compound C([C@@H]1CC2)[C@@H]3S[C@@H]3C[C@]1(C)[C@@H]1[C@@H]2[C@@H]2CC[C@](C)(O)[C@@]2(C)CC1 UPLPHRJJTCUQAY-WIRWPRASSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000000748 compression moulding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005112 continuous flow technique Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004049 embossing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004313 glare Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005286 illumination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000976 ink Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002650 laminated plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001465 metallisation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010287 polarization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920000515 polycarbonate Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004417 polycarbonate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920000728 polyester Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000002285 radioactive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004544 sputter deposition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920001169 thermoplastic Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B42—BOOKBINDING; ALBUMS; FILES; SPECIAL PRINTED MATTER
- B42D—BOOKS; BOOK COVERS; LOOSE LEAVES; PRINTED MATTER CHARACTERISED BY IDENTIFICATION OR SECURITY FEATURES; PRINTED MATTER OF SPECIAL FORMAT OR STYLE NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; DEVICES FOR USE THEREWITH AND NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; MOVABLE-STRIP WRITING OR READING APPARATUS
- B42D25/00—Information-bearing cards or sheet-like structures characterised by identification or security features; Manufacture thereof
- B42D25/30—Identification or security features, e.g. for preventing forgery
- B42D25/328—Diffraction gratings; Holograms
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B42—BOOKBINDING; ALBUMS; FILES; SPECIAL PRINTED MATTER
- B42D—BOOKS; BOOK COVERS; LOOSE LEAVES; PRINTED MATTER CHARACTERISED BY IDENTIFICATION OR SECURITY FEATURES; PRINTED MATTER OF SPECIAL FORMAT OR STYLE NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; DEVICES FOR USE THEREWITH AND NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; MOVABLE-STRIP WRITING OR READING APPARATUS
- B42D25/00—Information-bearing cards or sheet-like structures characterised by identification or security features; Manufacture thereof
- B42D25/30—Identification or security features, e.g. for preventing forgery
- B42D25/324—Reliefs
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G02—OPTICS
- G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
- G02B5/00—Optical elements other than lenses
- G02B5/18—Diffraction gratings
- G02B5/1842—Gratings for image generation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06K—GRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
- G06K19/00—Record carriers for use with machines and with at least a part designed to carry digital markings
- G06K19/06—Record carriers for use with machines and with at least a part designed to carry digital markings characterised by the kind of the digital marking, e.g. shape, nature, code
- G06K19/08—Record carriers for use with machines and with at least a part designed to carry digital markings characterised by the kind of the digital marking, e.g. shape, nature, code using markings of different kinds or more than one marking of the same kind in the same record carrier, e.g. one marking being sensed by optical and the other by magnetic means
- G06K19/10—Record carriers for use with machines and with at least a part designed to carry digital markings characterised by the kind of the digital marking, e.g. shape, nature, code using markings of different kinds or more than one marking of the same kind in the same record carrier, e.g. one marking being sensed by optical and the other by magnetic means at least one kind of marking being used for authentication, e.g. of credit or identity cards
- G06K19/16—Record carriers for use with machines and with at least a part designed to carry digital markings characterised by the kind of the digital marking, e.g. shape, nature, code using markings of different kinds or more than one marking of the same kind in the same record carrier, e.g. one marking being sensed by optical and the other by magnetic means at least one kind of marking being used for authentication, e.g. of credit or identity cards the marking being a hologram or diffraction grating
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
- G07D7/00—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
- G07D7/06—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency using wave or particle radiation
- G07D7/12—Visible light, infrared or ultraviolet radiation
-
- B42D2033/04—
-
- B42D2033/20—
-
- B42D2035/02—
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B42—BOOKBINDING; ALBUMS; FILES; SPECIAL PRINTED MATTER
- B42D—BOOKS; BOOK COVERS; LOOSE LEAVES; PRINTED MATTER CHARACTERISED BY IDENTIFICATION OR SECURITY FEATURES; PRINTED MATTER OF SPECIAL FORMAT OR STYLE NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; DEVICES FOR USE THEREWITH AND NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; MOVABLE-STRIP WRITING OR READING APPARATUS
- B42D25/00—Information-bearing cards or sheet-like structures characterised by identification or security features; Manufacture thereof
- B42D25/20—Information-bearing cards or sheet-like structures characterised by identification or security features; Manufacture thereof characterised by a particular use or purpose
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S428/00—Stock material or miscellaneous articles
- Y10S428/916—Fraud or tamper detecting
Abstract
SHEET-MATERIAL AUTHENTICATED ITEM
WITH DIFFRACTIVE-SUBTRACTIVE
AUTHENTICATING DEVICE
Abstract An improved authenticating device comprises a substrate bonded to the sheet material, the substrate having a reflective diffractive structure formed as a relief pattern on a viewable surface thereof, and a transparent material covering the structure. Specified grating parameters of the diffractive structure, obtainable at low cost, result in peculiar, but easily discernable, optical color properties that cannot be copied by color copying machines.
WITH DIFFRACTIVE-SUBTRACTIVE
AUTHENTICATING DEVICE
Abstract An improved authenticating device comprises a substrate bonded to the sheet material, the substrate having a reflective diffractive structure formed as a relief pattern on a viewable surface thereof, and a transparent material covering the structure. Specified grating parameters of the diffractive structure, obtainable at low cost, result in peculiar, but easily discernable, optical color properties that cannot be copied by color copying machines.
Description
353~
RCA 75,742 SHEET-MATERIAL AUTHENTICATED IT~M
WITH R~FLECTIVE-DIFFRACTIVE
AUTHENTICATING DEVICE
This invention relates to devices for authenticating various items of sheet materials which are subject to counterfeiting, such as bank notes and other valuable documents, credit cards, passports, security passes, and phonograph records or their covers, for example.
~ ecently, there have been great advances in photocopying machines for the color copying of documents.
It is believed that these advances will continue.
Therefore, in the near future, it is likely that it will be possible to make a color photocopy of a bank note that the man-in-the-street is incapable of (or, at least, will have great difficulty in) distinguishing from the original. More particularly, while it is true that a genuine bank note makes use of authenticating means (such as inks of many colors and intricate engraved designs on special paper which sometimes contain water-mar~ks or embedded colored platelets or metal threads) which currently permit an expert to distinguish a counterfeit from a genuine bank note, the unsophisticated layman is in no position to make use of such authenticating means. Therefore, as color photocopying improves, a real danger exists that the man-in-the-street will lose faith in the genuineness of paper currency. Such a situation could create havoc.
In order to be practical, any authenticating device for solving this problem must, inter alia, meet all four of the following criteria:
3~ 1. The authenticating device must produce an effect which is not capable of being reproduced by any type of color copier.
q~.
3~
1 2 RCA 75,7~2
RCA 75,742 SHEET-MATERIAL AUTHENTICATED IT~M
WITH R~FLECTIVE-DIFFRACTIVE
AUTHENTICATING DEVICE
This invention relates to devices for authenticating various items of sheet materials which are subject to counterfeiting, such as bank notes and other valuable documents, credit cards, passports, security passes, and phonograph records or their covers, for example.
~ ecently, there have been great advances in photocopying machines for the color copying of documents.
It is believed that these advances will continue.
Therefore, in the near future, it is likely that it will be possible to make a color photocopy of a bank note that the man-in-the-street is incapable of (or, at least, will have great difficulty in) distinguishing from the original. More particularly, while it is true that a genuine bank note makes use of authenticating means (such as inks of many colors and intricate engraved designs on special paper which sometimes contain water-mar~ks or embedded colored platelets or metal threads) which currently permit an expert to distinguish a counterfeit from a genuine bank note, the unsophisticated layman is in no position to make use of such authenticating means. Therefore, as color photocopying improves, a real danger exists that the man-in-the-street will lose faith in the genuineness of paper currency. Such a situation could create havoc.
In order to be practical, any authenticating device for solving this problem must, inter alia, meet all four of the following criteria:
3~ 1. The authenticating device must produce an effect which is not capable of being reproduced by any type of color copier.
q~.
3~
1 2 RCA 75,7~2
2. The effect produced by the authenticatiny device must be quickly and readily discernable, under ordinary lighting conditions, without requiring any significant degree of skill on the part of an unsophis-ticated layman.
3. The sophistication and capital cost of the equipment required to fabricate an authenticating device and to securely attach the authenticating device to an authenticated item (e.g., bank note, etc.) must be high enough to be beyond the reach o~ would-be counterfeiters.
4. Under high volume conditions, the additional per-unit cost of fabricating an authenticating device and securely attaching it to the authenticated item (including both the amortization of the high capital cost of the equipment, as well as the per-unit variable cost) must be low enough not to constitute an impediment to its use.
Reference is made to U.S. Patent 4,186,943, 20 which issued February 5, 1980, -to Lee, and to British Patent 1,394,021, which issued May 14, 1975. Each of these patents is concerned wlth an authenticating device for items such as bank notes. The authenticating devices disclosed in these patents fulfill the first three of the above criteria, but not the fourth criterion.
More specifically, the authenticating devices disclosed in these patents are comprised of a plastic strip or sheet substrate coated with a sufficient number of separate overlaying layers of quarter~wave (at a specified 30 wavelength within the visible spectrum) films of dielectric materials to operate effectly as a transmissive-reflective color filter. Such a color filter, when illuminated by polychromatic (e.g., white) light, selectively reflects most of the light in a certain portion of the visible 35 spectrum and selectively transmits most of the light in the remaining portion of the visible spectrum. Thus, the color of the reflective light and the color of the transmitted light are different from each other. By properly specifying the value of the wavelength of the 40 quarter-wave dielectric films, the respective colors of ~S3~70 1 3 RCA 75,742 the reflected and transmitted light may be made substantially complementary (and, therefore, very ~uickly and readily distinguishable from each other by an
Reference is made to U.S. Patent 4,186,943, 20 which issued February 5, 1980, -to Lee, and to British Patent 1,394,021, which issued May 14, 1975. Each of these patents is concerned wlth an authenticating device for items such as bank notes. The authenticating devices disclosed in these patents fulfill the first three of the above criteria, but not the fourth criterion.
More specifically, the authenticating devices disclosed in these patents are comprised of a plastic strip or sheet substrate coated with a sufficient number of separate overlaying layers of quarter~wave (at a specified 30 wavelength within the visible spectrum) films of dielectric materials to operate effectly as a transmissive-reflective color filter. Such a color filter, when illuminated by polychromatic (e.g., white) light, selectively reflects most of the light in a certain portion of the visible 35 spectrum and selectively transmits most of the light in the remaining portion of the visible spectrum. Thus, the color of the reflective light and the color of the transmitted light are different from each other. By properly specifying the value of the wavelength of the 40 quarter-wave dielectric films, the respective colors of ~S3~70 1 3 RCA 75,742 the reflected and transmitted light may be made substantially complementary (and, therefore, very ~uickly and readily distinguishable from each other by an
5 unskilled person). Further, the spectral portion (color) of reflected light from such a device which is observed depends on the angle at which it is illuminated and viewed. Therefore, the observed color of this portion changes as the device is tilted in relation to the direction of the illuminating light. This change in observed color with angle also may be used to provide a change between two cornplementary reflected colors with a change in viewing angle.
While such an authenticating device works well for a bank note or the like, its per-unit cost of fabrication is inherently quite high. The reason for this is that each of the multi-layers of dielectric film is comprised of a different dielectric material having a different index-of-refraction. Each of these layers 20 must be successively and separately laid down (by such means as evaporation or sputtering deposition in a vacuum) with great accuracy to insure that the thickness of each particular dielectric material is equal to one-quarter of the specified wavelength of visible light 25 traveling through that particular dielectric material ~i.e., having the index-of-refraction of that particular dielectric material). The cost of such successive and separate laying down is not a one-time capital cost, which can be amortized over a high volume of bank notes, 30 but is part of the per-unit variable cost that applies to each and every authenticating device.
