Language Dispersal Beyond Farming

Front Cover
Martine Robbeets, Alexander Savelyev
John Benjamins Publishing Company, Dec 21, 2017 - Language Arts & Disciplines - 324 pages
Why do some languages wither and die, while others prosper and spread? Around the turn of the millennium a number of archaeologists such as Colin Renfrew and Peter Bellwood made the controversial claim that many of the world’s major language families owe their dispersal to the adoption of agriculture by their early speakers. In this volume, their proposal is reassessed by linguists, investigating to what extent the economic dependence on plant cultivation really impacted language spread in various parts of the world. Special attention is paid to "tricky" language families such as Eskimo-Aleut, Quechua, Aymara, Bantu, Indo-European, Transeurasian, Turkic, Japano-Koreanic, Hmong-Mien and Trans-New Guinea, that cannot unequivocally be regarded as instances of Farming/Language Dispersal, even if subsistence played a role in their expansion.
 

Contents

Food for thought
1
Reconstruction and contact patterns
25
Chapter 3 Subsistence terms in Unangam Tunuu Aleut
47
Chapter 4 Lexical recycling as a lens onto shared JapanoKoreanic agriculture
75
Chapter 5 The language of the Transeurasian farmers
93
Farmingrelated terms in ProtoTurkic and ProtoAltaic
123
A consideration
155
The domestications and the domesticators of Asian rice
183
Problems and perspectives
215
Were the first Bantu speakers south of the rainforest farmers? A first assessment of the linguistic evidence
235
Expanding the methodology of lexical examination in the investigation of the intersection of early agricultu
259
Chapter 12 Agricultural terms in IndoIranian
275
Chapter 13 Milk and the IndoEuropeans
291
Language index
313
Subject index
321
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Bibliographic information