The Future of Just War: New Critical EssaysCaron E. Gentry, Amy E. Eckert Just War scholarship has adapted to contemporary crises and situations. But its adaptation has spurned debate and conversation—a method and means of pushing its thinking forward. Now the Just War tradition risks becoming marginalized. This concern may seem out of place as Just War literature is proliferating, yet this literature remains welded to traditional conceptualizations of Just War. Caron E. Gentry and Amy E. Eckert argue that the tradition needs to be updated to deal with substate actors within the realm of legitimate authority, private military companies, and the questionable moral difference between the use of conventional and nuclear weapons. Additionally, as recent policy makers and scholars have tried to make the Just War criteria legalistic, they have weakened the tradition's ability to draw from and adjust to its contemporaneous setting. The essays in The Future of Just War seek to reorient the tradition around its core concerns of preventing the unjust use of force by states and limiting the harm inflicted on vulnerable populations such as civilian noncombatants. The pursuit of these challenges involves both a reclaiming of traditional Just War principles from those who would push it toward greater permissiveness with respect to war, as well as the application of Just War principles to emerging issues, such as the growing use of robotics in war or the privatization of force. These essays share a commitment to the idea that the tradition is more about a rigorous application of Just War principles than the satisfaction of a checklist of criteria to be met before waging “just” war in the service of national interest. |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action agent American argue attack autonomous weapons beautiful soul Cambridge capabilities casualties challenge chance of success chapter civilian combatants concept conflict conventional weapons cpgs criteria decision defend Doctrine Double Effect duty emergence enemy epistemic Ethics Feminist fighting foreseen G. E. M. Anscombe Gender global harm Heinze human rights human security Humanitarian Intervention Ibid intention International Relations International Studies Iraq jus ad bellum jus in bello jus post bellum Justice killing Laura Sjoberg legitimacy legitimate authority Michael Walzer missile moral agency noncombatant immunity principle norms nuclear weapons obligation ofInternational one’s Oxford peace permissible pmcs political potential private force private military Private Military Companies problem proportionality protect reasonable chance reciprocity responsibility risk roles and missions security sector Sierra Leone society soldiers sovereignty state’s strategic target Terrorism theory threat tion tradition U.S. military U.S. warfare uavs University Press Unjust Wars Vietnam violence wage warrior women