Reference is made to U.S. Patent 4,033,05g, which issued July 5, 1977, to Hutton et al., and to U.S. Patent 4,124,947, which issued November 14, 1978, 35 to Kuhl et al. Each of these patents discloses an authenticating device comprised of an imprint of intaglio pattern elements on a substrate. The intaglio pattern elements are in the form of one or more fields of closely juxtaposed, non-intersecting and non-contacting, lengthwise-extending mounds or peaks. The reflected !
' ~85;3'713 -~- RCA 75,742 color of the mounds contras-ts in luminance with that of the substrate (i.e., one has a relatively light reflective color and the o-ther has a relatively dark reflective color). However, as long as -the authen~icating device is viewe~ from an angle such that both the mounds, themselves, and the intervening substrate spaces between adjacent mounds are within the line of sight of a viewer, the luminance of the observed reflected color is an integration of that of the mound reflec-ted color and the substrate reflected color. The color hue of the integrated observed reflec-ted color turns out to be fairly close to that of the mounds color, although the satura-tion of the integrated observed reflec-ted color is substantially different from that of the mounds' color.
On the o-ther hand, when the mounds are viewed within a band of angular orientations, with respect to the subs-tra-te, such that the presence of the mounds occlude the intervening spaces between adjacent mounds, the observed color is solely that of the mounds/ -themselves, (which contrasts in luminance with the aforesaid integrated color). In the case of Kuhl et al., when the mounds are viewed within such a band, one or more very thin lines, which extend in a direction substantially perpendicular to the lengthwise extending mounds and have the color of the substrate, become observable in contrast to the mound color background. These -thin lines are achieved by breaking each leng-thwise extending mound into the same given set of two or more sligh-tly spaced longitudi.nal segments, the corresponding spaces between longitudinal segments of adjacent mounds being aligned with one another. Thereby, the above~men-tioned observable thin lines appear when viewed within such a shallow (in a plane perpendicular to -the surface of the substrate), extremely narrow (in a plane parallel to the surface of the substrate) band of angular orienta-tions, because the mound segments then occlude the relatively wider spaces of substrate color between adjacent ~ount segments.
fn any case, the band of angular orientations is defined by such factors as the height of the mounds, i353~
1 5 RCA 75,742 the size of the intervening spaces between adjacent mounds, the angular orientation of the lengthwise extending mounds with respect to the line of sight of the viewer~
While such an authenticating device works well for a bank note or the like, its per-unit cost of fabrication is inherently quite high. The reason for this is that each of the multi-layers of dielectric film is comprised of a different dielectric material having a different index-of-refraction. Each of these layers 20 must be successively and separately laid down (by such means as evaporation or sputtering deposition in a vacuum) with great accuracy to insure that the thickness of each particular dielectric material is equal to one-quarter of the specified wavelength of visible light 25 traveling through that particular dielectric material ~i.e., having the index-of-refraction of that particular dielectric material). The cost of such successive and separate laying down is not a one-time capital cost, which can be amortized over a high volume of bank notes, 30 but is part of the per-unit variable cost that applies to each and every authenticating device.
Reference is made to U.S. Patent 4,033,05g, which issued July 5, 1977, to Hutton et al., and to U.S. Patent 4,124,947, which issued November 14, 1978, 35 to Kuhl et al. Each of these patents discloses an authenticating device comprised of an imprint of intaglio pattern elements on a substrate. The intaglio pattern elements are in the form of one or more fields of closely juxtaposed, non-intersecting and non-contacting, lengthwise-extending mounds or peaks. The reflected !
' ~85;3'713 -~- RCA 75,742 color of the mounds contras-ts in luminance with that of the substrate (i.e., one has a relatively light reflective color and the o-ther has a relatively dark reflective color). However, as long as -the authen~icating device is viewe~ from an angle such that both the mounds, themselves, and the intervening substrate spaces between adjacent mounds are within the line of sight of a viewer, the luminance of the observed reflected color is an integration of that of the mound reflec-ted color and the substrate reflected color. The color hue of the integrated observed reflec-ted color turns out to be fairly close to that of the mounds color, although the satura-tion of the integrated observed reflec-ted color is substantially different from that of the mounds' color.
On the o-ther hand, when the mounds are viewed within a band of angular orientations, with respect to the subs-tra-te, such that the presence of the mounds occlude the intervening spaces between adjacent mounds, the observed color is solely that of the mounds/ -themselves, (which contrasts in luminance with the aforesaid integrated color). In the case of Kuhl et al., when the mounds are viewed within such a band, one or more very thin lines, which extend in a direction substantially perpendicular to the lengthwise extending mounds and have the color of the substrate, become observable in contrast to the mound color background. These -thin lines are achieved by breaking each leng-thwise extending mound into the same given set of two or more sligh-tly spaced longitudi.nal segments, the corresponding spaces between longitudinal segments of adjacent mounds being aligned with one another. Thereby, the above~men-tioned observable thin lines appear when viewed within such a shallow (in a plane perpendicular to -the surface of the substrate), extremely narrow (in a plane parallel to the surface of the substrate) band of angular orienta-tions, because the mound segments then occlude the relatively wider spaces of substrate color between adjacent ~ount segments.
fn any case, the band of angular orientations is defined by such factors as the height of the mounds, i353~
1 5 RCA 75,742 the size of the intervening spaces between adjacent mounds, the angular orientation of the lengthwise extending mounds with respect to the line of sight of the viewer~
6 the shape of the mounds and the relative location of different angularly-oriented fields of mounds with respect to one another. A ~Icontrast~ image (formed by appropriately changing the values of one or more of these parameters for the image with respect to those of the 10 background), which image is incapable of being discerned from the background when viewed at most angular orientations, becomes discernable (by contrast with the background) when viewed from angular orientations within this band.
On a relative basis, the per-unit cost of an intaglio-imprinted indicating device is substantially lower than that of a transmissive-reflective color filter authenticating device, discussed above. However, on an absolute basis, the per-unit cost of an intaglio-imprinted 20 authenticating device is still somewhat too high to satisfy the fourth criterion, set forth above. Eurther-more, the intaglio-imprinted authenticating device is much less effective than is the transmissive-reflective color filter authenticating device in meeting the 25 requirements of the second criterion, discussed above.
It takes very little skill on the part of an unsophisticated layman to readily and quickly observe a change in complementary colors (each of which is observable over a relatively large but different angular orientation) 30 when a transmissive-reflective color filter authenticating device is observed at different angles or, alternatively, observed, respectively, in reflected or transmitted light. However, in the case of an intaglio-imprinted authenticating device, an image is observed by either 35 a cnange of contrast in luminance, with respect to that of the background, when the authenticating device is viewed from within a certain prescribed band of angular orientations or, in the case of Kuhl et al., by the appearance of a very thin line of contrasting color 40 when viewed within a certain e~tremelv narrow and also i3~
1 6 RCA 75,7~2 shallow band of angular orientations. In either case, it inherently takes a significant amount of time, as well as some skill, for a viewer to orient properly the intaglio-imprinted authenticating device to reveal the '1contrast" image thereon. While this significant amount of time may not be an impediment to the use of an intaylio-imprint authenticating device on such an authenticated item as a stock certificate, which can be observed relatively slowly, it is an impedim~nt to its use on a bank note or the like, which must be observed quickly by an unskilled layman (such as a cashier in a store or in a box office, by way of example).
The present invention is directed to an authenticating device which meets all of the above set forth four criteria. In the present invention an authenticating device comprises a dif~ractive phase structure embossed or cast on the surface of a substrate, which forms a special type of color filter. In principle, such a filter may be either a transmissive filter or a reflective filter. However, for reasons described in more detail below, a reflective filter is much more practical for use in an authenticating device. An authenticating device încorporating the present invention may make use of the teachings of one or more of U.S.
Patent 3,957~354, which issued to Knop on May 18, 1976;
IJ.S. Patent 3,961,836, which issued to Xnop on June 8, 1976, and U.S. Patent ~,062,628, which issued to Gale on December 13, 1977~
More specifically, an authenticating device incorporating the present invention includes a substrate bonded to the sheet material of which an authenticated item subject to counterfeiting is comprised. The substrate has a predetermined reflective diffraction grating structure formed as a relief pattern that is situated on at least one region of a viewable surface of the substrate. The reflective diffraction grating structure is filled and co~ered with a transparent 53~
1 7 RC~ 75,742 material which exhibits a given index-of-refraction.
The relief pattern forming the structure has specified grating profile, physical amplitude, and line frequency 5 parameters, such that the structure operates to separate polychromatic illuminating light inciden-t thereon into at least one pair of adjacent, separate and distinct, reflective beams of contrasting colors, in which the narrowest angular dimension of the beam-width of each 10 of the beams at a distance of thirty centimeters is at least two milliradians. The transparent material is bonded to the viewable surface of the substrate in a manner sufficiently secure to prevent the transparent material from being removed from the structure without 15 effectively destroying the structure. As used herein, the expression "adjacent, separate and distinct, reflective beams of contrasting colors" is meant to exclude the case of adjacent and contiguous color portions of the continuous spectrum of visible polychromatic (e.g., so-called "white") light, since such adjacent portions are neither "separate and distinct" from each other nor do they have colors which are 'Icontrasting''.
In the drawings:
FIG. l is a schematic diagram of a first 25 embodiment of an authenticated item having an authenticating device, comprised of single integrated structure, bonded thereto;
FIG. la is a schematic diagram of a second embodiment of an authenticated item having an 30 authenticating device, comprised of a plurality oE spaced integra-ted structures, bonded thereto.
FIGS. 2a and 2b schematically illustrate first and second embodiments of an integrated structure of the type employed by the authenticating devices of 35 FIGS. l and la;
FIGS. 3 and 3a schematically illustrate one species of an authenticating device integrated structure, in which an integrated structure is comprised of a single region diffraction grating structure, and FIGS. 4, 4a, and 4b schematically illustrate 31 ~L8~3~7~
-8- RCA 75,742 other species of an authen-ticating device integra-ted structure in which an integrated structure is comprised of a plurality of contiguous differen-t diffraction grating regions.
Referring to FIG. 1, there is shown authenticated item 100 comprised of a shee-t material, such as plas-tic or paper. In describing the presen-t invention, for illustrative purposes, i-t often will be assumed tha-t au-thenticated i-tem 100 is a bank note.
However, it should be understood that authentica-ted item 100 may take other forms, such as other types of valuable documents, having intrinsic value: cr*dit cards, passports, security passes, or phonograph records or covers therefor, by way of examples. In any case, authenticated item 100 has bonded thereto authenticatin~
device 102. Au-thenticating device 102 consists of a single integrated structure of the type shown in either FIGS. 2a or 2b. In FIG. la, authenticating device 102a consists of two (or more~ spaced integrated structures, each of the type shown in either FIGS. 2a or 2b.
As indicated in FIGS. 2a and 2b, integra-ted structure 201a or 201b, comprising authen-ticating device 102 or 102a, includes substrate 200 having a bottom surface 202 that is bonded to authenticated item 100 and a top surface 204 having a predetermined reflective dif~raction grating structure 206 formed thereon.
Transparent material 208 fills and covers reflec-tive diffraction grating structure 206. Further, -transparent material 20~ exhibits a given index-of-refraction larger than unity. Transparen-t ma-terial 208 is preferably a plastic material, such as polyvinylchloride ~PVC) or polycarbonate polyester, by way of example. (The index-of refraction of such materials is nominally about 1.5).
While substrate 200 may be comprised of metal, it is preferably also comprised of a plastic or an adhesive material.
