Sexual States: Governance and the Struggle over the Antisodomy Law in IndiaIn Sexual States Jyoti Puri tracks the efforts to decriminalize homosexuality in India to show how the regulation of sexuality is fundamentally tied to the creation and enduring existence of the state. Since 2001 activists have attempted to rewrite Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, which in addition to outlawing homosexual behavior is often used to prosecute a range of activities and groups that are considered perverse. Having interviewed activists and NGO workers throughout five metropolitan centers, investigated crime statistics and case law, visited various state institutions, and met with the police, Puri found that Section 377 is but one element of how homosexuality is regulated in India. This statute works alongside the large and complex system of laws, practices, policies, and discourses intended to mitigate sexuality's threat to the social order while upholding the state as inevitable, legitimate, and indispensable. By highlighting the various means through which the regulation of sexuality constitutes India's heterogeneous and fragmented "sexual state," Puri provides a conceptual framework to understand the links between sexuality and the state more broadly. |
Contents
Engendering Social Problems Exposing Sexualitys Effects | |
Antisodomy Law and the Annals of Law and | |
Racializations Habitual Criminals and the Police | |
Decriminalizing and Recriminalizing | |
Afterlives | |
Notes | |
Bibliography | |
Other editions - View all
Sexual States: Governance and the Struggle over the Antisodomy Law in India Jyoti Puri No preview available - 2016 |
Sexual States: Governance and the Struggle over the Antisodomy Law in India Jyoti Puri No preview available - 2016 |
Common terms and phrases
ABVA accessed activists adult antisodomy law archive argues Arvind Narrain bar dancers biopolitical challenge chapter Colonial India communities constables crime against women Crime Records criminal critical critique cultural dance bars decriminalize homosexuality Delhi High Court Delhi Police differences discourses discussion Duke University Duke University Press edited enforcement especially feminist fieldwork filed FIRs gender minorities governance government’s reply groups Gupta heteronormativity hijras Hindu HIV/AIDS Homosexuality in India Human Rights impact Indian context Indian Penal Code institutions intervention issue justices Koushal law’s lesbian Maharashtra Mumbai Muslims Naz Foundation writ Naz Foundation’s NCRB neoliberal numbers persons police stations postcolonial protect Queer race racialized rape regulation religiouscultural reports ruling samesex sexual activity samesex sexualities Section 377 sexual and gender sexual assault sexual minorities sexual practices sexual violence sexuality rights sexuality’s Sikhs social problems sodomy state’s statistics struggle Supreme Court underscored unnatural sex Writ Petition