Does War Belong in Museums?: The Representation of Violence in ExhibitionsWolfgang Muchitsch Presentations of war and violence in museums generally oscillate between the fascination of terror and its instruments and the didactic urge to explain violence and, by analysing it, make it easier to handle and prevent. The museums concerned also have to face up to these basic issues about the social and institutional handling of war and violence. Does war really belong in museums? And if it does, what objectives and means are involved? Can museums avoid trivializing and aestheticising war, transforming violence, injury, death and trauma into tourist sights? What images of shock or identification does one generate - and what images would be desirable? |
Contents
9 | |
13 | |
DOES WAR BELONG IN MUSEUMS? | 19 |
HOW? | 39 |
DISPLAYING WAR | 61 |
THE BEAUTY OF WAR AND THE ATTRACTIVITY OF VIOLENCE | 105 |
THE TRAUMA OF WAR AND THE LIMITS OF MEDIA | 143 |
MILITARY HISTORY WAR MUSEUMS AND NATIONAL IDENTITY | 183 |
Contributors | 219 |
Other editions - View all
Does War Belong in Museums?: The Representation of Violence in Exhibitions Wolfgang Muchitsch No preview available - 2013 |
Common terms and phrases
activities American approach armed army artistic battle become bomb building century collection concept considered context create critical cultural Cypriot Cyprus direct display Europe example exhibition experience fact Figure floor focus forced German groups hand Holocaust housed human images Imperial important individual Institution interesting Jochen Gerz kind lives London March material means memory Military History military museums narrative objects offer Office opened original past peace period Photo photographs planned political possible present question reflect remain represent representations Second World served social society soldiers space specific story Struggle Tank Tank Museum technical tion topic tour traditional Turkish uniforms United University victims violence visitors War Museum wars weapons Weißrussland