In the case of in-tegra-ted-structure embodiment 201a, shown in FIG. 2a substrate 200 may be formed from a thermoplas-tic shee-t having diffractive structure 206 53~t 1 9 RCA 75,742 embossed or cast on surface 204 thereof. Structure 206 may be made reflective by vacuum (e.g., evaporation or sputterin~) deposition of a thin metal (e.g., aluminum) film. Transparent material 208 may then be added by laminating a plastic layer to surface 204 or, alternatively, by applying a coating of a plastic monomer or plastic solution which is thereafter cured into a solid layer.
In this case, transparent material 208 and substrate 200 10 may be made of either the same or different plas~ics.
In the case of integrated-structure embodiment 201b, shown in FIG. 2b, transparent material 208 comprises the original plastic sheet in which the diffraction grating structure 206 is embossed or cast, and substrate 200 may comprise a laminated plastic layer or either a plastic monomer or plastic solution that is later cured into a thin plastic layer. Alternatively, substrate 200 r in the case of integrated-structure 201b, may be comprised of the adhesive material that bonds its bottom surface to authenticated item 100. In other respects, the embodiments of FIGS. 2a and 2b are substantially similar.
In both the embodiments of FIGS. 2a and 2b, the combined thickness of substrate 200 and transparent 25 material 208 is t. As indicated by the arrow, the viewable surface of the reflective diffraction grating structure 206 is illuminated from above, through transparent material 208, by polychromatic light illumination 210. The grating structure 206 reflects the polychromatic illuminating light incident thereon, in manner determined by its physical amplitude A, its linesfrequency d and the spatial waveform or shape of its periodic grating profile. In accordance with the principles of the present invention, structure 206 35 has specified grating profile, physical amplitude A
and line frequency d parameters, such that structure 206 is operative to separate polychromatic illuminating light 210 incident thereon into at least one pair of adjacent, separate and distinct, reflected beam of contrasting colors, wherein the size of the narrowest 3'7~
1 10 RCA 75,742 angular dimension of the beam width of each of the beams at a distance of 30 cm is at least 2 milliradians.
Examples of reflective diffraction gratings structures 5 having such specified grating profile, physical amp]itude and line Erequency parameters are discussed in more detail below in connection with FIGS . 3 and 4.
It is often important that the overall thickness t of the integrated-structure forming authentica-ting 10 device 102 or 102a be quite small. For instance, in stacking bank notes in a stack of a predetermined number of bills, an angular tilt occurs which has a value dependent upon the product of the thickness t and the number of bills in the stack. In principle, the sheet 15 material could include a declivity or recess having a depth equal to t for receiving the authenticating device.
However, this adds to the cost. It is simpler and cheaper to maintain the maximum angular tilt low enough to prevent any bill from slipping off the stack, which is the case when the thickness t is maintained less than 0.0005 mils (i.e., about 12.5 ~m). However, to maintain sufficient strength to prevent tearing of an integrated structure having such a small overall thickness t, the physical amplitude A should be maintained as small as possible. Further, the speed at which a diffractive structure having a relatively small ratio of physical amplitude A to line spacing d can be embossed (by compression molding of a thermoplastic sheet) is much faster (and, therefore, provides a significant reduction in variable unit cost) than is the case when this ratio is large. This is another reason why the physical amplitude A should be made as small as possible.
A diffraction grating, whether reflective or 35 transmissive, formed by a surface relief pattern is a phase grating. The optical effect produced by a phase grating depends on the value of its optical amplitude a, measured in free space wavelengths ~, rather than directly on the value of its physical amplitude A.
40 However, the optical amplitude a is proportional to the ~53~
1 11 RCA 75,742 physical amplitude A, although the constant of proportionali~y differs significantly between transmissive and reflective gratings. Specifically, for a transmissive grating, the constant of proportionality is l/(nl - n), where n is the index-of-refraction of transparen-t material 20g and nl is the index-of-refraction of a transparent substrate corresponding to substrate 200.
Dielectric materials of the type (such as plastic or adhesive) that are practical for fabricating integrated structure 201a or 201b have indices-of-refraction which do not differ much from one to another. Therefore, although the index~of-refraction of such dielectric materials is high relative to unity (e.g., in the 15 vicinity of 1.5), the difference in indices-of-refraction (nl - n) of any two of such dielectric materials is small relative to unity, resulting in a large constant of proportionality l/(nl - n) for a transmissive grating.
This renders the physical amplitude A of a transmissive 20 grating quite large relative to its optical amplitude _. On the other hand, the constant of proportionality for a reflective grating is l/2n, which is much smaller than unity, since n is larger than unity. This renders the physical amplitude A of a reflective grating quite small relative to its optical amplitude a. As discussed above, there are significant benefits to be had by maintaining pysical amplitude A relatively small. It is for this reason that reflective diffraction gratings, rather than transmissive diffraction gratings, 30 are employed in the authenticating devices of the present invention.
Further, the fabrication of the integrated structures 201a and 201b,FIGS. 2a and 2b,lend themselves to continuous-flow processing techniques, which reduce substantially the variable unit cost of fabricating such a structure. For example, in the case of the embodiment of FIG. 2a, a plastic sheet from a first plastic roll (constituting substrate 200) is passed, in turn, through embossing rollers (which emboss grating structure 206), 40 through a vacuum deposition chamber (which metalizes
On a relative basis, the per-unit cost of an intaglio-imprinted indicating device is substantially lower than that of a transmissive-reflective color filter authenticating device, discussed above. However, on an absolute basis, the per-unit cost of an intaglio-imprinted 20 authenticating device is still somewhat too high to satisfy the fourth criterion, set forth above. Eurther-more, the intaglio-imprinted authenticating device is much less effective than is the transmissive-reflective color filter authenticating device in meeting the 25 requirements of the second criterion, discussed above.
It takes very little skill on the part of an unsophisticated layman to readily and quickly observe a change in complementary colors (each of which is observable over a relatively large but different angular orientation) 30 when a transmissive-reflective color filter authenticating device is observed at different angles or, alternatively, observed, respectively, in reflected or transmitted light. However, in the case of an intaglio-imprinted authenticating device, an image is observed by either 35 a cnange of contrast in luminance, with respect to that of the background, when the authenticating device is viewed from within a certain prescribed band of angular orientations or, in the case of Kuhl et al., by the appearance of a very thin line of contrasting color 40 when viewed within a certain e~tremelv narrow and also i3~
1 6 RCA 75,7~2 shallow band of angular orientations. In either case, it inherently takes a significant amount of time, as well as some skill, for a viewer to orient properly the intaglio-imprinted authenticating device to reveal the '1contrast" image thereon. While this significant amount of time may not be an impediment to the use of an intaylio-imprint authenticating device on such an authenticated item as a stock certificate, which can be observed relatively slowly, it is an impedim~nt to its use on a bank note or the like, which must be observed quickly by an unskilled layman (such as a cashier in a store or in a box office, by way of example).
The present invention is directed to an authenticating device which meets all of the above set forth four criteria. In the present invention an authenticating device comprises a dif~ractive phase structure embossed or cast on the surface of a substrate, which forms a special type of color filter. In principle, such a filter may be either a transmissive filter or a reflective filter. However, for reasons described in more detail below, a reflective filter is much more practical for use in an authenticating device. An authenticating device încorporating the present invention may make use of the teachings of one or more of U.S.
Patent 3,957~354, which issued to Knop on May 18, 1976;
IJ.S. Patent 3,961,836, which issued to Xnop on June 8, 1976, and U.S. Patent ~,062,628, which issued to Gale on December 13, 1977~
More specifically, an authenticating device incorporating the present invention includes a substrate bonded to the sheet material of which an authenticated item subject to counterfeiting is comprised. The substrate has a predetermined reflective diffraction grating structure formed as a relief pattern that is situated on at least one region of a viewable surface of the substrate. The reflective diffraction grating structure is filled and co~ered with a transparent 53~
1 7 RC~ 75,742 material which exhibits a given index-of-refraction.
The relief pattern forming the structure has specified grating profile, physical amplitude, and line frequency 5 parameters, such that the structure operates to separate polychromatic illuminating light inciden-t thereon into at least one pair of adjacent, separate and distinct, reflective beams of contrasting colors, in which the narrowest angular dimension of the beam-width of each 10 of the beams at a distance of thirty centimeters is at least two milliradians. The transparent material is bonded to the viewable surface of the substrate in a manner sufficiently secure to prevent the transparent material from being removed from the structure without 15 effectively destroying the structure. As used herein, the expression "adjacent, separate and distinct, reflective beams of contrasting colors" is meant to exclude the case of adjacent and contiguous color portions of the continuous spectrum of visible polychromatic (e.g., so-called "white") light, since such adjacent portions are neither "separate and distinct" from each other nor do they have colors which are 'Icontrasting''.
In the drawings:
FIG. l is a schematic diagram of a first 25 embodiment of an authenticated item having an authenticating device, comprised of single integrated structure, bonded thereto;
FIG. la is a schematic diagram of a second embodiment of an authenticated item having an 30 authenticating device, comprised of a plurality oE spaced integra-ted structures, bonded thereto.
FIGS. 2a and 2b schematically illustrate first and second embodiments of an integrated structure of the type employed by the authenticating devices of 35 FIGS. l and la;
FIGS. 3 and 3a schematically illustrate one species of an authenticating device integrated structure, in which an integrated structure is comprised of a single region diffraction grating structure, and FIGS. 4, 4a, and 4b schematically illustrate 31 ~L8~3~7~
-8- RCA 75,742 other species of an authen-ticating device integra-ted structure in which an integrated structure is comprised of a plurality of contiguous differen-t diffraction grating regions.
Referring to FIG. 1, there is shown authenticated item 100 comprised of a shee-t material, such as plas-tic or paper. In describing the presen-t invention, for illustrative purposes, i-t often will be assumed tha-t au-thenticated i-tem 100 is a bank note.
However, it should be understood that authentica-ted item 100 may take other forms, such as other types of valuable documents, having intrinsic value: cr*dit cards, passports, security passes, or phonograph records or covers therefor, by way of examples. In any case, authenticated item 100 has bonded thereto authenticatin~
device 102. Au-thenticating device 102 consists of a single integrated structure of the type shown in either FIGS. 2a or 2b. In FIG. la, authenticating device 102a consists of two (or more~ spaced integrated structures, each of the type shown in either FIGS. 2a or 2b.
As indicated in FIGS. 2a and 2b, integra-ted structure 201a or 201b, comprising authen-ticating device 102 or 102a, includes substrate 200 having a bottom surface 202 that is bonded to authenticated item 100 and a top surface 204 having a predetermined reflective dif~raction grating structure 206 formed thereon.
Transparent material 208 fills and covers reflec-tive diffraction grating structure 206. Further, -transparent material 20~ exhibits a given index-of-refraction larger than unity. Transparen-t ma-terial 208 is preferably a plastic material, such as polyvinylchloride ~PVC) or polycarbonate polyester, by way of example. (The index-of refraction of such materials is nominally about 1.5).
While substrate 200 may be comprised of metal, it is preferably also comprised of a plastic or an adhesive material.
In the case of in-tegra-ted-structure embodiment 201a, shown in FIG. 2a substrate 200 may be formed from a thermoplas-tic shee-t having diffractive structure 206 53~t 1 9 RCA 75,742 embossed or cast on surface 204 thereof. Structure 206 may be made reflective by vacuum (e.g., evaporation or sputterin~) deposition of a thin metal (e.g., aluminum) film. Transparent material 208 may then be added by laminating a plastic layer to surface 204 or, alternatively, by applying a coating of a plastic monomer or plastic solution which is thereafter cured into a solid layer.
In this case, transparent material 208 and substrate 200 10 may be made of either the same or different plas~ics.
In the case of integrated-structure embodiment 201b, shown in FIG. 2b, transparent material 208 comprises the original plastic sheet in which the diffraction grating structure 206 is embossed or cast, and substrate 200 may comprise a laminated plastic layer or either a plastic monomer or plastic solution that is later cured into a thin plastic layer. Alternatively, substrate 200 r in the case of integrated-structure 201b, may be comprised of the adhesive material that bonds its bottom surface to authenticated item 100. In other respects, the embodiments of FIGS. 2a and 2b are substantially similar.
In both the embodiments of FIGS. 2a and 2b, the combined thickness of substrate 200 and transparent 25 material 208 is t. As indicated by the arrow, the viewable surface of the reflective diffraction grating structure 206 is illuminated from above, through transparent material 208, by polychromatic light illumination 210. The grating structure 206 reflects the polychromatic illuminating light incident thereon, in manner determined by its physical amplitude A, its linesfrequency d and the spatial waveform or shape of its periodic grating profile. In accordance with the principles of the present invention, structure 206 35 has specified grating profile, physical amplitude A
and line frequency d parameters, such that structure 206 is operative to separate polychromatic illuminating light 210 incident thereon into at least one pair of adjacent, separate and distinct, reflected beam of contrasting colors, wherein the size of the narrowest 3'7~
1 10 RCA 75,742 angular dimension of the beam width of each of the beams at a distance of 30 cm is at least 2 milliradians.
Examples of reflective diffraction gratings structures 5 having such specified grating profile, physical amp]itude and line Erequency parameters are discussed in more detail below in connection with FIGS . 3 and 4.
It is often important that the overall thickness t of the integrated-structure forming authentica-ting 10 device 102 or 102a be quite small. For instance, in stacking bank notes in a stack of a predetermined number of bills, an angular tilt occurs which has a value dependent upon the product of the thickness t and the number of bills in the stack. In principle, the sheet 15 material could include a declivity or recess having a depth equal to t for receiving the authenticating device.
However, this adds to the cost. It is simpler and cheaper to maintain the maximum angular tilt low enough to prevent any bill from slipping off the stack, which is the case when the thickness t is maintained less than 0.0005 mils (i.e., about 12.5 ~m). However, to maintain sufficient strength to prevent tearing of an integrated structure having such a small overall thickness t, the physical amplitude A should be maintained as small as possible. Further, the speed at which a diffractive structure having a relatively small ratio of physical amplitude A to line spacing d can be embossed (by compression molding of a thermoplastic sheet) is much faster (and, therefore, provides a significant reduction in variable unit cost) than is the case when this ratio is large. This is another reason why the physical amplitude A should be made as small as possible.
A diffraction grating, whether reflective or 35 transmissive, formed by a surface relief pattern is a phase grating. The optical effect produced by a phase grating depends on the value of its optical amplitude a, measured in free space wavelengths ~, rather than directly on the value of its physical amplitude A.
40 However, the optical amplitude a is proportional to the ~53~
1 11 RCA 75,742 physical amplitude A, although the constant of proportionali~y differs significantly between transmissive and reflective gratings. Specifically, for a transmissive grating, the constant of proportionality is l/(nl - n), where n is the index-of-refraction of transparen-t material 20g and nl is the index-of-refraction of a transparent substrate corresponding to substrate 200.
Dielectric materials of the type (such as plastic or adhesive) that are practical for fabricating integrated structure 201a or 201b have indices-of-refraction which do not differ much from one to another. Therefore, although the index~of-refraction of such dielectric materials is high relative to unity (e.g., in the 15 vicinity of 1.5), the difference in indices-of-refraction (nl - n) of any two of such dielectric materials is small relative to unity, resulting in a large constant of proportionality l/(nl - n) for a transmissive grating.
This renders the physical amplitude A of a transmissive 20 grating quite large relative to its optical amplitude _. On the other hand, the constant of proportionality for a reflective grating is l/2n, which is much smaller than unity, since n is larger than unity. This renders the physical amplitude A of a reflective grating quite small relative to its optical amplitude a. As discussed above, there are significant benefits to be had by maintaining pysical amplitude A relatively small. It is for this reason that reflective diffraction gratings, rather than transmissive diffraction gratings, 30 are employed in the authenticating devices of the present invention.
Further, the fabrication of the integrated structures 201a and 201b,FIGS. 2a and 2b,lend themselves to continuous-flow processing techniques, which reduce substantially the variable unit cost of fabricating such a structure. For example, in the case of the embodiment of FIG. 2a, a plastic sheet from a first plastic roll (constituting substrate 200) is passed, in turn, through embossing rollers (which emboss grating structure 206), 40 through a vacuum deposition chamber (which metalizes
7~
1 12 RCA 75,742 surface of substrate 200 with a reflective coa-ting), then through lamination rollers which simultaneously also receive a laminating plastic having a laminating coating thereon from a second plastic roll (which constitutes transparent material 208). The laminate emerging from the lamination rollers passes through an adhesive application chamber, where the adhesive for bonding to the authenticating item is applied. In the 10 case of the embodiment shown in FIG. 2b, the entire lamination step may be omitted, since the bonding adhesive itself may constitute substrate 200, while the embossed plastic from the first mentioned plastic roll constitutes transparent material 208.
Reference is made to FIGS. 3 and 3a, which schematically illustrate a firs' species of a diffraction grating structure having specified grating profile, physical amplitude and line frequency parameters, such that the structure is operative to separate polychromatic 20 illuminating light incident thereon into at least one pair of adjacent, separate and distinct, reflected beams of contrasting colors, wherein the size of the narrowest angular dimension of the beam-width of each of the beams at a distance of 30 cm is at least 2 milliradians.
25 ~lore particularly, diffraction grating structure 300 comprises a single region having a narrowest dimension W.
As shown in FIG. 3a, diffraction grating structure 300 has a rectangular grating profile, a physical amplitude A and a line spacing d (i.e., a line frequency d 1).
30 Further, as indicated in FIG. 3a, grating structure 300 has a duty cycle of b/d. Only the top and bottom surfaces of structure 300 are covered by metalized reflective elements 302 and 304, which metalized reflective elements are applied by vacuum deposition.
35 Such vacuum deposition leaves the substantially vertical sides 306 of the rectangular profile of diffraction grating structure 300 substantially free of metal.
It is assumed that diffraction grating structure 300 is embossed in a plastic substrate 200 (as shown in 40 FIG. 2a) and transparent material 208 is also made o~
1 13 RCA 75,742 plastic (preferably the same plastic as substrate 200~, then transparent material 20~ can be bonded to the unmetalized portion of viewable surface 204 of substrate 200 in a manner sufficiently seeure to prevent removal -thereof from diffraction grating structure 300 without effectively destroying struc-ture 300. The same results hold in the case where diffraction grating structure 300 is embossed in a plastic transparent material 208 (as shown in FIG. 2b) and substrate 200 is in the form of either a plastic or an adhesive material.
It should be understood, however, that metalization of only the top and bottom surfaces of a rectangular grating is not the only way to prevent removal 15 of the transparent material without effectively destroying the grating structure. ~ grating structure having any type of profile may be so thinlv metalized such that there are minute voids of metal distributed over the profile.
Alternatively, a sufficiently strong metal-plastic bond ~ between transparent material and a totally metalized diffraction grating structure may be used.
Diffractive-subtractive color filters are disclosed in detail in the aforesaid U.S. Patent 3,957,354, which, inter alia, may be comprised of a reetangular 25 profile diffraction grating such as diffraction grating structure 300. ~lore particularly, diffraction grating structure 300 operates to separate polychromatic illuminating light incident thereon into a zero-order reflective beam and one or more higher diffraction order 30 refleetive beams. In aceordanee with the teachings of U.S. Patent 3,957,354, the respective eolors of the zero-diffraction order and each of the higher diffraetion orders of a reetangular profile diffraction grating depends on the wavelength spectrum eharacteristies of 3S the polyehromatic illuminating light and the optical amplitude a (which, as has been discussed above, is proportional to the physieal amplitude A) of the reetangular profile diffraetion grating. Furthermore, the resultant eolor of the sum of all the higher 40 diffraction order beams is the complement of the color 1 14 RCA 75,742 of the zero diffraction order.
As is known in the art, the angular separation between any pair of adjacent diffraction orders is a S direct function of line frequency (i.e., d 1). By making the line frequency sufficiently high, the diffrac~ion angle becomes big enough to separate each pair of adjacent diffraction orders into separate and distinct beams~
For fine-line gratings, (i.e., where the line space d 10 has a value less than twice the wavelength of the light), the diffraction angle becomes large enough that only the zero and the first diffraction orders may occur. In this case, the color of the first diffraction order is the complement of the color of the zero diffraction 15 order, so that the respective colors of the zero and firs-t diffraction orders contrast with one another to a great extent. However, even at lower line fxequencies, the physical amplitude A may be specified at such a value (in accordance with the teachings of aforesaid U.S. Patent 3,957,354) that the zero and first diffraction order have contrasting colors.
Contrast is enhanced if the respective colors of an adjacent pair of diffraction orders (e.g., the zero and first diffraction orders) are near maximum saturation. In the case of diffraction gratings having line spacing d of at least 5 micrometers (i.e., in those cases where the Huygens-Kirchoff approximation is valid), maximum saturation occurs when the duty cycle b/d is at 50 percent. IIowever, for any fine-line diffractive-subtractive color filter grating, maximum saturationoccurs at a ratio of b/d determined by the particular solution of Maxwell's equations (taking into consideration all boundary condition parameters of the grating and the polarization parameters of the incident light). In 35 general, for fine-line rectangular profile diffractive-subtractive color filters, maximum saturation occurs at a value of the ratio b/d which is other than 50 percent and which is different for reflective and trans-missive grating structures. By specifying many different sets of boundary conditions, a computer may be used to ~s~
1 15 RCA 75,7~2 solve ~'axwell's equation by numerical analysis to thereby predict the fine-line reflective rectangular profile grating parameters d, b and A at which maximum saturation 5 of desired complementary color zero and first diffraction order reflected beams will result. Alternatively, if the reflective grating parameters d and A are specified, the value of the ratio b/d that yields a degree of saturation of the color produced thereby which is close 10 to the maximum can be easily determined experimentally by a cut and try method.
In order to meet criterion 2, discussed above, the visual effect on a viewer produced by at least one pair of adjacent (e.g., zero diffraction order on the first diffrac-tion order) reflective beams from diffraction gratingstructure 300 has to be quickly and readily discernable at a normal viewing distance from authenticated item 100, under ordinary lighting conditions, wi-thout requiring any significant degree of skill on part of the viewer.
If a normal viewing distance is assumed to be 30 cm (i.e., about 1 foot), the narrowest dimension ~ of diffraction grating structure 300 should be, at the very least, sufficiently large to subtend an angle of two milliradians (at this normal viewing distance of 30 cm), ~5 in order to just meet criterion 2 (discussed above~.
In other words, disregarding any divergence of either the reflected zero order or higher order beams, the narrowest dimension of the beam-width of each of these beams is proportional to W, and at 30 cm must correspond 30 with an angular dimension, at the very least, of two milliradians. For optimum discernability, -the narrowest angular dimension of the beam-width of each of the beams, at a distance of 30 cm, should be at least an order of magnitude larger than this (i.e., 20 milliradians or 3~ more).
The expression "under ordinary lighting condition" needs some further explanation. When a diffraction grating is illuminated from a single collimated light source, it produces its most separate 40 and distinct zero and higher diffraction order output 1 16 RCA 75,742 beamsO However, when it is illuminated by substantially solely diffuse light, it produces its least separate and distinct zero and higher diffraction order output 5 beams. Ordinary lighting conditions, under which an authenticated item is normally viewed, consists of various separate, more or less collimated light sources together with a diffuse light background (with the exact relationship varying from one environment to another).
10 When the narrowest angular dimension of the beam-width of each of the pair of adjacent reflective beams of contrasting colors, at a distance of 30 cm, is at least 2 milliradians -the beams are sufficiently separate and distinct, to be discerned, under "ordinary lighting 15 conditions", i.e., an unskilled vi~wer can readily locate and discern the reflective beams by merely tilting, that is, changing the angular orientation of, an authenticated item with respect to his line of sight.
Referring to FIG. 4, there is shown a species 20 of the present invention in which an integrated structure of an authenticating device is comprised of a plurality of contiguous regions, each region consisting of a different diffraction grating structure~ More specifically, as shown in FIG. 4, region l diffraction 25 grating structure 400 is in the form of a circle of diameter W and region 2 diffraction grating structure 402 is in the form of a rectangle that surrounds region 1 structure 400 and has a narrowest dimension that is greater than W. A first sub~species of gxating structures 30 400 and 402 is shown in FIG. 4a and a second sub-species of grating structures400 and 402 is shown in FIG. 4b.
In accordance with the sub-species shown in FIG. 4a, both grating structures 400 and 402 have rectangular profiles and form difEractive-subtractive color filters 35 similar to grating structure 300. Grating structure 400 of FIG. 4a has a specified line spacing d and a speci~ied physical amplitude Al, while grating s-tructure 402 of FIG. 4a has the same specified line spacing d and a specified physical amplitude A2 different from Al. Since 40 grating structure 402 is contiguous with grating 37~
1 17 RCA 75,742 structure 400, a zero dlffraction order of both grating structures 400 and 402 may be simultaneously viewable by a viewer. Further, since the line spacing d is the same for grating structures 400 and 402, a first diffraction order of grating structures 400 and 402 in FIG. 4a also may be simultaneously viewable by a viewer.
However, the respective angular orientations of the authenticated item with respect to the light of sigh-t of the viewer are different for simultaneously viewing the respective first diffraction orders from what they are for simultaneously viewing the respective zero diffraction orders.
Referring now to the sub-species of FIG. 4 shown in FIG. 4b, both grating structure 400 of region 1 and grating structure 402 of region 2 in FIG. 4b have sinusoidal grating profiles and have the same physical amplitude A. However, the line spacing dl of grating structure 400 of FIG. 4b is different from the line spacing d2 of grating structure 402 of FIG. 4bo As is known in the art, the arcsin of the diffraction angle of a diffraction grating is equal to the ratio of wave-length to line spacing. Therefore, each of grating structures 400 and 402 of FIG. 4b, in response to being illuminated by polychromatic light, will produce higher diffraction orders in which the polychromatic light is angularly dispersed into its component spectral colors.
However, because the line spacings dl and d2 of grating structures 400 and 402 of FIG. 4b are different from one 3~ another, different selected spectral colors may be derived at the same given angle of the first diffraction order for respective regions 1 and 2 (in the sub-species of EIG. 4b) by properly choosing the respective values of line spacings dl and d2. By way of example, if line spacing dl of grating structure 400 of FIG. 4b ic selected to be only 82% of line spacing d2 of grating structure 402 of FIG. 4b, then grating structure 400 will produce a reflected beam of green (530 nm spectral wavelength) light and grating structure 402 will produce a reflected beam of complementary red (650 nm spectral 53~7g~
1 18 ~CA 75,742 wavelengths) light at the same given diffraction angle of the first diffraction order. Therefore, a viewer viewing regions 1 and 2 at this given diffraction angle 5 will see simultaneously a green region 1 and a red region 2. Furthermore, when viewing regions 1 and 2 of FIG~ 4 at slightly different angles, the respective colors of regions 1 and 2 will no longer be green and red, respectively, but still will have essentially 10 contrasting colors within the entire spatial intersection of the respective dispersion spectrums of grating structures 400 and 402 of FIGo 4b, due ~o the difference in the respective values of dl and d2 thereof.
It is desirable that the reflected beams from 15 regions 1 and 2 in the sub-species of FIG. 4b be as bright as possible. Therefore, the physical amplitude A of grating structures 400 and 402 in FIG~ 4b preferably has a value which minimizes the amount of light which remains in its respective zero dlffraction 20 order, which results in the light diffracted into the higher diffraction order reflected beams being maximized.
Furthermore, to maximize the amount o light diffracted into each first diffraction order beam, it is desirable that both grating structures 400 and 402 of FIG~ 4b be 25 fine-line diffraction gratings (discussed above), thereby suppressing the occurrence of higher diffraction order beams above the first diffraction order. In regard to maximizing the brightness of the first diffraction order of grating structures 400 and 402 of FIG. 4b, 30 reference should be made to the teachings of aforesaid U.S. Patents 3,961,836 and 4,062,628.
Returning to FIGS~ 2a and 2b, transparent material 208 may be colorless or, alternatively, may include a dye operating as an absorbent subtractive color filter that is positioned in series with the reflective beams from the diffraction grating stxucture 206. Specifically, the dye should have spectral ~3S37@1 1 l9 XCA 75,742 wavelength dependent transmission characteristics that enhance the color selectivity of the reflected beams from diffraction grating structure 206. In addition, 5 the presence of a dye within transparent material 208 enhances signal-to-noise ratio by reducing the glare produced by specular reflection from the metalized diffraction grating structure 206.
Further, transparent material 208 and/or other 10 components of the authenticating device are of a type which lend themselves to being doped with trace chemicals (e.g., magnetic, radioactive, e~c.) that permit a more sophisticated analysis by an expert.
1 12 RCA 75,742 surface of substrate 200 with a reflective coa-ting), then through lamination rollers which simultaneously also receive a laminating plastic having a laminating coating thereon from a second plastic roll (which constitutes transparent material 208). The laminate emerging from the lamination rollers passes through an adhesive application chamber, where the adhesive for bonding to the authenticating item is applied. In the 10 case of the embodiment shown in FIG. 2b, the entire lamination step may be omitted, since the bonding adhesive itself may constitute substrate 200, while the embossed plastic from the first mentioned plastic roll constitutes transparent material 208.
Reference is made to FIGS. 3 and 3a, which schematically illustrate a firs' species of a diffraction grating structure having specified grating profile, physical amplitude and line frequency parameters, such that the structure is operative to separate polychromatic 20 illuminating light incident thereon into at least one pair of adjacent, separate and distinct, reflected beams of contrasting colors, wherein the size of the narrowest angular dimension of the beam-width of each of the beams at a distance of 30 cm is at least 2 milliradians.
25 ~lore particularly, diffraction grating structure 300 comprises a single region having a narrowest dimension W.
As shown in FIG. 3a, diffraction grating structure 300 has a rectangular grating profile, a physical amplitude A and a line spacing d (i.e., a line frequency d 1).
30 Further, as indicated in FIG. 3a, grating structure 300 has a duty cycle of b/d. Only the top and bottom surfaces of structure 300 are covered by metalized reflective elements 302 and 304, which metalized reflective elements are applied by vacuum deposition.
35 Such vacuum deposition leaves the substantially vertical sides 306 of the rectangular profile of diffraction grating structure 300 substantially free of metal.
It is assumed that diffraction grating structure 300 is embossed in a plastic substrate 200 (as shown in 40 FIG. 2a) and transparent material 208 is also made o~
1 13 RCA 75,742 plastic (preferably the same plastic as substrate 200~, then transparent material 20~ can be bonded to the unmetalized portion of viewable surface 204 of substrate 200 in a manner sufficiently seeure to prevent removal -thereof from diffraction grating structure 300 without effectively destroying struc-ture 300. The same results hold in the case where diffraction grating structure 300 is embossed in a plastic transparent material 208 (as shown in FIG. 2b) and substrate 200 is in the form of either a plastic or an adhesive material.
It should be understood, however, that metalization of only the top and bottom surfaces of a rectangular grating is not the only way to prevent removal 15 of the transparent material without effectively destroying the grating structure. ~ grating structure having any type of profile may be so thinlv metalized such that there are minute voids of metal distributed over the profile.
Alternatively, a sufficiently strong metal-plastic bond ~ between transparent material and a totally metalized diffraction grating structure may be used.
Diffractive-subtractive color filters are disclosed in detail in the aforesaid U.S. Patent 3,957,354, which, inter alia, may be comprised of a reetangular 25 profile diffraction grating such as diffraction grating structure 300. ~lore particularly, diffraction grating structure 300 operates to separate polychromatic illuminating light incident thereon into a zero-order reflective beam and one or more higher diffraction order 30 refleetive beams. In aceordanee with the teachings of U.S. Patent 3,957,354, the respective eolors of the zero-diffraction order and each of the higher diffraetion orders of a reetangular profile diffraction grating depends on the wavelength spectrum eharacteristies of 3S the polyehromatic illuminating light and the optical amplitude a (which, as has been discussed above, is proportional to the physieal amplitude A) of the reetangular profile diffraetion grating. Furthermore, the resultant eolor of the sum of all the higher 40 diffraction order beams is the complement of the color 1 14 RCA 75,742 of the zero diffraction order.
As is known in the art, the angular separation between any pair of adjacent diffraction orders is a S direct function of line frequency (i.e., d 1). By making the line frequency sufficiently high, the diffrac~ion angle becomes big enough to separate each pair of adjacent diffraction orders into separate and distinct beams~
For fine-line gratings, (i.e., where the line space d 10 has a value less than twice the wavelength of the light), the diffraction angle becomes large enough that only the zero and the first diffraction orders may occur. In this case, the color of the first diffraction order is the complement of the color of the zero diffraction 15 order, so that the respective colors of the zero and firs-t diffraction orders contrast with one another to a great extent. However, even at lower line fxequencies, the physical amplitude A may be specified at such a value (in accordance with the teachings of aforesaid U.S. Patent 3,957,354) that the zero and first diffraction order have contrasting colors.
Contrast is enhanced if the respective colors of an adjacent pair of diffraction orders (e.g., the zero and first diffraction orders) are near maximum saturation. In the case of diffraction gratings having line spacing d of at least 5 micrometers (i.e., in those cases where the Huygens-Kirchoff approximation is valid), maximum saturation occurs when the duty cycle b/d is at 50 percent. IIowever, for any fine-line diffractive-subtractive color filter grating, maximum saturationoccurs at a ratio of b/d determined by the particular solution of Maxwell's equations (taking into consideration all boundary condition parameters of the grating and the polarization parameters of the incident light). In 35 general, for fine-line rectangular profile diffractive-subtractive color filters, maximum saturation occurs at a value of the ratio b/d which is other than 50 percent and which is different for reflective and trans-missive grating structures. By specifying many different sets of boundary conditions, a computer may be used to ~s~
1 15 RCA 75,7~2 solve ~'axwell's equation by numerical analysis to thereby predict the fine-line reflective rectangular profile grating parameters d, b and A at which maximum saturation 5 of desired complementary color zero and first diffraction order reflected beams will result. Alternatively, if the reflective grating parameters d and A are specified, the value of the ratio b/d that yields a degree of saturation of the color produced thereby which is close 10 to the maximum can be easily determined experimentally by a cut and try method.
In order to meet criterion 2, discussed above, the visual effect on a viewer produced by at least one pair of adjacent (e.g., zero diffraction order on the first diffrac-tion order) reflective beams from diffraction gratingstructure 300 has to be quickly and readily discernable at a normal viewing distance from authenticated item 100, under ordinary lighting conditions, wi-thout requiring any significant degree of skill on part of the viewer.
If a normal viewing distance is assumed to be 30 cm (i.e., about 1 foot), the narrowest dimension ~ of diffraction grating structure 300 should be, at the very least, sufficiently large to subtend an angle of two milliradians (at this normal viewing distance of 30 cm), ~5 in order to just meet criterion 2 (discussed above~.
In other words, disregarding any divergence of either the reflected zero order or higher order beams, the narrowest dimension of the beam-width of each of these beams is proportional to W, and at 30 cm must correspond 30 with an angular dimension, at the very least, of two milliradians. For optimum discernability, -the narrowest angular dimension of the beam-width of each of the beams, at a distance of 30 cm, should be at least an order of magnitude larger than this (i.e., 20 milliradians or 3~ more).
The expression "under ordinary lighting condition" needs some further explanation. When a diffraction grating is illuminated from a single collimated light source, it produces its most separate 40 and distinct zero and higher diffraction order output 1 16 RCA 75,742 beamsO However, when it is illuminated by substantially solely diffuse light, it produces its least separate and distinct zero and higher diffraction order output 5 beams. Ordinary lighting conditions, under which an authenticated item is normally viewed, consists of various separate, more or less collimated light sources together with a diffuse light background (with the exact relationship varying from one environment to another).
10 When the narrowest angular dimension of the beam-width of each of the pair of adjacent reflective beams of contrasting colors, at a distance of 30 cm, is at least 2 milliradians -the beams are sufficiently separate and distinct, to be discerned, under "ordinary lighting 15 conditions", i.e., an unskilled vi~wer can readily locate and discern the reflective beams by merely tilting, that is, changing the angular orientation of, an authenticated item with respect to his line of sight.
Referring to FIG. 4, there is shown a species 20 of the present invention in which an integrated structure of an authenticating device is comprised of a plurality of contiguous regions, each region consisting of a different diffraction grating structure~ More specifically, as shown in FIG. 4, region l diffraction 25 grating structure 400 is in the form of a circle of diameter W and region 2 diffraction grating structure 402 is in the form of a rectangle that surrounds region 1 structure 400 and has a narrowest dimension that is greater than W. A first sub~species of gxating structures 30 400 and 402 is shown in FIG. 4a and a second sub-species of grating structures400 and 402 is shown in FIG. 4b.
In accordance with the sub-species shown in FIG. 4a, both grating structures 400 and 402 have rectangular profiles and form difEractive-subtractive color filters 35 similar to grating structure 300. Grating structure 400 of FIG. 4a has a specified line spacing d and a speci~ied physical amplitude Al, while grating s-tructure 402 of FIG. 4a has the same specified line spacing d and a specified physical amplitude A2 different from Al. Since 40 grating structure 402 is contiguous with grating 37~
1 17 RCA 75,742 structure 400, a zero dlffraction order of both grating structures 400 and 402 may be simultaneously viewable by a viewer. Further, since the line spacing d is the same for grating structures 400 and 402, a first diffraction order of grating structures 400 and 402 in FIG. 4a also may be simultaneously viewable by a viewer.
However, the respective angular orientations of the authenticated item with respect to the light of sigh-t of the viewer are different for simultaneously viewing the respective first diffraction orders from what they are for simultaneously viewing the respective zero diffraction orders.
Referring now to the sub-species of FIG. 4 shown in FIG. 4b, both grating structure 400 of region 1 and grating structure 402 of region 2 in FIG. 4b have sinusoidal grating profiles and have the same physical amplitude A. However, the line spacing dl of grating structure 400 of FIG. 4b is different from the line spacing d2 of grating structure 402 of FIG. 4bo As is known in the art, the arcsin of the diffraction angle of a diffraction grating is equal to the ratio of wave-length to line spacing. Therefore, each of grating structures 400 and 402 of FIG. 4b, in response to being illuminated by polychromatic light, will produce higher diffraction orders in which the polychromatic light is angularly dispersed into its component spectral colors.
However, because the line spacings dl and d2 of grating structures 400 and 402 of FIG. 4b are different from one 3~ another, different selected spectral colors may be derived at the same given angle of the first diffraction order for respective regions 1 and 2 (in the sub-species of EIG. 4b) by properly choosing the respective values of line spacings dl and d2. By way of example, if line spacing dl of grating structure 400 of FIG. 4b ic selected to be only 82% of line spacing d2 of grating structure 402 of FIG. 4b, then grating structure 400 will produce a reflected beam of green (530 nm spectral wavelength) light and grating structure 402 will produce a reflected beam of complementary red (650 nm spectral 53~7g~
1 18 ~CA 75,742 wavelengths) light at the same given diffraction angle of the first diffraction order. Therefore, a viewer viewing regions 1 and 2 at this given diffraction angle 5 will see simultaneously a green region 1 and a red region 2. Furthermore, when viewing regions 1 and 2 of FIG~ 4 at slightly different angles, the respective colors of regions 1 and 2 will no longer be green and red, respectively, but still will have essentially 10 contrasting colors within the entire spatial intersection of the respective dispersion spectrums of grating structures 400 and 402 of FIGo 4b, due ~o the difference in the respective values of dl and d2 thereof.
It is desirable that the reflected beams from 15 regions 1 and 2 in the sub-species of FIG. 4b be as bright as possible. Therefore, the physical amplitude A of grating structures 400 and 402 in FIG~ 4b preferably has a value which minimizes the amount of light which remains in its respective zero dlffraction 20 order, which results in the light diffracted into the higher diffraction order reflected beams being maximized.
Furthermore, to maximize the amount o light diffracted into each first diffraction order beam, it is desirable that both grating structures 400 and 402 of FIG~ 4b be 25 fine-line diffraction gratings (discussed above), thereby suppressing the occurrence of higher diffraction order beams above the first diffraction order. In regard to maximizing the brightness of the first diffraction order of grating structures 400 and 402 of FIG. 4b, 30 reference should be made to the teachings of aforesaid U.S. Patents 3,961,836 and 4,062,628.
Returning to FIGS~ 2a and 2b, transparent material 208 may be colorless or, alternatively, may include a dye operating as an absorbent subtractive color filter that is positioned in series with the reflective beams from the diffraction grating stxucture 206. Specifically, the dye should have spectral ~3S37@1 1 l9 XCA 75,742 wavelength dependent transmission characteristics that enhance the color selectivity of the reflected beams from diffraction grating structure 206. In addition, 5 the presence of a dye within transparent material 208 enhances signal-to-noise ratio by reducing the glare produced by specular reflection from the metalized diffraction grating structure 206.
Further, transparent material 208 and/or other 10 components of the authenticating device are of a type which lend themselves to being doped with trace chemicals (e.g., magnetic, radioactive, e~c.) that permit a more sophisticated analysis by an expert.
Claims (16)
1. An article comprising an authenticated item of sheet material which is subject to counterfeiting and an authenticating device bonded to said item, wherein said device includes:
a substrate bonded to said sheet material, said substrate having a predetermined reflective diffraction grating structure formed as a relief pattern that is situated on at least one region of a viewable surface of said substrate, a transparent material filling and covering said reflective diffraction grating structure, said transparent material exhibiting a given index-of-refraction, wherein said relief pattern forming said structure has specified grating profile, physical amplitude and line frequency parameters such that said structure is operative to separate polychromatic illuminating light incident thereon into at least one pair of adjacent, separate and distinct, reflected beams of contrasting colors, wherein the size of the narrowest angular dimension of the beam-width of each of said beams at a distance of thirty centimeters is at least two milli-radians, and wherein said transparent material is bonded to said viewable surface of said substrate in a manner sufficiently secure to prevent said transparent material from being removed from said structure without effectively destroying said structure.
a substrate bonded to said sheet material, said substrate having a predetermined reflective diffraction grating structure formed as a relief pattern that is situated on at least one region of a viewable surface of said substrate, a transparent material filling and covering said reflective diffraction grating structure, said transparent material exhibiting a given index-of-refraction, wherein said relief pattern forming said structure has specified grating profile, physical amplitude and line frequency parameters such that said structure is operative to separate polychromatic illuminating light incident thereon into at least one pair of adjacent, separate and distinct, reflected beams of contrasting colors, wherein the size of the narrowest angular dimension of the beam-width of each of said beams at a distance of thirty centimeters is at least two milli-radians, and wherein said transparent material is bonded to said viewable surface of said substrate in a manner sufficiently secure to prevent said transparent material from being removed from said structure without effectively destroying said structure.
2. The article defined in Claim 1, wherein said transparent material exhibits a given index-of-refraction greater than unity, and wherein said relief pattern forming said structure has such grating profile, physical amplitude and line frequency parameters that, in cooperation with said given index-of-refraction, said structure operates as a diffractive-subtractive filter having predetermined transfer function characteristics.
3. The article defined in Claim 1, wherein said transparent material exhibits a given index-of-refraction greater than unity, and wherein said relief pattern has a rectangular profile and such physical amplitude and line frequency parameters that, in cooperation with said given index-of-refraction, said structure diffracts through at least a certain angle, determined by said line frequency, a portion of said polychromatic illuminating light to discriminatingly transfer; as a predetermined function of wavelength of the wavelength spectrum of said polychromatic light, some certain fraction of each spectral component of said polychromatic illuminating light into diffraction orders higher than the zero diffraction order and transfer substantially the entire remainder of said polychromatic illuminating light into the zero diffraction order, said certain angle being sufficient to obtain zero and higher diffraction order reflected beams that are separate and distinct from one another, whereby the color of said zero diffraction order reflected beam is the complement of the color of the aggregate of all the diffraction order beams higher than said zero diffraction order.
4. The article defined in Claim 3, wherein said diffraction grating structure is comprised of a fine-line grating which diffracts said polychromatic illuminating light through a certain angle that is large enough to limit the number of higher diffraction orders to solely said first diffraction order, whereby the color of said zero diffraction order reflected beam is the complement of the color of said first diffraction order reflected beam.
5. The article defined in Claim 1, wherein said relief pattern is comprised of at least first and second contiguous regions, said first region being comprised of a first diffraction grating having first specified grating profile, physical amplitude and line frequency parameters, said second region being comprised of a second diffraction grating having second specified grating profile, physical amplitude and line frequency parameters, at least one of said second specified parameters of said second grating being different from the corresponding one of said first specified parameters of said first grating.
6. The article defined in Claim 5, wherein said first and second grating profiles are rectangular, wherein said first and second line frequencies are substantially identical, wherein said transparent material exhibits a given index-of-refraction, wherein said first physical amplitude has a first given value such that, in cooperation with said given index-of-refraction, said first grating operates as a diffractive-subtractive filter deriving a zero diffraction order reflected beam of a first color and a first diffraction order reflected beam of a second color, and wherein said second physical amplitude has a second given value, different from said first given value, such that, in cooperation with said given index-of-refraction, said second grating operates as a diffractive-subtractive filter deriving a zero diffraction order reflected beam of a third color which contrasts with said first color and a first diffraction order reflected beam of a fourth color which contrasts with said second color.
7. The article defined in Claim 6, wherein said first and second gratings are fine-line diffraction gratings which diffract said polychromatic illuminating light through a certain angle that is large enough to limit the number of higher diffraction order reflected beams to solely said first diffraction order reflected beam, and wherein the respective first and second given values of said first and second physical amplitudes are such that said third color is the complement of said first color, whereby said fourth color is the complement of said second color.
8. The article defined in Claim 1, wherein said transparent material includes a dye which forms an absorbent subtractive filter through which both said polychromatic illuminating light and said reflected beam pass, said dye filter having predetermined wavelength-dependent transmission characteristics which cooperate with the wavelength-dependent diffractive characteristics of said structure to enhance the color selectivity of the contrasting colors of said reflected beams.
9. The article defined in Claim 1, wherein said structure has a rectangular profile in which the respective top and bottom surfaces of said rectangular profile are substantially solely reflective and the respective side surfaces of said rectangular profile are substantially solely transmissive.
10. The article defined in Claim l, wherein said authenticating device further includes, a separate other substrate spaced from said first-mentioned substrate and bonded to said sheet material, said second substrate having another predetermined reflective diffraction grating structure formed as a relief pattern that is situated on at least one region of a viewable surface of said other substrate, and another transparent material filling and covering said other reflective diffraction grating structure, said other transparent material exhibiting a given index-of-refraction, wherein said relief pattern forming said other structure has specified grating profile, physical amplitude and line frequency parameters such that said other structure is operative to separate polychromatic illuminating light incident thereon into at least one pair of adjacent, separate and distinct, reflected beams of contrasting colors, wherein the size of the narrowest angular dimension of the beam-width of each of said beams from said other structure at a distance of thirty centimeters is at least two milliradians, and wherein said other transparent material is bonded to said viewable surface of said other substrate in a manner sufficiently secure to prevent said other transparent material from being removed from said other structure without effectively destroying said other structure.
11. The article defined in Claim 10, wherein the respective sizes of the narrowest angular dimension of the beam-width of each of said beams from both said first-mentioned and said other structures at a distance of thirty centimeters is at least twenty milliradians.
12. The article defined in Claim 1, wherein the respective sizes of the narrowest angular dimension of the beam-width of each of said beams from said structure at a distance of thirty centimetners is at least twenty milliradians.
13. The article defined in Claim 1, wherein said transparent material includes trace chemicals of a type which permit sophisticated analysis of the authenticity of said authenticating device.
14. An authenticating device for use in authenticating an item of sheet material when said device is bonded to said item; said device comprising:
a substrate adapted to be bonded to said sheet material, said substrate having a predetermined reflective diffraction grating structure formed as a relief pattern that is situated on at least one region of a viewable surface of said substrate, a transparent material filling and covering said reflective diffraction grating structure, said transparent material exhibiting a given index-of-refraction, wherein said relief pattern forming said structure has specified grating profile, physical amplitude and line parameters such that said structure is operative to separate polychromatic illuminating light incident thereon into at least one pair of adjacent, separate and distinct, reflected beams of contrasting colors, wherein the size of the narrowest angular dimension of the beam-width of each of said beams at a distance of thirty centimeters is at least two milliradians, and wherein said transparent material is bonded to said viewable surface of said substrate in a manner sufficiently secure to prevent said transparent material from being removed from said structure without effectively destroying said structure.
a substrate adapted to be bonded to said sheet material, said substrate having a predetermined reflective diffraction grating structure formed as a relief pattern that is situated on at least one region of a viewable surface of said substrate, a transparent material filling and covering said reflective diffraction grating structure, said transparent material exhibiting a given index-of-refraction, wherein said relief pattern forming said structure has specified grating profile, physical amplitude and line parameters such that said structure is operative to separate polychromatic illuminating light incident thereon into at least one pair of adjacent, separate and distinct, reflected beams of contrasting colors, wherein the size of the narrowest angular dimension of the beam-width of each of said beams at a distance of thirty centimeters is at least two milliradians, and wherein said transparent material is bonded to said viewable surface of said substrate in a manner sufficiently secure to prevent said transparent material from being removed from said structure without effectively destroying said structure.
15. The authenticating device defined in claim 14, wherein said transparent material exhibits a given index-of-refraction greater than unity, and wherein said relief pattern forming said structure has such grating profile, physical amplitude and line frequency parameters that, in cooperation with said given index-of-refraction, said structure operates as a diffractive-subtractive filter having predetermined transfer function characteristics.
16. The authenticating device defined in claim 14, wherein said relief pattern is comprised of at least first and second contiguous regions, said first region being comprised of a first diffraction grating having first specified grating profile, physical amplitude and line frequency parameters, said second region being comprised of a second diffraction grating having second specified grating profile, physical amplitude and line frequency parameters, at least one of said second specified parameters of said second grating being different from the corresponding one of said first specified parameters of said first grating.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US235,970 | 1981-02-19 | ||
US06/235,970 US4892385A (en) | 1981-02-19 | 1981-02-19 | Sheet-material authenticated item with reflective-diffractive authenticating device |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA1185370A true CA1185370A (en) | 1985-04-09 |
Family
ID=22887603
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA000396399A Expired CA1185370A (en) | 1981-02-19 | 1982-02-16 | Sheet-material authenticated item with reflective- diffractive authenticating device |
Country Status (10)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US4892385A (en) |
JP (1) | JPS6023040B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA1185370A (en) |
CH (1) | CH661602A5 (en) |
DE (1) | DE3206062A1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES8303759A1 (en) |
FR (1) | FR2500020A1 (en) |
GB (1) | GB2093404B (en) |
IT (1) | IT1200367B (en) |
NL (1) | NL8200656A (en) |
Families Citing this family (89)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4484797A (en) * | 1981-07-20 | 1984-11-27 | Rca Corporation | Diffractive subtractive color filter responsive to angle of incidence of polychromatic illuminating light |
CH653161A5 (en) * | 1981-10-27 | 1985-12-13 | Landis & Gyr Ag | DOCUMENT WITH A SECURITY CHARACTERISTIC AND METHOD FOR CHECKING THE DOCUMENT FOR AUTHENTICITY. |
US4576439A (en) * | 1982-09-15 | 1986-03-18 | Rca Corporation | Reflective diffractive authenticating device |
CH659433A5 (en) * | 1982-10-04 | 1987-01-30 | Landis & Gyr Ag | DOCUMENT WITH A REFLECTIVE OPTICAL SECURITY ELEMENT. |
GB2128549B (en) * | 1982-10-13 | 1986-02-12 | Standard Telephones Cables Ltd | Debit/credit card |
JPS5988780A (en) * | 1982-11-08 | 1984-05-22 | アメリカン・バンク・ノ−ト・カムパニ− | Making of optical refraction recording body and optical refraction pattern |
JPS605557U (en) * | 1983-06-24 | 1985-01-16 | 筒中プラスチツク工業株式会社 | anti-counterfeit card |
JPS6016389U (en) * | 1983-07-14 | 1985-02-04 | 大日本印刷株式会社 | Anti-counterfeit magnetic tape |
CH661368A5 (en) * | 1984-01-03 | 1987-07-15 | Landis & Gyr Ag | Diffraction optical safety element. |
DE3422910C1 (en) * | 1984-06-20 | 1985-09-05 | Leonhard Kurz GmbH & Co, 8510 Fürth | Embossing foil, in particular hot stamping foil with a magnetic layer |
AU4922485A (en) * | 1984-11-09 | 1986-05-15 | Canadian Patents And Development Limited | Optical interference authenticating device |
KR860009325A (en) * | 1985-05-07 | 1986-12-22 | 기다지마 요시도시 | Transparent Hologram |
DE3608746A1 (en) * | 1986-03-15 | 1987-09-17 | Kolbe Druck Gmbh & Co Kg | Forgery-proof badge, official stamp, or licence or inspection plate |
US5360628A (en) * | 1986-04-30 | 1994-11-01 | Butland Trust Organization | Technique for labeling an object for its identification and/or verification |
US4832445A (en) * | 1986-05-16 | 1989-05-23 | American Bank Note Holographics, Inc. | Security diffraction devices difficult to exactly duplicate |
US5145212A (en) † | 1988-02-12 | 1992-09-08 | American Banknote Holographics, Inc. | Non-continuous holograms, methods of making them and articles incorporating them |
EP0330738B1 (en) * | 1988-03-03 | 1991-11-13 | Landis & Gyr Betriebs AG | Document |
JP2532598B2 (en) * | 1988-08-03 | 1996-09-11 | シャープ株式会社 | Method and apparatus for manufacturing optical memory device |
GB8913417D0 (en) * | 1989-06-10 | 1989-08-02 | Emi Plc Thorn | Verification device for a security system |
JPH05307633A (en) * | 1992-04-28 | 1993-11-19 | Nhk Spring Co Ltd | Identification structure for object and its identifying method |
US5142383A (en) * | 1990-01-25 | 1992-08-25 | American Banknote Holographics, Inc. | Holograms with discontinuous metallization including alpha-numeric shapes |
US5213373A (en) * | 1990-08-06 | 1993-05-25 | Severino Ramos | Mark position independent form and tallying method |
GB9025390D0 (en) * | 1990-11-22 | 1991-01-09 | De La Rue Thomas & Co Ltd | Security device |
DE59204591D1 (en) * | 1991-10-14 | 1996-01-18 | Landis & Gyr Tech Innovat | Security element. |
US5538753A (en) * | 1991-10-14 | 1996-07-23 | Landis & Gyr Betriebs Ag | Security element |
US5403040A (en) * | 1992-03-30 | 1995-04-04 | The Standard Register Company | Optically variable and machine-readable device for use on security documents |
JPH05289612A (en) * | 1992-04-06 | 1993-11-05 | Nhk Spring Co Ltd | Information recording system and information communication system |
US5296949A (en) * | 1992-04-23 | 1994-03-22 | Flexcon Company Inc. | Optical authentication device |
AT403967B (en) * | 1992-11-18 | 1998-07-27 | Oesterr Nationalbank | DOCUMENT AND FILM STRUCTURE FOR PRODUCING A DOCUMENT |
BE1006699A5 (en) * | 1992-12-08 | 1994-11-22 | Belgique Banque Nat | Protects against copyright document and method for obtaining such a document. |
DE4404128A1 (en) | 1993-02-19 | 1994-08-25 | Gao Ges Automation Org | Security document and method for its manufacture |
US5464690A (en) * | 1994-04-04 | 1995-11-07 | Novavision, Inc. | Holographic document and method for forming |
GB9406794D0 (en) * | 1994-04-06 | 1994-05-25 | Applied Holographics | Protected relief patterns |
DE4421407C1 (en) * | 1994-06-18 | 1995-06-01 | Kurz Leonhard Fa | Area element with a three-dimensional regionally coated microstructure |
DE4432062C1 (en) * | 1994-09-09 | 1995-11-30 | Kurz Leonhard Fa | Visually identifiable optical security element for credit cards etc. |
EP0712012A1 (en) * | 1994-11-09 | 1996-05-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Authentication label and authenticating pattern incorporating diffracting structure and method of fabricating them |
US5591527A (en) * | 1994-11-02 | 1997-01-07 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Optical security articles and methods for making same |
DE19516741C2 (en) * | 1995-05-06 | 1997-05-07 | Kurz Leonhard Fa | Diffractive-optical structure arrangement |
US5704651A (en) * | 1995-05-25 | 1998-01-06 | Verify First Technologies, Inc. | Counterfeit resistant documents and methods |
US5772248A (en) * | 1995-12-07 | 1998-06-30 | Verify First Technologies, Inc. | Document with tamper and counterfeit resistant relief markings |
US5873604A (en) * | 1995-05-25 | 1999-02-23 | Verify First Technologies, Inc. | Document security system having thermo-activated pantograph and validation mark |
US5886798A (en) * | 1995-08-21 | 1999-03-23 | Landis & Gyr Technology Innovation Ag | Information carriers with diffraction structures |
AU6355996A (en) * | 1996-01-26 | 1997-08-20 | Landis & Gyr Technology Innovation Ag | Surface pattern |
US5762378A (en) * | 1996-02-16 | 1998-06-09 | Verify First Technologies, Inc. | Tamper resistant validation marks |
WO1998010324A1 (en) * | 1996-09-04 | 1998-03-12 | Electrowatt Technology Innovation Ag | Surface pattern with at least two different light-diffracting relief structures for optical security elements |
DE29700998U1 (en) * | 1997-01-10 | 1997-03-13 | Bundesdruckerei Gmbh | Disk |
CH693517A5 (en) * | 1997-06-06 | 2003-09-15 | Ovd Kinegram Ag | Surface pattern. |
EP1019876A1 (en) | 1997-09-30 | 2000-07-19 | Durand Limited | Anti-counterfeiting and diffusive screens |
EP0999525B1 (en) * | 1998-11-06 | 2006-04-05 | Kyodo Printing Co., Ltd. | Forgery resisting security document |
FR2801246B1 (en) * | 1999-11-19 | 2002-01-25 | Hologram Ind | SECURING DOCUMENTS OR PRODUCTS BY APPOSITION OF AN OPTICALLY ACTIVE COMPONENT FOR AUTHENTICITY VERIFICATION |
DE10054503B4 (en) * | 2000-11-03 | 2005-02-03 | Ovd Kinegram Ag | Light diffractive binary lattice structure and security element with such a lattice structure |
ATE396059T1 (en) * | 2002-01-18 | 2008-06-15 | Ovd Kinegram Ag | DIFFRACTIVE SAFETY ELEMENT WITH INTEGRATED OPTICAL WAVEGUIDE |
JP2004109417A (en) * | 2002-09-18 | 2004-04-08 | Dainippon Printing Co Ltd | Method for manufacturing optical diffraction structure, replication forming plate and medium |
US20040099740A1 (en) * | 2002-11-25 | 2004-05-27 | Chresand Thomas J. | Merchandising components for authenticating products, and combinations and methods utilizing the same |
FR2849708B1 (en) * | 2003-01-03 | 2005-03-11 | Banque De France | WAVEGUIDE SECURITY DEVICE |
US6980654B2 (en) * | 2003-09-05 | 2005-12-27 | Graphic Security Systems Corporation | System and method for authenticating an article |
US7029525B1 (en) | 2003-10-21 | 2006-04-18 | The Standard Register Company | Optically variable water-based inks |
US7738175B2 (en) * | 2003-11-21 | 2010-06-15 | Visual Physics, Llc | Micro-optic security and image presentation system providing modulated appearance of an in-plane image |
US8867134B2 (en) * | 2003-11-21 | 2014-10-21 | Visual Physics, Llc | Optical system demonstrating improved resistance to optically degrading external effects |
EP1695121B1 (en) | 2003-11-21 | 2014-06-04 | Visual Physics, LLC | Micro-optic security and image presentation system |
DE102004017093B4 (en) | 2004-04-07 | 2007-09-20 | Leonhard Kurz Gmbh & Co. Kg | Embossing foil for the production of counterfeit-proof motor vehicle number plates and counterfeit-proof motor vehicle license plate with such embossing foil and use |
WO2006001012A2 (en) * | 2004-06-25 | 2006-01-05 | Technion Research And Development Foundation Ltd. | Geometrical phase data encryption and decryption |
GB0417422D0 (en) | 2004-08-05 | 2004-09-08 | Suisse Electronique Microtech | Security device |
CN101379423B (en) * | 2005-05-18 | 2016-04-06 | 光学物理有限责任公司 | Image represents and micro-optic security system |
CA2651986C (en) * | 2006-05-12 | 2011-09-13 | Crane & Co., Inc. | A micro-optic film structure that alone or together with a security document or label projects images spatially coordinated with static images and/or other projected images |
JP4876853B2 (en) * | 2006-10-24 | 2012-02-15 | 凸版印刷株式会社 | OVD medium and printed information including OVD medium |
WO2009066970A1 (en) * | 2007-11-19 | 2009-05-28 | Sergiu Vasiliev | Method for verifying the authencity of document |
DE102007061979A1 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2009-06-25 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | security element |
EP2109014A1 (en) * | 2008-04-08 | 2009-10-14 | JDS Uniphase Corporation | Improved OVD containing device |
DE102008036670B3 (en) * | 2008-08-06 | 2009-11-26 | Leonhard Kurz Stiftung & Co. Kg | Film, process for its preparation, and use |
RU2567138C2 (en) | 2009-03-30 | 2015-11-10 | Боэгли-Гравюр С.А. | Method and apparatus for structuring solid body surface coated with solid material using laser |
CA2757146C (en) * | 2009-03-30 | 2017-09-12 | Boegli-Gravures S.A. | Method and device for structuring the surface of a hard material coated solid body by means of a laser |
EP3626474A1 (en) * | 2009-08-12 | 2020-03-25 | Visual Physics, LLC | A tamper indicating optical security device |
DE102009056934A1 (en) | 2009-12-04 | 2011-06-09 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Security element, value document with such a security element and manufacturing method of a security element |
DE102010047250A1 (en) | 2009-12-04 | 2011-06-09 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Security element, value document with such a security element and manufacturing method of a security element |
WO2012103441A1 (en) | 2011-01-28 | 2012-08-02 | Crane & Co., Inc | A laser marked device |
DE102011108242A1 (en) | 2011-07-21 | 2013-01-24 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Optically variable element, in particular security element |
MX2014001926A (en) | 2011-08-19 | 2014-08-21 | Visual Physics Llc | Optionally transferable optical system with a reduced thickness. |
WO2014028031A1 (en) | 2012-08-17 | 2014-02-20 | Visual Physics, Llc | A process for transferring microstructures to a final substrate |
DE102012108169A1 (en) | 2012-09-03 | 2014-05-28 | Ovd Kinegram Ag | Security element as well as security document |
JP6091883B2 (en) * | 2012-12-19 | 2017-03-08 | 株式会社東芝 | Concentrator and solar cell |
KR102191322B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2020-12-16 | 비쥬얼 피직스 엘엘씨 | Optical security device |
US9873281B2 (en) | 2013-06-13 | 2018-01-23 | Visual Physics, Llc | Single layer image projection film |
CA2943987A1 (en) | 2014-03-27 | 2015-10-01 | Visual Physics, Llc | An optical device that produces flicker-like optical effects |
US10766292B2 (en) | 2014-03-27 | 2020-09-08 | Crane & Co., Inc. | Optical device that provides flicker-like optical effects |
US10800203B2 (en) | 2014-07-17 | 2020-10-13 | Visual Physics, Llc | Polymeric sheet material for use in making polymeric security documents such as banknotes |
AU2015317844B2 (en) | 2014-09-16 | 2019-07-18 | Crane Security Technologies, Inc. | Secure lens layer |
KR20170110699A (en) | 2015-02-11 | 2017-10-11 | 크레인 앤 코, 인크 | Method for surface application of a security device to a substrate |
CA3051841A1 (en) | 2017-02-10 | 2018-08-16 | Crane & Co., Inc. | Machine-readable optical security device |
Family Cites Families (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3643216A (en) * | 1968-08-06 | 1972-02-15 | Rca Corp | Holographic identification system |
CA944987A (en) * | 1972-01-18 | 1974-04-09 | National Research Council Of Canada | Optical interference authenticating means |
US3858977A (en) * | 1972-01-18 | 1975-01-07 | Canadian Patents Dev | Optical interference authenticating means |
US3814904A (en) * | 1972-10-20 | 1974-06-04 | Rca Corp | Cryptographically coded cards employing synthetic light modifying portion |
US3961836A (en) * | 1974-09-20 | 1976-06-08 | Rca Corporation | Focused-image hologram system providing increased optical readout efficiency |
US3957354A (en) * | 1975-02-03 | 1976-05-18 | Rca Corporation | Diffractive subtractive color filtering technique |
US4034211A (en) * | 1975-06-20 | 1977-07-05 | Ncr Corporation | System and method for providing a security check on a credit card |
CH588358A5 (en) * | 1975-08-14 | 1977-05-31 | Landis & Gyr Ag | |
US4184700A (en) * | 1975-11-17 | 1980-01-22 | Lgz Landis & Gyr Zug Ag | Documents embossed with optical markings representing genuineness information |
CH594936A5 (en) * | 1975-11-17 | 1978-01-31 | Landis & Gyr Ag | |
GB1538342A (en) * | 1976-01-19 | 1979-01-17 | Rca Corp | Structure and recording for diffractive relief images for zero-order read-out in black-and-white |
DE2613034A1 (en) * | 1976-03-26 | 1977-09-29 | Siemens Ag | FALSE-PROOF IDENTITY CARD WITH LIPPMANN-BRAGG HOLOGRAM |
GB1552853A (en) * | 1976-09-24 | 1979-09-19 | Bank Of England | Authentication devices |
FR2418955A1 (en) * | 1978-03-02 | 1979-09-28 | Instruments Sa | ACCESS CARD CODING AND RECOGNITION PROCESS |
DE2853953A1 (en) * | 1978-12-14 | 1980-07-03 | Hoechst Ag | IDENTIFICATION CARD |
CH640649A5 (en) * | 1979-01-31 | 1984-01-13 | Landis & Gyr Ag | Device for cash payment lots of goods or services. |
-
1981
- 1981-02-19 US US06/235,970 patent/US4892385A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1982
- 1982-02-12 ES ES509556A patent/ES8303759A1/en not_active Expired
- 1982-02-15 GB GB8204338A patent/GB2093404B/en not_active Expired
- 1982-02-16 CA CA000396399A patent/CA1185370A/en not_active Expired
- 1982-02-17 CH CH993/82A patent/CH661602A5/en unknown
- 1982-02-18 IT IT19720/82A patent/IT1200367B/en active
- 1982-02-18 NL NL8200656A patent/NL8200656A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1982-02-19 FR FR8202812A patent/FR2500020A1/en active Granted
- 1982-02-19 DE DE19823206062 patent/DE3206062A1/en active Granted
- 1982-02-19 JP JP57026731A patent/JPS6023040B2/en not_active Expired
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
FR2500020B1 (en) | 1985-01-04 |
IT1200367B (en) | 1989-01-18 |
DE3206062A1 (en) | 1982-08-19 |
DE3206062C2 (en) | 1987-06-11 |
JPS57159696A (en) | 1982-10-01 |
GB2093404B (en) | 1985-02-27 |
GB2093404A (en) | 1982-09-02 |
NL8200656A (en) | 1982-09-16 |
US4892385A (en) | 1990-01-09 |
IT8219720A0 (en) | 1982-02-18 |
ES8303759A1 (en) | 1983-04-01 |
JPS6023040B2 (en) | 1985-06-05 |
CH661602A5 (en) | 1987-07-31 |
ES509556A0 (en) | 1983-02-01 |
FR2500020A1 (en) | 1982-08-20 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA1185370A (en) | Sheet-material authenticated item with reflective- diffractive authenticating device | |
US7102823B2 (en) | Diffractive security element having an integrated optical waveguide | |
US4484797A (en) | Diffractive subtractive color filter responsive to angle of incidence of polychromatic illuminating light | |
KR100905833B1 (en) | Security Element With Diffraction Structures | |
EP0911758B1 (en) | Optical identification system using cholesteric liquid crystals | |
US4417784A (en) | Multiple image encoding using surface relief structures as authenticating device for sheet-material authenticated item | |
CA1232068A (en) | Form depicting, optical interference authenticating device | |
EP2739483B1 (en) | Improvements in security devices | |
RU2443004C2 (en) | Optical security marking component, method of manufacturing such a component, system comprising such a component, and reader for checking such a component | |
US9297941B2 (en) | Optically variable element, in particular security element | |
US7680274B2 (en) | Security element comprising micro- and macrostructures | |
US6271967B1 (en) | Optically diffractive structure | |
JP2012123102A (en) | Display body and labeled article | |
US5296949A (en) | Optical authentication device | |
JP5082378B2 (en) | Display and printed matter | |
JP3689237B2 (en) | Object identification structure | |
JP6379547B2 (en) | Image display body and information medium | |
AU2020273504B2 (en) | Optical security component having a plasmonic effect, manufacture of such a component, and secure object provided with such a component | |
AU2021218474A1 (en) | An optical effect device | |
NZ200303A (en) | Bank note authentication by diffraction grating structure bonded to note | |
JP5994899B2 (en) | Display and labeled goods | |
LIGHT | Waite tates |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
MKEX | Expiry |